«...he is flesh: his days shall be 120 years»

There is an odd connection with the first few chapters of Genesis and certain numbers of intrinsic nature, in my mind suggesting a divine origin of our Solar System.

Then the LORD said, “My Spirit shall not abide in man forever, for he is flesh: his days shall be 120 years.” [ESV] Genesis 6:3

When Adam was 130 years he fathered Seth, and Seth was 105 when he fathered Enosh and so on until Noah's generation where he was 500 and fathered Shem, Ham and Japheth, and thereby the Feudal system. If you add up all these years, we learn that the Flood happened 1556 years after year 1, meaning the Flood happened in the year 1557 after Adam.

Now 1557 is just three years short of 1560 which is exactly 120 x 13, a complete Venus morning star cyclus which is slightly shorter than 120 years. However, while the round figures make it easier to count with and remember, they are not entirely precise in the very long run. There is another thing with 1560 which relates to Venus, for there are the eight years between the two Venus transits that happen with a period of 8 years apart. 1560 : 104 = 15. There are 15 cycles of 104 and 13 cycles of 120 years in 1560 years. If we do the same operation with 1557 : 13 we get a number that is actually closer to the real world cyclus of Venus, leaving room for the year the Deluge supposedly lasted.

There is more. There is a thing called the precession of the equinoxes. Every year at sunrise, the Sun appears to rise slightly earlier for each time, almost unnoticeable in a generation. The round measures here are -1° every 72nd year meaning that it will take the Sun roughly 25 920 years to make a full cycle through 12 astrological ages. Thus 25 920 : 120 = 216, which in turn is 3 x 72.

Now, over a period of 8 years, Venus draws a near perfect, but ever preceding pentagram across the Solar system, this is called the Morningstar Cycle. Since Venus is one of the planets between Earth and Sol, you can see the exact same pattern in Geocentric as well as Heliocentric charts. Also, bear in mind that these are rounded figures again. The real calculations take much more care for details, for it's often never exactly as they say in the books. The five points of the pentagram are 72° apart, passing every other point at an angle of 120°, and the points end up with a star with five 36° spikes.

Now are all these things coincidental? No, I'd say. Nothing is coincidental with this Solar System of ours. For more oddities surrounding our Solar System, check out another one of my threads about how the orbits of the planets seem to hint at something more than coincidence. You can find that thread here: www.abovetopsecret.com...

It' all coincidence. For every number and calculation that fits the fantasy, there are others that miss. Sorry, but not running with this theory.

a reply to: paraphi

Well, it's not so much a theory as an observation, but fair enough, the idea that modern humans walked this planet for nearly 300 000 years without noticing Venus or all the other oddities involved with Earth, its year, cycles and its calendar, as well as its neighbours in space-- seems to be the dominating view.

originally posted by: Utnapisjtim
Well, it's not so much a theory as an observation, but fair enough, the idea that modern humans walked this planet for nearly 300 000 years without noticing Venus or all the other oddities involved with Earth, its year, cycles and its calendar, as well as its neighbours in space-- seems to be the dominating view.

While mainstream science puts modern (anatomical) humans at around 200,000 years walking the planet, we cannot know what they thought. We do know that the night sky would have looked very different from today.

However, I will not knock you for your observation, nor the play with maths that does get the mind thinking...

a reply to: paraphi

Although Wikipedia will tell you modern humans are about 200 000 years old, the fossil record and finds in Morocco place the dawn of modern humans to 100 000 years earlier, or around 300 000 years ago. And what do you know, they even had bigger craniums.

Sources:
==> www.nature.com...
==> www.nature.com...
==> www.ft.com...
==> news.nationalgeographic.com...

It is what it is. Funny how the Lunar year (approx 354.375 days) gives us the number by which we can easily square a circle...
Divide the circumference of any circle by 3.54375 and the answer will be the length of one side of a square of equal area - close enough that if you were drawing it on A4 paper with a biro, the true answer would be contained within the thickness of the pen line.
There are lots of clues in space and time pointing us back toward who we really are.
Coincidence is just the safe word of the ego.

originally posted by: 1656hrs
It is what it is. Funny how the Lunar year (approx 354.375 days) gives us the number by which we can easily square a circle...
Divide the circumference of any circle by 3.54375 and the answer will be the length of one side of a square of equal area - close enough that if you were drawing it on A4 paper with a biro, the true answer would be contained within the thickness of the pen line.
There are lots of clues in space and time pointing us back toward who we really are.
Coincidence is just the safe word of the ego.

Welcome to the boards and thanks for a refreshing reply, thanks for squaring the circle here, mate. Literally.

There, your first star

The numbers, given the circle has a diametre of 1:

π : 3.54375 = 0.8865164455 (side of the square)
0.8865164455 x 4 = 3.546065782

3.546065782 : 3.54375 = 1.000653483 which is about as close to 1 as you can get using a pen.

