It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: smurfy
originally posted by: Krakatoa
a reply to: smurfy
Existing immigration law. That is the law that the DACA Executive Order bypassed by providing a temporary stay of immigration enforcement for qualified illegal immigrants.
That federal law.
It's a discretionary arrangement, (you know, a bit like those Nazis that were allowed in) and It wasn't legally challenged, while the expansion of it was though..there is a standing injunction on that part.
Just moments after Attorney General Jeff Sessions announced that President Donald Trump is rescinding the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, nine illegal immigrants and three US citizens were arrested near Trump Tower in NYC for sitting in the road and blocking traffic.
originally posted by: xuenchen
well well
Nine Illegal Immigrants Arrested at Trump Tower Protest in NYC
Just moments after Attorney General Jeff Sessions announced that President Donald Trump is rescinding the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, nine illegal immigrants and three US citizens were arrested near Trump Tower in NYC for sitting in the road and blocking traffic.
A planned stunt to sway people via the MSM. They become martyrs "for the cause". The MSM will completely ignore the fact that these people were here against the federal immigration law of the United States and play up the fact that these poor suffering people now will be deported t a country they don't know or understand the language.
Where were they for the past X years when they had the change to become legal citizens?
What law? the protest is against something that is yet to happen.
originally posted by: Krakatoa
originally posted by: smurfy
originally posted by: Krakatoa
a reply to: smurfy
Existing immigration law. That is the law that the DACA Executive Order bypassed by providing a temporary stay of immigration enforcement for qualified illegal immigrants.
That federal law.
It's a discretionary arrangement, (you know, a bit like those Nazis that were allowed in) and It wasn't legally challenged, while the expansion of it was though..there is a standing injunction on that part.
What's with the Nazi fixation??
Crimeny...we are not talking about that 70 year old situation, now are we? Can you stick to the topic at hand please.
originally posted by: smurfy
originally posted by: Krakatoa
originally posted by: smurfy
originally posted by: Krakatoa
a reply to: smurfy
Existing immigration law. That is the law that the DACA Executive Order bypassed by providing a temporary stay of immigration enforcement for qualified illegal immigrants.
That federal law.
It's a discretionary arrangement, (you know, a bit like those Nazis that were allowed in) and It wasn't legally challenged, while the expansion of it was though..there is a standing injunction on that part.
What's with the Nazi fixation??
Crimeny...we are not talking about that 70 year old situation, now are we? Can you stick to the topic at hand please.
I'm the one who is on topic, you are the one that is off, since you didn't reply to my statement in good order, just rattle on about fixations.
I do find it odd though..since you mention the Nazis back to me ...those that are war criminals that is, and are still living...those Nazis who may have left America in fairly recent times, still get their social security paid to them by the US. I just wonder if those quite young people that Trump wants to kick out, will still get their social security paid as well?
originally posted by: 3daysgone
a reply to: smurfy
What law? the protest is against something that is yet to happen.
Good point. But helping illegal immigrants evade ICE is working counter what the federal government wants to do. Hence Federal funding. There is also no law that stops federal funding.
originally posted by: Krakatoa
originally posted by: smurfy
originally posted by: Krakatoa
originally posted by: smurfy
originally posted by: Krakatoa
a reply to: smurfy
Existing immigration law. That is the law that the DACA Executive Order bypassed by providing a temporary stay of immigration enforcement for qualified illegal immigrants.
That federal law.
It's a discretionary arrangement, (you know, a bit like those Nazis that were allowed in) and It wasn't legally challenged, while the expansion of it was though..there is a standing injunction on that part.
What's with the Nazi fixation??
Crimeny...we are not talking about that 70 year old situation, now are we? Can you stick to the topic at hand please.
I'm the one who is on topic, you are the one that is off, since you didn't reply to my statement in good order, just rattle on about fixations.
