It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: TerryMcGuire
why not just make statues illegal? ANY statue. Who knows who might be offended by it in the future.
Can you explain what if any statue hurt you or damaged your psyche?
why not just make statues illegal? ANY statue. Who knows who might be offended by it in the future.
originally posted by: xuenchen
Why wait 10 or 20 years?
Do it with every local/state/federal election.
Automatic referendum.
originally posted by: TonyS
a reply to: TerryMcGuire
Terry, you know, statues are kind of expensive to just be used for 10 to 20 years.
That said, I've sort of lost interest in the whole statue thing and I'd just as soon see them all taken down. All of them. In the US at least. I mean, lets face it, as fractured and factious as this society has become, its no longer the case that even 51% of the population could agree on an acceptable "statue". Elections for statues would of course be as hopelessly bogus as most all of our elections.
A pox on the damned statues!
originally posted by: TerryMcGuire
Statues should be erected for a term of 10 to 20 years.
originally posted by: DBCowboy
Maybe we should just write history books that only go back 5 years.
That way we won't offend anyone.
And the people who wants them gone are the same that wants freedom of speech
But they cannot see they are destroying that by censuring history in the streets
originally posted by: TerryMcGuire
a reply to: Spacespider
And the people who wants them gone are the same that wants freedom of speech
But they cannot see they are destroying that by censuring history in the streets
I do not disagree. But can't we come up with a better solution, a compromise to partially satisfy all sides of the issue?
originally posted by: TerryMcGuire
a reply to: Spacespider
And the people who wants them gone are the same that wants freedom of speech
But they cannot see they are destroying that by censuring history in the streets
I do not disagree. But can't we come up with a better solution, a compromise to partially satisfy all sides of the issue?
originally posted by: TonyS
a reply to: TerryMcGuire
Here's an idea for you, how about "holographic" statues. So, in the local mugging park in your village, you'd have a "base" where the old statue used to stand and in the base would be this like computer gadget that projects a holographic statuesque image or better yet......images, multiple images. So, the black female with her kid walks buy and they can project a statue of MLK or Jimmy Hendrix or whatever; a brown person can project an image of Che Gueverra or Fidel Castro, Selena; a white person walks by and they can push the button for Adolph Hitler, or Robert E. Lee or Townes Van Zandt; a gay person walks by and they can project a statue of Pee Wee Herman, or Rachel Maddow, whoever.
The more I think about it, the more I like it........its a beautiful thing! A veritable rogues gallery of statues could be projected, but only for 5 minutes each and only once a day..........no crappy elections needed.
And........it solves another problem! You mentioned artistic value; yea, the Venus de Milo, great artistic value. Modern statuary? Not so much. A lot of it looks kinda like a crayon left standing on its end in the sun too long. I mean, lets face it, modern art? You could collect dog crap on a big piece of cardboard and sell it to some rich person in NYC for a couple of million. But Holographic Statuary should eliminate that problem; no new images allowed, only old or life like images would be allowed.
Yep.........definitely.........problem SOLVED!