Looks like Assange is about to drop the hammer.

a reply to: theultimatebelgianjoke

Just when I thought the delusions couldn't get any more absurd someone treats it as a challenge.

What's worse than jumping the shark?

Whether or not Assange drops critical info, what Wikileaks has published to date has made visible what many in power wish had remained hidden.

originally posted by: UnBreakable

originally posted by: introvert
Both Assange and Hannity have proven themselves to be attention whores, while not providing much substance to their claims.

They need to really come through on this or they stand to further discredit themselves.

Kinda like Rachel Maddow and her claim to having recent Trump's taxes, while actually showing a seven year old return published previously in the NY Times. Talk about a whore.

except this thread isn't about Maddox supposedly having info or "dropping the hammer," so that's Co pletely irrelevant. Nice attempt at deflection, though. But the fact remains that nary a week goes by without a bunch of getting worked up because Assange/wiki leaks is supposedly about to drop a bombshell, and nothing ever actually happens. Luckily for him, you're all dumb enough and gullible enough to keep falling for it time and time again.

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: Sillyolme

I know it hurts, but it will be fine, I assure you:

Host Sean Hannity: “Can you say to the American people unequivocally that you did not get this information about the DNC, John Podesta’s emails — can you tell the American people 1,000 percent you did not get it from Russia . . . “

Julian Assange: “Yes.” Hannity: “. . . or anybody associated with Russia?”

Assange: “We — we can say and we have said repeatedly . . . “

Hannity: “Right.”

Assange: “. . . over the last two months, that our source is not the Russian government and it is not a state party.”

— exchange on “Hannity” on Fox News, Jan. 3, 2017

HACKERS using malware created by a Ukranian (who the FBI is TALKING TO) did it. Those hackers take orders FROM Russia but aren't directly employed by Russia.

So..technically Assange can say this. BUT -- Russia was behind it.

originally posted by: DanteGaland

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: Sillyolme

I know it hurts, but it will be fine, I assure you:

Host Sean Hannity: “Can you say to the American people unequivocally that you did not get this information about the DNC, John Podesta’s emails — can you tell the American people 1,000 percent you did not get it from Russia . . . “

Julian Assange: “Yes.” Hannity: “. . . or anybody associated with Russia?”

Assange: “We — we can say and we have said repeatedly . . . “

Hannity: “Right.”

Assange: “. . . over the last two months, that our source is not the Russian government and it is not a state party.”

— exchange on “Hannity” on Fox News, Jan. 3, 2017

HACKERS using malware created by a Ukranian (who the FBI is TALKING TO) did it. Those hackers take orders FROM Russia but aren't directly employed by Russia.

So..technically Assange can say this. BUT -- Russia was behind it.

Quite possible Russia hacked Hillarys Private Email Server, anyone could have and prob did

Podesta was hacked too!

The DNC emails were leaked

End of story

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: introvert
Both Assange and Hannity have proven themselves to be attention whores, while not providing much substance to their claims.

They need to really come through on this or they stand to further discredit themselves.

Let me know when Assange provides equal info on the Right.

Or any info against the Right.

Notice how Assange is trying to make a deal to get out of the embassy, with Republicans?

I didn't think about that. It makes a lot of sense, though. I'm with others -- wake me up when he has something that doesn't target the U.S.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: interupt42

They're counterfeit.
More Russian interference. They're still at it.
Still trying to smear Clinton.

LOL, when in doubt go to the Russians huh. I would have at least thought you would have played the nazi card.

Who is counterfeit? What Russians? The Russians had nothing do with Hillary corruption riddled campaign that was in cahoots with the DNC and the MSM to cheat and make her the front runner for the DNC. The Russians had nothing do with the disgraced DWS nor her scandalous conflict of interest and connections with Hillary and the DNC. Nor did they force Hillary to hire DWS after she disgracefully forced to resign.

Nor did the Russians really care about the tacobowl.

a reply to: iWontGiveUP

To BAD the guy who MADE the malware program ADMITTED it, and is actively working with the FBI...

originally posted by: DanteGaland
a reply to: iWontGiveUP

To BAD the guy who MADE the malware program ADMITTED it, and is actively working with the FBI...