I do find it odd though..since you mention the Nazis back to me ...those that are war criminals that is, and are still living...those Nazis who may have left America in fairly recent times, still get their social security paid to them by the US. I just wonder if those quite young people that Trump wants to kick out, will still get their social security paid as well?
Let's see. How many of these quoted 800,000 illegals have key national security skills in advanced rocketry, nuclear physics, etc.. that might be able to assist the MIC to defeat ISIS in our wars or advance our energy technology? If any do, then I would be willing to entertain the idea of a presidential pardon for those particular individuals and provide a path to citizenship. That could be part of that comprehensive immigration reform that congress is now charged with getting done.
How many of the 800,000 do you think qualify as the former Project Paperclip Nazi scientists did (a fact you brought into this conversation by the way)?
originally posted by: smurfy
originally posted by: Krakatoa
originally posted by: smurfy
originally posted by: Krakatoa
originally posted by: smurfy
originally posted by: Krakatoa
a reply to: smurfy
Existing immigration law. That is the law that the DACA Executive Order bypassed by providing a temporary stay of immigration enforcement for qualified illegal immigrants.
That federal law.
It's a discretionary arrangement, (you know, a bit like those Nazis that were allowed in) and It wasn't legally challenged, while the expansion of it was though..there is a standing injunction on that part.
What's with the Nazi fixation??
Crimeny...we are not talking about that 70 year old situation, now are we? Can you stick to the topic at hand please.
I'm the one who is on topic, you are the one that is off, since you didn't reply to my statement in good order, just rattle on about fixations.
I do find it odd though..since you mention the Nazis back to me ...those that are war criminals that is, and are still living...those Nazis who may have left America in fairly recent times, still get their social security paid to them by the US. I just wonder if those quite young people that Trump wants to kick out, will still get their social security paid as well?
Let's see. How many of these quoted 800,000 illegals have key national security skills in advanced rocketry, nuclear physics, etc.. that might be able to assist the MIC to defeat ISIS in our wars or advance our energy technology? If any do, then I would be willing to entertain the idea of a presidential pardon for those particular individuals and provide a path to citizenship. That could be part of that comprehensive immigration reform that congress is now charged with getting done.
How many of the 800,000 do you think qualify as the former Project Paperclip Nazi scientists did (a fact you brought into this conversation by the way)?
Or better yet NY rejects federal aid.
But yea Trump kicks it where this thing belongs, to congress, but the constitutional move is not respected.
Thanks for a proper reply, but as far as I know nearly all DACA funding is paid for by the applicant.
REPUBLICANS TELL DEMOCRATS: 'WE'LL GIVE YOU DACA IF YOU FUND TRUMP'S BORDER WALL'
www.newsweek.com...
originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: smurfy
They aren't eligible for SS benefits.
originally posted by: Krakatoa
originally posted by: xuenchen
well well
Nine Illegal Immigrants Arrested at Trump Tower Protest in NYC
Just moments after Attorney General Jeff Sessions announced that President Donald Trump is rescinding the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, nine illegal immigrants and three US citizens were arrested near Trump Tower in NYC for sitting in the road and blocking traffic.
A planned stunt to sway people via the MSM. They become martyrs "for the cause". The MSM will completely ignore the fact that these people were here against the federal immigration law of the United States and play up the fact that these poor suffering people now will be deported t a country they don't know or understand the language.
Where were they for the past X years when they had the change to become legal citizens?
originally posted by: carewemust
originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: smurfy
They aren't eligible for SS benefits.
They probably will retire very well off.. like a lot of the immigrants from India are doing. No need for Social Security.
People born in this country whine about everything that doesn't even affect them, for decades, and end up retiring flat broke.
Thousands of protesters took to the streets of Chicago Tuesday to protest President Donald Trump’s decision to end the Consideration of Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals.
The demonstrators gathered at Federal Plaza downtown about 5:30 p.m. were planning to march toward Trump Tower, according to a group’s Facebook post claiming to have organized the event.