It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Xcathdra
originally posted by: Wolfenz
originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: Wolfenz
Its NOT Hospital law but POLICY.
Policy is subordinate to state and federal law.
As for the rest its why I said I want more info to place everything into proper context.
well that what i ment policy thanks
Not trying to be a dick but their is a major difference between a law and a policy.
originally posted by: NightSkyeB4Dawn
a reply to: Guiltyguitarist
Even if the doctor was in the hospital, the nurse would still be in charge. Doctors write orders for their patients, and not all patients have the same doctor. Some doctors don't have hospital privileges so a hospitalist or another doctor that has privileges may cover for the doctor.
Doctors know very little about hospital policies, rules and regulations. They depend on the nurse to keep them out of trouble.
They have their hands full thy don't want anything to do with anything like this.
Also, all hospital administrators are not doctors, some have absolutely no medical background at all.
originally posted by: WeRpeons
a reply to: dreamingawake
The nurse was just following orders from her supervisor. She explained to the police officer why she couldn't allow him to draw blood. This doofus police officer thinks just because he has a badge he can arrest someone for protecting a patients rights and doing their job?
The smart thing he should have done was to call his supervisor and explained the hospital's patient's protection procedure. Instead he decided to handle this innocent nurse like she was a criminal. This cop should be fired for his actions.
originally posted by: LadyGreenEyes
and thanks from the department of the off-duty cop she was protecting (the patient)
originally posted by: alphabetaone
originally posted by: LadyGreenEyes
and thanks from the department of the off-duty cop she was protecting (the patient)
How certain are you about this part? I haven't read yet anything about the patient she was protecting other than he was driving a truck and with a CDL at that. Is what you've said here verified?
Truly curious....
originally posted by: vonclod
a reply to: LadyGreenEyes
Why, would be to deflect some amount of culpability to the innocent driver..this whole deal was the result of a police chase gone bad..it's going to cost them dearly and they want someone else to share the blame..it ain't gonna happen.
originally posted by: Bone75
originally posted by: alphabetaone
originally posted by: LadyGreenEyes
and thanks from the department of the off-duty cop she was protecting (the patient)
How certain are you about this part? I haven't read yet anything about the patient she was protecting other than he was driving a truck and with a CDL at that. Is what you've said here verified?
Truly curious....
East Idaho News
originally posted by: infolurker
originally posted by: vonclod
a reply to: LadyGreenEyes
Why, would be to deflect some amount of culpability to the innocent driver..this whole deal was the result of a police chase gone bad..it's going to cost them dearly and they want someone else to share the blame..it ain't gonna happen.
Yes,
They have to try to blame the victim as they have a problem with the fact that the accident was caused by the police chase in some way.
originally posted by: vonclod
seems weird the suspect would suicide himself into a semi if the chase was just initiated..would it really change thing's that much?..I suppose it could.
originally posted by: paraphi
American police need better training. This is a good example on how not to do things. Are the American police out to make people disrespect them?