It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
“The sanctions send a strong message to Beijing and Moscow to stop facilitating North Korea’s sanctions evasion,” said Anthony Ruggiero, a fellow with the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, which favors tougher sanctions on Russia and China over North Korea. “The action is one element of a pressure campaign that also includes targeting illicit financial transactions and pressuring U.S. allies to choose between business with the United States or North Korea.”
ndrei Klimov, a senior legislator in Russia’s upper house of parliament, said U.S. sanctions “run counter not only to international law but also to common sense.” Russia, Klimov said, “must react in principle to this insane and confrontational policy.”
“These sanctions, per se, are illegal because the only thing that is recognized by international law are the U.N. Security Council sanctions,” Klimov told the Interfax news agency. “The rest is just made up illegally.”
The sanctions announced Tuesday by the Office of Foreign Assets Control were predominantly against Chinese companies that have dealt with North Korea by purchasing and selling coal, oil and mineral resources, or have provided banking services that made the transactions possible. The sanctions also hit two companies that arranged for North Korean laborers to build statues in foreign countries.
The sanctions hit three types of business dealings that provide a window into how North Korea uses companies in other countries to evade sanctions. China-based Dandong Rich Earth Trading Co. was sanctioned for buying vanadium ore from a company tied to North Korea’s atomic energy agency. The Russian firm Gefest-M, which trades in a wide range of consumer goods as well as construction and industrial equipment, allegedly procured metals for a North Korean mining company with a Moscow office. The Chinese company Mingzheng International Trading was accused of facilitating dollar transactions on behalf of North Korea’s proliferation network. In addition, three Chinese coal companies were sanctioned for importing nearly $500 million of North Korean coal between 2013 and 2016.
Story 3rd on the right of the page.
www.washingtonpost.com... rth-korea/2017/08/22/78992312-8743-11e7-961d-2f373b3977ee_story.html?utm_term=.853a530b1a24
Since the US will not "correct its mistake", either "immediately" or at any time, China will have no choice but to escalate, in the process making any credible diplomacy involving North Korea impossible, forcing" America's hand when it comes to North Korea, now that the diplomatic option is out of the picture.
I agree, especially with a communist state that has ambitions on unseating AND dominating the US. However, as a child, back in the mid 80s, sitting in a bathtub, I would often make note of my cheap plastic aquatic toys, the bottom stamped with a, "made in China".
originally posted by: seasonal
a reply to: Arnie123
Perhaps having almost everything made in China was a bad idea?
Imagine the fun the Chinese could have by not allowing specific components to be shipped to the US. The theory of everyone getting along because we are in each others business will be tested.
This is the interesting aspect of the article, there didn't seem to be any real action from beijing on NoKo anyways.
originally posted by: gortex
a reply to: Arnie123
Since the US will not "correct its mistake", either "immediately" or at any time, China will have no choice but to escalate, in the process making any credible diplomacy involving North Korea impossible, forcing" America's hand when it comes to North Korea, now that the diplomatic option is out of the picture.
I agree with zerohedge the move will be counterproductive , troubling times.
originally posted by: Justso
Economics is really our strongest and best response. Wish we didn't owe China so much money. Wonder how that will play into these sanctions.
Sure, but there wasn't any real action prior either, so with that being said, what recommendations do you see as viable?
originally posted by: gortex
a reply to: Arnie123
At a time when the US is looking for allies over this matter hitting their business with sanctions doesn't seem like a good idea , an angry China is not a good intermediary between the North Koreans and the US.
The sanctions will just end in more trade with the North and less cooperation with the problem at hand.
It smacks of the administration shooting themselves in the foot.
No, but this is out of response to their own issues.
originally posted by: gortex
originally posted by: Justso
a reply to: Arnie123
That is great to hear.
Not really , India doesn't have a problem with North Korea to sort out and boycotting is different to sanctioning.