3.54375 vs. 3.546065782 is pretty frogging close! If the diametre of the circle is 1 metre, this square is precise within a margin less than 0.65 mm. Like usr: 1656hrs says, less than a common pen's width. Thanks for the heads-up

a reply to: Utnapisjtim

Imagine how wonderful it must've been without calculators! Without the Devil that is the detail casting those few digits of doubt...
Giving that the numbers we're working with are either inherently variable, or fixed and 'infinite' - it makes one wonder whether or not the solar system itself is just one huge calculator trying to remove some kind of doubt.

a reply to: Utnapisjtim

Talking of cranium sizes, I think you'll like this:

My head measurement is precisely 24 inches. Which is 60.96cm. Taking the string and winding it round the tip of my ring finger 14 times is an exact fit. If I unwind 4 loops nearest/on my cuticle (cut[cir]cle) then that length is the length of one side of a square with an equal area to the inferred circular area given by a head circumference measurement of 24 inches. It may not be exact - but when drawn with an ordinary biro on a piece of A4 paper, the correct answer lies again within the thickness of the pen line/string used. The rest requires a little faith.
If the string wound round something exactly 7 times, I'd be removing 2 loops. 21:6, 28:8 and so on...

And talking of coincidence... 16.56 on the 24hr clock is how many seconds through the day?
And which other minute encodes 666 so well - where two sixes are already present and the third is generated by adding the other two digits?

a reply to: 1656hrs

Solar system spitting out the first few primes. Stellar calculator makes sense. Earth is obviously a place in the sky where bloody everything makes sense. Beats me and my intellect anyhow. Looking at it makes me feel very smal and infinite at the same time. God has his riddles all lined up for us. Is Earth an intelligence turbo?

a reply to: 1656hrs

It is my opinion that we are served measures by the divine. Using my own personal human measures, I end up with back pains since the base-10 system is so bloody precise (or erroneous, given your way of rationalising). Base 12 and 60 and rounding figures-- is all king when counting like the genius of the ages. We have been put here for a reason. This world is for educating gods and oddballs, and for punishing their proud and ignorant.

ETA: Love the word biro. I call them a straightedge, pens and a pair of compasses

originally posted by: Utnapisjtim
a reply to: 1656hrs
We have been put here for a reason. This world is for educating gods and oddballs, and for punishing their proud and ignorant.

Stars aren't enough.

originally posted by: 1656hrs

originally posted by: Utnapisjtim
a reply to: 1656hrs
We have been put here for a reason. This world is for educating gods and oddballs, and for punishing their proud and ignorant.

Stars aren't enough.

They do make us all wiggle our tails in joy and naive and humble love, though. That is always a good sign. The dude in the sky is more than a king, He is the king of all kings. Our given Godhead

I just happen to see it all. And it is perfect and complete. The good lord is one of us, his judgements are precise. Hope we don't lose any!

originally posted by: Utnapisjtim
a reply to: 1656hrs

Solar system spitting out the first few primes.

Talking of primes - that's one of the hidden things '1656hrs' alludes to, when converted to seconds and proportionally reduced along with the remainder of the day.

originally posted by: 1656hrs

originally posted by: Utnapisjtim
a reply to: 1656hrs

Solar system spitting out the first few primes.

Talking of primes - that's one of the hidden things '1656hrs' alludes to, when converted to seconds and proportionally reduced along with the remainder of the day.

primes.utm.edu...

....and If I may--

www.abovetopsecret.com...

More doom porn,it's funny how things are always added to the bible or story's,making it sound like a fairy tale,because the truth always spoils a good story

a reply to: Oldtimer2

Hehe, doom porn? What has this all got to do with doom? It's about the morningstar cycle and the antediluvian generations listed in Genesis. The Venus transits of 120 years apart just happened btw. In 2004 and 2012. Last time it happened before that was 120 years before 2012, in 1882. The ancient Hebrews must have known this.

1560 : 104 = 120 : 8 = 15
1560 :120 = 104 : 8 = 13

That looks like doom to you?

originally posted by: Utnapisjtim
...it will take the Sun roughly 25 920 years to make a full cycle through 12 astrological ages. Thus 25 920 : 120 = 216, which in turn is 3 x 72.

Whoa. Hang on.

How can you possibly use this system to analyse anything when you say the sun "roughly" takes 25,920 years to make a full circle. What if it takes 25,990? Then your calculations break.

This stuff only seems like it has a pattern because you MAKE it fit the pattern you want.

a reply to: Utnapisjtim

When Adam was 130 years he fathered Seth, and Seth was 105 when he fathered Enosh and so on until Noah's generation where he was 500 and fathered Shem, Ham and Japheth, and thereby the Feudal system.

a suggestion they had sex at that age...grosses me out

a reply to: Utnapisjtim

he was 500 and fathered Shem, Ham and Japheth

damn...I'm picturing it now.

500 year old ball sack...drooping down...swinging. Flesh against stale flesh.

brutal.