Movement for Black Lives Ideology Is Nazism, But For Black People

a reply to: testingtesting

LOL so the second option it is. Maybe you should take a look in the mirror and determine who you are instead of trying to determine who others are through a few posts.

a reply to: Xcalibur254

No, but that chant is based on a lie. Also a single chant doesn't change much of what is said at BLM rallies.

a reply to: Dfairlite

I know I will never stick up for nazis nor make excuses for nazi twits running crowds down.

a reply to: SlapMonkey

Of course it has. Notice the answer when I point out that I'm comparing the similarities of something I'm supposedly an apologist for to something I obviously dislike.

They've got nothing but labels. No arguments.

a reply to: testingtesting

Nor will I.

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Butterfinger

And who is most concerned with the horrors of immigration?

Apparently Obama, according to La Raza who called him Deporter in Chief, and he still holds the record for most deportations.
www.newsweek.com...

Also, would you mind including these countries as well in your moral declarations?

humanevents.com...

Italy
Australia
China
Russia
Iran
Mexico

Should I dig up more nations that are tough on illegals?

Suddenly we are surrounded by Nazis, who knew? Besides you I mean.

originally posted by: Sublimecraft

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Sublimecraft
You on the other hand are now on record supporting the blatant lies in the OP.

god you're predictable, how did I know your retort would be so......pathetic?

Easy, your moral compass is skewed towards extreme hate.

Brace yourself brother, I have a feeling you are about to be indirectly called a NAZI, or a NAZI sympathizer. It's on the third page of the playbook I believe. Just offering a heads up.

a reply to: SlapMonkey


Is there a such thing as a "decent" Nazi?

originally posted by: Gryphon66
You left out that the American Nazi Party's apparent greatest concern is the "dangers" of illegal immigration;

I wonder what political group also has that primary concern, eh?

You also dramatically paraphrased everything said on either site to force this absurd comparison. Why don't you try QUOTING from your source material if you're interested in intellectual integrity at all?

But, hey, it looks like you're more interested Stars and Bars, er, I mean Flags, right? I'm sure the faithful will supply that for you.

I can say what groups it's not a concern for.

Can you?

a reply to: windword

A dead one maybe.

a reply to: Gryphon66

You left out that the American Nazi Party's apparent greatest concern is the "dangers" of illegal immigration; I wonder what political group also has that primary concern, eh?

Do you mean which party actively campaigns fighting the foundation of this country of which everything is built upon ?

If immigration law doesn't matter.

The Afforable Care Act doesn't matter.

Gun control laws don't matter.

It's called up holding the rule of law.

Because if we don't uphold it.

There is absolutely no effing need for congress.

originally posted by: neo96

There is absolutely no effing need for congress.

The Constitution disagrees with your assessment.

a reply to: Gryphon66

No it doesn't,

Congress was given the power to create bills signed in to law by the Potus.

People/politicians have no rights to ignore them for benefit of their political parties.

a reply to: Butterfinger

Is Obama the topic here? Is La Raza?

I mean, it's a fraudulent thread, with a hoaxed title, dishonest links, etc.

Does the stated policy of the American Nazi Party match the Trump Doctrine or not?

That's my comment. The rest is your issue.

As Wheeler Walker Jr. Says, "Today's country music is just rap for people who are afraid of black people."

Seems applicable.

a reply to: windword

This is an imbecilic question, because you're trying to create a trap--nowhere did I say that those who are neo-nazis in the UtR groups are decent people.

But to answer a stupid question with a stupid answer, I'm sure that Hitler thought that there were many decent Nazis in his ranks...objectively speaking, perception matters in such debates about morality. People think that the god who destroyed cities and tempted people Abraham to kill his son (but then yelled, "Just kidding!") is a decent being...there's no accounting for taste, I suppose, as the people of Soddom and Gammorah would probably think otherwise.*

But I'm not Hitler, nor am I the morality enforcer of the world. I only now what I know for myself, and anyone espousing racial-supremacy views and ideologies are ignorant jackasses who lack many, if not all, forms of human decency.



* No, I did not just equate the Jewish/Christian god to Hitler, I was just using that as a way to point out perspective. Hopefully prefacing the answer with, "But to answer a stupid question with a stupid answer...," will help people understand that.

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: Gryphon66

No it doesn't,

Congress was given the power to create bills signed in to law by the Potus.

People/politicians have no rights to ignore them for benefit of their political parties.

You may want to read Article I of our Constitution, that is, if you're still confused ... you'll find a good bit there about the "effing need" for Congress.

a reply to: Dudemo5

I guess that, since my preferred channel on Pandora is "Westside Connection," I'm good.

a reply to: Gryphon66

Quote the constitution.

QUOTE.

QUOTE the exact passage that says we the people get to pick and choose what laws to follow.

I'll wait.

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: Gryphon66

Quote the constitution.

QUOTE.

QUOTE the exact passage that says we the people get to pick and choose what laws to follow.

I'll wait.

I haven't claimed that the Constitution says we can pick which laws we follow, that's YOUR argument.

You stated that there's "no effing need" for Congress, and that's absurd under our Constitution.