What would be the Soviet Union's reaction to the current civil unrest in the US and Europe?

In the 1980s, a Soviet Defector named Yuri Bezmenov warned about the rise of Regressive Leftists and how they are connected to the Soviet Union.



After seeing incidents like Berkeley, the CNN blackmail incident, Youtube demonetization, and Charlottesville, I wonder what would be the Soviet Union's reaction if they didn't crumble in 1989 and is still around today?

What if Antifa and other Regressive Leftist groups were secretly lead by Soviet sleeper agents that got activated too late?

What if all these civil unrest was originally designed to not only weaken America, but to make way for a possible Soviet Invasion?

With the US totally in disarray, the Soviets would have took advantage of this opening.

Many of these SJW/Regressive Leftists love Communism and would have welcomed invading Soviet forces like these one Communist anti-white white girl:



Many of members of the Regressive Left such as Maxine Waters and Angela Davis are Communists and it me makes wonder if they are one of the many Soviet sleeper agents Yuri warned us about.

Also, how would the Soviets react to Western Europe in disarray? I mean with the actions of Angela Merkel and other regressive leftists, I'm pretty sure the Soviets would have invaded most of Western Europe without firing a shot.

a reply to: starwarsisreal

Firing squads, gulags, beatings...

a reply to: Bluntone22

If the Soviet Union were to take over the US, many of these SJWs would be more than happy to collaborate with them.

a reply to: starwarsisreal

According to the right wing narrative, Nazis are socialist. So wouldn't it make more sense that the Nazis are the ones that are sleeper agents?

Or is that not convenient here?

a reply to: underwerks

According the history books both the nazis and the communists called themselves socialists.

To wit.

However, contrary to Western usage, these states do not describe themselves as "communist" nor do they claim to have achieved communism; they refer to themselves as Socialist states or Workers' states that are in the process of constructing socialism

en.wikipedia.org...

On topic.

The world is backasswards.

Russia is now capitalist.

And we got a bunch of commies running around 'Murica' trying to fight the natzees.

Bunch of Brad Pit wanna be's.



At any rate.

The United States of dysfunction has gone full retard.

originally posted by: starwarsisreal
a reply to: Bluntone22

If the Soviet Union were to take over the US, many of these SJWs would be more than happy to collaborate with them.

I would think that the sjw's might look at the Russians "not soviet" handling of gays and might have a problem with that.

originally posted by: Bluntone22

originally posted by: starwarsisreal
a reply to: Bluntone22

If the Soviet Union were to take over the US, many of these SJWs would be more than happy to collaborate with them.

I would think that the sjw's might look at the Russians "not soviet" handling of gays and might have a problem with that.

Since Putin is a billionaire oligarch.

They'd call him a 'fascist'.

And his stance on gay rights.

a reply to: Bluntone22

They are useful idiots though. Even if they won't cooperate they still play into their divide and conquer schemes.

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: underwerks

According the history books both the nazis and the communists called themselves socialists.

To wit.

However, contrary to Western usage, these states do not describe themselves as "communist" nor do they claim to have achieved communism; they refer to themselves as Socialist states or Workers' states that are in the process of constructing socialism

en.wikipedia.org...

On topic.

The world is backasswards.

Russia is now capitalist.

And we got a bunch of commies running around 'Murica' trying to fight the natzees.

Bunch of Brad Pit wanna be's.

At any rate.

The United States of dysfunction has gone full retard.

Then why did the Nazis round up the socialists and communists with the Jews and everyone else?

The "socialist" in the Nazi party name back then doesn't hold the same meaning as socialist does in America in 2017.

a reply to: underwerks

The "socialist" in the Nazi party name back then doesn't hold the same meaning as socialist does in America in 2017.

Yes it did.

It is already war history how the German Armies defeated the legions of capitalism and plutocracy. After forty-five days this campaign in the West was equally and emphatically terminated. Berlin: Hitler’s Order of the Day Calling for Invasion of Yugoslovia and Greece (April 6, 1941)

To put it quite clearly: we have an economic programme. Point No. 13 in that programme demands the nationalisation of all public companies, in other words socialisation, or what is known here as socialism. … the basic principle of my Party’s economic programme should be made perfectly clear and that is the principle of authority… the good of the community takes priority over that of the individual. But the State should retain control; every owner should feel himself to be an agent of the State; it is his duty not to misuse his possessions to the detriment of the State or the interests of his fellow countrymen. That is the overriding point. The Third Reich will always retain the right to control property owners. If you say that the bourgeoisie is tearing its hair over the question of private property, that does not affect me in the least. Does the bourgeoisie expect some consideration from me?… Today’s bourgeoisie is rotten to the core; it has no ideals any more; all it wants to do is earn money and so it does me what damage it can. The bourgeois press does me damage too and would like to consign me and my movement to the devil.

en.wikiquote.org...

Read the rest.

a reply to: neo96

That's still not what socialism is seen as today. I doubt the Nazis were Bernie bros..

I would think that Russia does have operatives in our country that promote civil unrest, the US and EU have plenty in Russia. Yes, they could be working with a group like Antifa, but I doubt if Antifa would even be aware of it. The big corporations and some government agencies have put people into groups that defy them to lead the group into chaos and consequency get some of their members arrested. There were even some agricultural agencies and big groups that incited turmoil among the small farmers and coops that would not follow along with what they wanted. They wanted all our food to come from places the government could control.

Russia most certainly is working to cause turmoil here, and we and all countries are trying to cause turmoil in other countries we are not allied with. That is how things work. The US is probably the best in the world at doing this because they are very experienced and have the money to back the rebel groups.

Is it happening with Antifa? I don't know, but I know someone is giving them money to fund their civil unrest.

a reply to: rickymouse

I wouldn't be surprised if Fat Boy has a hand on this too, since they praised his grandfather:

originally posted by: underwerks
a reply to: neo96

That's still not what socialism is seen as today. I doubt the Nazis were Bernie bros..

But we National Socialists wish precisely to attract all socialists, even the Communists; we wish to win them over from their international camp to the national one.

en.wikiquote.org...

Katyusa (Катюша) - Valeria Kurnushkina & Red Army Choir (2014)

But ...

RUSSIA !!

originally posted by: starwarsisreal
If the Soviet Union were to take over the US, many of these SJWs would be more than happy to collaborate with them.

No, the SWJs would have been first against the wall. The last thing dictatorships want are people with opinions. It seems that some SWJs cannot handle other people's opinions, so they perhaps want to run the dictatorship. That's the problem with pigeon-holed politics.