FBI says lack of public interest in Hillary emails justifies withholding documents

Hillary Clinton’s case isn’t interesting enough to the public to justify releasing the FBI’s files on her, the bureau said this week in rejecting an open-records request by a lawyer seeking to have the former secretary of state punished for perjury.

“You have not sufficiently demonstrated that the public’s interest in disclosure outweighs personal privacy interests of the subject,” FBI records management section chief David M. Hardy told Mr. Clevenger in a letter Monday.

Link

Well I'm the public and I'm interested... are you ATS?

Discuss...

originally posted by: GuidedKill

Hillary Clinton’s case isn’t interesting enough to the public to justify releasing the FBI’s files on her, the bureau said this week in rejecting an open-records request by a lawyer seeking to have the former secretary of state punished for perjury.

“You have not sufficiently demonstrated that the public’s interest in disclosure outweighs personal privacy interests of the subject,” FBI records management section chief David M. Hardy told Mr. Clevenger in a letter Monday.

Link

Well I'm the public and I'm interested... are you ATS?

Discuss...

Everyone should be interested.
I believe the stuff contained would affect the entire world
Or exonerate Hillary
Why not disclose ?

a reply to: GuidedKill

I'm interested, and I'm not even American.

a reply to: Gothmog

They won't disclose because they know they don't have to. We can't do a damn thing about it, and TPTB know it all to well.

originally posted by: Gothmog

originally posted by: GuidedKill

Hillary Clinton’s case isn’t interesting enough to the public to justify releasing the FBI’s files on her, the bureau said this week in rejecting an open-records request by a lawyer seeking to have the former secretary of state punished for perjury.

“You have not sufficiently demonstrated that the public’s interest in disclosure outweighs personal privacy interests of the subject,” FBI records management section chief David M. Hardy told Mr. Clevenger in a letter Monday.

Link

Well I'm the public and I'm interested... are you ATS?

Discuss...

Everyone should be interested.
I believe the stuff contained would affect the entire world
Or exonerate Hillary
Why not disclose ?

I'm with ya!! If she is in fact innocent of any crimes why not let them investigate? Or in this particular case it's just a FOIA request. For no wrong doing and a person not even under criminal investigation they sure are tight lipped about it...

a reply to: GuidedKill

The FBI also didn't think the public deserved to know trump was being investigated for colluding with the Russian government .. exactly what he was pretending the media was lying about screaming "fake news..".


It's not weird the the FBI doesn't release info.. it's weird when they do.. that's the unique circumstance..

What a silly excuse! I am certainly interested. If they are no longer looking to investigate her in this matter and their is no criminal intent determined...why hold on to it? Release it.

Edit add: I seem to recall that they determined that her emails mostly entailed 'personal family' info that had no bearing on America. Certainly, looking forward to having a chance to see her in a more humanistic caring being.

a reply to: GuidedKill

What has Imran Awan said?

How's his family?

a reply to: GuidedKill

When you are the FBI and you work for and answer to the previous administration, your credibility is kind of shot to begin with, so making ignorant statements like this is normal.

I suppose they didn't intend to be stupid, but it was just something that happened. Remember, intent is key here.

Hillary pretty much lost the election due to her e-mail situation. But yeah, I'm sure there is no public interest in it. It's nothing more than corruption. The IC doesn't serve The People of the USA, it serves the Globalist interest.

Who exactly is this David M. Hardy that made this decision, and is Christopher Wray aware of this decision. Is Jeff Sessions? Maybe we need to all contact them and let them know that, "Yes, we are interested"!!

a reply to: GuidedKill

The article is missing relevant facts. Namely, what was Clevenger requesting? How are those documents related to her handling of emails?

Without that information, it's really hard to say anything meaningful about this.

originally posted by: queenofswords
Who exactly is this David M. Hardy that made this decision, and is Christopher Wray aware of this decision. Is Jeff Sessions? Maybe we need to all contact them and let them know that, "Yes, we are interested"!!

What are you interested in?

a reply to: theantediluvian

What do you think?

originally posted by: iWontGiveUP
a reply to: GuidedKill

What has Imran Awan said?

How's his family?

No comment.... from the grave.

originally posted by: queenofswords
a reply to: theantediluvian

What do you think?

Her yoga schedule?

a reply to: GuidedKill

utterly and completely incorrigible.

originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: GuidedKill

When you are the FBI and you work for and answer to the previous administration, your credibility is kind of shot to begin with, so making ignorant statements like this is normal.

I suppose they didn't intend to be stupid, but it was just something that happened. Remember, intent is key here.

Darn that intent!! I didn't intend to gain 10 lbs from eating Mc Donald's all week but here we are......

originally posted by: queenofswords
Who exactly is this David M. Hardy that made this decision, and is Christopher Wray aware of this decision. Is Jeff Sessions? Maybe we need to all contact them and let them know that, "Yes, we are interested"!!

That's a great idea!! Wonder how we can express our interest to the FBI as the very "public " they speak of?!?

(Raises hand) 🤚 I'm interested!!

originally posted by: TruMcCarthy

originally posted by: queenofswords
a reply to: theantediluvian

What do you think?

Her yoga schedule?

You owe me a steak!! I just vomited thinking of that woman in yoga pants bending and stretching....