If your a time traveler

i time travel space to watch the cool old cartoons.

a reply to: openyourmind1262

Why don't you just exhale and then stop.

and stop what?

Seriously, are you having trouble finishing sentences?

Do you feel dizzy?

Your reply proves my point......

So asking if you had received a head injury is somehow proving you only 10% of your brain?

So I am to assume you did and that is the cause of you saying you only use 10% of your brain?

No human is using more than 10 % of their brain.....It's a real thing...Google it.

I and most humans I come into contact with and interact with use more than 10% of their brains.

Yes, there are examples of people that might use less, hint hint

But I suppose YOU are not like the other 99.99% of us. Your special.

No, actually the opposite.

Its special or a minority of people who are almost brain dead.

Your reply proves my point.....

again its the opposite, your own reply proves that some do use only 10% of their brain when they conclude with they have say with such a sick remark.

originally posted by: openyourmind1262
a reply to: enlightenedservant

The Koran is more convoluted than the Christian Bible....One might as well read The Book of Mormon.

seriously?


so someone tries to educated you and help you use more than 10% and you do well to prove that some really do only 10%

I guess, a well done is in order

a reply to: enlightenedservant

I've have read the Koran, that's why I said what I did about it. It's convoluted and makes zero sense. The book of Mormon is at least a good page turner, which also makes zero sense. But I suppose you and your super brain knows best. So with that I will leave you to Islam on out and spread the word with that superior than most brain you have.

I joke just for you this morning....A Cowboy & American Indian & A Muslim were all having a chat. The Indian say's " Once we were many, now were are few". The Muslim say's" once we were few now we are many". The Cowboy say's, "It's obvious we have never played " Cowboys & Muslim's . So you understand, I detest all religions, especially the one you prescribe too.

originally posted by: openyourmind1262
a reply to: enlightenedservant

I've have read the Koran, that's why I said what I did about it. It's convoluted and makes zero sense. The book of Mormon is at least a good page turner, which also makes zero sense. But I suppose you and your super brain knows best. So with that I will leave you to Islam on out and spread the word with that superior than most brain you have.

I joke just for you this morning....A Cowboy & American Indian & A Muslim were all having a chat. The Indian say's " Once we were many, now were are few". The Muslim say's" once we were few now we are many". The Cowboy say's, "It's obvious we have never played " Cowboys & Muslim's . So you understand, I detest all religions, especially the one you prescribe too.

I now doubt you even use 10%.

Thank you for telling us that you detest religion and that you use 10% or as indicated less of your brain.

Sorry to ask as it may really strain your brain,

How is any of this related to this thread about a message to time travelers?

Hello all!

I see a couple of you have your handbags out and are fighting a duel!

I'd love to be the kind of time traveller that could go back in time, however I'm stuck travelling slowly in one direction like the rest of humanity.

I don't post/visit very often nowadays and it's mostly because of people making ridiculous claims more and more often here on our beloved boards, like claiming to be time travellers when they clearly aren't. It's great to have a bit of a laugh and a joke, but some of the posters on this thread and ones like it are delusional and we shouldn't be encouraging such things...both to maintain the quality of our posts and to protect those poor delusional souls from themselves.

Just MHO.

Rev

The future ain't what it used to be.

a reply to: abe froman

I saw this video: Nobody was on the ship, only the crew. 10-15 members escaped on a rope at the back of the ship onto a smaller ship . They were well dressed. There was no electricity or any sign of lighting, there were no lifeboats at all, and no nearby ships or boats. The "Titanic" sign couldn't be seen at the back or the side. The ship looked the same, and was not sinking at the time of the video. There was no iceberg (right side) and no trace of ice particles on the ship. The footage was black and white with no sound.

I wonder how many atheist and zealous followers would go back in time to save Jesus? Better yet how many will try to go back and kill Jesus themselves!?

All I know is if try to kill him myself too... Bah haha

I can do time jumps.

Unfortunately, I can only jump forward in time.

When I do a time jump, I have to go to the internet, to catch up on what I missed, because my memory then has "a time gap" equal to the time displacement period I jumped over.

So, it's as if I just forgot everything my short term memory collected over the past few days or weeks etc...

I think most older people experience this, but the medical profession mislabels this as "short term memory loss", not acknowledging our supernormal powers to jump through time.

So, people who have supernormal powers are often unaware of their powers because there's always some other "label" invented to name the symptoms, leading to an obfuscation of what is really going on.

We time jump more and more frequently as we approach old age, as "death" is the ultimate "time jump", when we leap into a new body somewhere in the spacetime continuum.

a reply to: Specimen

Why? What did he ever do that's wrong? I thought that some of the biggest criticisms of Christianity were that many modern Christians don't follow his teachings. Many scholars and atheists don't even think there's a shred of proof that the man existed. So how would going back in time to kill him actually make things better?

People do bad stuff in the name of others all the time. I even saw a Pentagon official say that Dr Martin Luther King Jr would've supported the war in Iraq (HERE), even though MLK had a major speech against the Vietnam war which got him ostracized.

