It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
However, contrary to Western usage, these states do not describe themselves as "communist" nor do they claim to have achieved communism; they refer to themselves as Socialist states or Workers' states that are in the process of constructing socialism
originally posted by: starwarsisreal
a reply to: Bluntone22
If the Soviet Union were to take over the US, many of these SJWs would be more than happy to collaborate with them.
originally posted by: Bluntone22
originally posted by: starwarsisreal
a reply to: Bluntone22
If the Soviet Union were to take over the US, many of these SJWs would be more than happy to collaborate with them.
I would think that the sjw's might look at the Russians "not soviet" handling of gays and might have a problem with that.
originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: underwerks
According the history books both the nazis and the communists called themselves socialists.
To wit.
However, contrary to Western usage, these states do not describe themselves as "communist" nor do they claim to have achieved communism; they refer to themselves as Socialist states or Workers' states that are in the process of constructing socialism
en.wikipedia.org...
On topic.
The world is backasswards.
Russia is now capitalist.
And we got a bunch of commies running around 'Murica' trying to fight the natzees.
Bunch of Brad Pit wanna be's.
At any rate.
The United States of dysfunction has gone full retard.
The "socialist" in the Nazi party name back then doesn't hold the same meaning as socialist does in America in 2017.
It is already war history how the German Armies defeated the legions of capitalism and plutocracy. After forty-five days this campaign in the West was equally and emphatically terminated. Berlin: Hitler’s Order of the Day Calling for Invasion of Yugoslovia and Greece (April 6, 1941)
To put it quite clearly: we have an economic programme. Point No. 13 in that programme demands the nationalisation of all public companies, in other words socialisation, or what is known here as socialism. … the basic principle of my Party’s economic programme should be made perfectly clear and that is the principle of authority… the good of the community takes priority over that of the individual. But the State should retain control; every owner should feel himself to be an agent of the State; it is his duty not to misuse his possessions to the detriment of the State or the interests of his fellow countrymen. That is the overriding point. The Third Reich will always retain the right to control property owners. If you say that the bourgeoisie is tearing its hair over the question of private property, that does not affect me in the least. Does the bourgeoisie expect some consideration from me?… Today’s bourgeoisie is rotten to the core; it has no ideals any more; all it wants to do is earn money and so it does me what damage it can. The bourgeois press does me damage too and would like to consign me and my movement to the devil.
originally posted by: underwerks
a reply to: neo96
That's still not what socialism is seen as today. I doubt the Nazis were Bernie bros..
But we National Socialists wish precisely to attract all socialists, even the Communists; we wish to win them over from their international camp to the national one.
originally posted by: starwarsisreal
If the Soviet Union were to take over the US, many of these SJWs would be more than happy to collaborate with them.