It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: annoyedpharmacist
This should be huge news.....which, of course, means it will get absolutely zero coverage.
originally posted by: queenofswords
a reply to: Perfectenemy
He also gave us another hint:
Trump has referred to D.C. as the “swamp” on a regular basis since the GOP primaries, but had a change of heart on Monday morning.
Potus tweeted, “Drain the Swamp should be changed to Drain the Sewer – it’s actually much worse than anyone ever thought, and it begins with the Fake News!”
It begins with the Fake News. That is not just rhetoric. The media and Dems are in bed together.
(BTW, before I forget about a little note in the margin of my mind, Kamala Harris' sister works at MSNBC as a political analyst. There is talk of Harris running for prez in 2020. The media groundwork is being laid. Please file this tidbit away. The MSM are in bed with the Democrat Party....They are indeed part of the sewer.)
originally posted by: iWontGiveUP
originally posted by: annoyedpharmacist
This should be huge news.....which, of course, means it will get absolutely zero coverage.
This is the "first LEAK" in quite some time...
Hmm...
Technically this is "sources" but it holds water!!!
originally posted by: annoyedpharmacist
This should be huge news.....which, of course, means it will get absolutely zero coverage.
originally posted by: Asktheanimals
Should this go unpunished I think the country really will implode.
We let the bankers walk before and even rewarded them for being criminals.
The public won't tolerate any more, especially when it's foreign nationals involved.
originally posted by: redtic
So, just to be clear, in this case anonymous sources and guilty before innocent is ok. Got it.
originally posted by: Perfectenemy
originally posted by: redtic
So, just to be clear, in this case anonymous sources and guilty before innocent is ok. Got it.
I'm following this case very closely hence my threads about it and me and other members found connections that are at least highly questionable. I'm still weirded out about the fact that the white house logs got scrubbed just shortly after Imran Awans arrest. This goes back probably back a decade. This is not about Trump mind you.
Edit: There are rumours that next week will be full of surprises and the hammer is about to fall. First we have the self-fulfilling prophecy of the Eclipse to take care of.
originally posted by: neo96
Federal authorities are investigating whether sensitive data was stolen from congressional offices by several Pakistani-American tech staffers and sold to Pakistani or Russian intelligence, knowledgeable sources say.
WE TOLD YOU SO.
All that Russian snip was a false flag to cover up the DNC'S incompetence.
originally posted by: redtic
So, just to be clear, in this case anonymous sources and guilty before innocent is ok. Got it.
originally posted by: redtic
originally posted by: Perfectenemy
originally posted by: redtic
So, just to be clear, in this case anonymous sources and guilty before innocent is ok. Got it.
I'm following this case very closely hence my threads about it and me and other members found connections that are at least highly questionable. I'm still weirded out about the fact that the white house logs got scrubbed just shortly after Imran Awans arrest. This goes back probably back a decade. This is not about Trump mind you.
Edit: There are rumours that next week will be full of surprises and the hammer is about to fall. First we have the self-fulfilling prophecy of the Eclipse to take care of.
Nope, not about Trump. And I don't want to be claiming "double standard" where it's unwarranted, but it surely sounds like one based on the NYP article and OP/responses on the first page.
originally posted by: JinMI
originally posted by: redtic
So, just to be clear, in this case anonymous sources and guilty before innocent is ok. Got it.
Indictments are a good indication, in this case 4. Would you like to wager that he will not see a trial and more than likely reduced charges?