So should people in the future go back in time to kill MLK just because someone who never met him said he'd support their war? After all, both the Prophet Jesus and Dr MLK were already killed before reaching the age of 40, so it's not like they lived long enough to see out their goals anyway.

originally posted by: enlightenedservant
I thought that some of the biggest criticisms of Christianity were that many modern Christians don't follow his teachings. Many scholars and atheists don't even think there's a shred of proof that the man existed. So how would going back in time to kill him actually make things better?

It's a misconception about Christianity that people have.

You don't have to follow Jesus' teachings.

Jesus himself said, those that follow him are saved, those that do not are not saved.

Jesus never called his followers "Christians".

Christians are just the people who "spread the word of Christ."

Jesus said of these types of people,

For he that is not against us is on our part. -- KJV, Mark 9:40

So, Christians are just people who are "not against" Jesus, so they help to spread the word to those that are or will be saved.

They are like messengers, bringing the news, that those with ears to hear need to hear.

Of course, those that are saved, "recognize the message" and automatically follow the words of the Lord. While, the messengers deliver the message, but don't necessarily follow anything in it.

So, what is called "Christians" today, is a mix of people who are saved, will be saved, and various "messengers" of the word.

a reply to: enlightenedservant

Why not? Everyone else supposedly bathes in his blood, Hell, Rapha does it a million times a day from what I know.

Not to mention the fact that God itself would probably wipe out an armada of Angela if they got order of the universe wrong.

a reply to: AMPTAH

Is the word Christian supposed to mean Cosmic one, and derives from the Greek language?

a reply to: AMPTAH

It's a misconception about Christianity that people have. You don't have to follow Jesus' teachings.

According to which denomination? Don't pretend that that's a universal belief in Christianity.

So, Christians are just people who are "not against" Jesus, so they help to spread the word to those that are or will be saved.

If you really think Christians are really just people who are not against the Prophet Jesus, then that means that you think all Muslims are "Christians" too. He's literally one of the 4 most revered Prophets in Islam. One of the 114 Surahs in the Qur'an is even named after Mother Mary/Mariam. The Qur'an even calls him the Messiah & says the following (Surah 3, Ayat 45-48, Pickthall translation):

45. (And remember) when the angels said: O Mary! Lo! Allah giveth thee glad tidings of a word from him, whose name is the Messiah, Jesus, son of Mary, illustrious in the world and the Hereafter, and one of those brought near (unto Allah).

46. He will speak unto mankind in his cradle and in his manhood, and he is of the righteous.

47. She said: My Lord! How can I have a child when no mortal hath touched me ? He said: So (it will be). Allah createth what He will. If He decreeth a thing, He saith unto it only: Be! and it is.

48. And He will teach him the Scripture and wisdom, and the Torah and the Gospel,

a reply to: Specimen

In other words, you can't or won't give a serious answer? Then I guess I'm wasting my time.

originally posted by: abe froman
a reply to: intrptr

As you well know, The International Time Travel Operator Regulations (or TITOR) prevents that.

Thats right!, you would fork a new universe and only that version will have what you want.

Double post

a reply to: enlightenedservant

Yes, and the timeline between Jesus and MLK is 2 thousand years old, so MLK has little signitcance if Jesus were struck first wouldn't it?

Then again if I went after MLK, I'd have a large black mass after me wouldn't I?

a reply to: Specimen

Yes, and the timeline between Jesus and MLK is 2 thousand years old, so MLK has little signitcance if Jesus were struck first wouldn't it?

Seeing as Dr MLK was an active Reverend and the head of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, I'm thinking there would indeed be some significance to it. lol

Then again if I went after MLK, I'd have a large black mass after me wouldn't I?

But if you went after the Prophet Jesus, you'd still have a "large black mass" after you. You know, since most African Americans are Christians, most Afro-Latinos/Latinas are Christians, and Christianity is one of the 2 largest religions on the African continent. And since virtually everything in both the Old and New Testament happened in Africa and Western Asia, it's safe to say the followers from his time in Northern Africa and Western Asia were brown skinned too. Arabs didn't take over North Africa until 600-ish years later after the Prophet Muhammad died.

Also, you seem to have completely missed the point. My point is that people constantly do bad stuff in the names of others. That doesn't mean the person they mentioned is the reason for their crimes, depravity, or atrocities, it just means they're the scapegoat, pretext, or excuse.

Here's another perspective: The Prophet Jesus was already believed to have been killed at a relatively young age by people who feared and/or hated his message. But his untimely murder only jumpstarted his movement. So even if you thought his followers and proclaimed followers were a problem throughout history, killing him clearly wouldn't prevent their rise to power & prominence.

If anything, I suspect that keeping him alive would've drastically changed history because Saul/Paul never would've gotten the chance to shape the message afterwards. The only time Saul supposedly met the Prophet Jesus was long after he'd died. Saul was a prosecutor of his actual followers, but then Saul supposedly received a vision from the long dead prophet. This vision supposedly changed Saul's life, he changed his name to Paul, and then began proselytizing. Pauline Christianity is by far the largest branch of Christianity now & I doubt this would be the case if the Prophet would've lived a long life (because there would be no need for Paul's explanations and interpretations).