Guccifer?

Yup, and your point?

a reply to: norhoc
Your not thinking straight. If he reveals his sources to anyone he loses all credibility and no one will give him anything

originally posted by: UnBreakable
a reply to: norhoc

But...but...Trump bad...Russia collusion...

Funny thing is .. there are two streets in London called "Trump Street" and "Russia Row" right next to each other.

goo.gl...

originally posted by: stormcell

originally posted by: UnBreakable
a reply to: norhoc

But...but...Trump bad...Russia collusion...

Funny thing is .. there are two streets in London called "Trump Street" and "Russia Row" right next to each other.

goo.gl...

Collusion with the Queen, what?

Spread the gnus far and wide!

Trump Russia and the Queen

a reply to: oddnutz

I'm supposing the Nazis slithering out of their sewer to march on Charlottesville had nothing to do with media coverage of...well... Nazis in Charlottesville. Are we just not supposed to cover news anymore, or should they just cover the news that you deem worthy enough for the rest of us to hear?

a reply to: norhoc

Even if he holds up the smoking gun, it will be omitted, down played and ridiculed in the main stream news, social media, and here.

Truth is ever deeper buried under a ton of banality and toppled icons.

It is not enough for Assange to tell us where the leaked emails come from. The source of the emails will have to prove where the emails came from and how they were obtained. Presumably Assange has that proof, at least. Anything short of it is not enough.

originally posted by: DanteGaland

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: Sillyolme

I know it hurts, but it will be fine, I assure you:

Host Sean Hannity: “Can you say to the American people unequivocally that you did not get this information about the DNC, John Podesta’s emails — can you tell the American people 1,000 percent you did not get it from Russia . . . “

Julian Assange: “Yes.” Hannity: “. . . or anybody associated with Russia?”

Assange: “We — we can say and we have said repeatedly . . . “

Hannity: “Right.”

Assange: “. . . over the last two months, that our source is not the Russian government and it is not a state party.”

— exchange on “Hannity” on Fox News, Jan. 3, 2017

HACKERS using malware created by a Ukranian (who the FBI is TALKING TO) did it. Those hackers take orders FROM Russia but aren't directly employed by Russia.

So..technically Assange can say this. BUT -- Russia was behind it.

Great theory. Have proof?

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: DanteGaland

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: Sillyolme

I know it hurts, but it will be fine, I assure you:

Host Sean Hannity: “Can you say to the American people unequivocally that you did not get this information about the DNC, John Podesta’s emails — can you tell the American people 1,000 percent you did not get it from Russia . . . “

Julian Assange: “Yes.” Hannity: “. . . or anybody associated with Russia?”

Assange: “We — we can say and we have said repeatedly . . . “

Hannity: “Right.”

Assange: “. . . over the last two months, that our source is not the Russian government and it is not a state party.”

— exchange on “Hannity” on Fox News, Jan. 3, 2017

HACKERS using malware created by a Ukranian (who the FBI is TALKING TO) did it. Those hackers take orders FROM Russia but aren't directly employed by Russia.

So..technically Assange can say this. BUT -- Russia was behind it.

Great theory. Have proof?

Sure:

A Ukrainian malware author who built the PAS Web shell—a PHP-based implant used to execute commands remotely on hacked systems—has turned himself in to Ukrainian authorities. He has been cooperating with the Federal Bureau of Investigation's probe into the apparent Russian hacking of the Democratic National Committee. The information provided by "Profexor" to Ukrainian investigators and the FBI reveals, in part, how hackers (who were apparently coordinated by a Russian intelligence agency) used a combination of purpose-built and community tools as part of what researchers have labeled as the threat group "APT 28," also known as "Fancy Bear."

ArsTechnica

LOTS of details. Enjoy.

But what about muh 23mbs?!?! I KNOW...right?

a reply to: DanteGaland

They, unlike yourself, doesn't sound too certain.

The information provided by "Profexor" to Ukrainian investigators and the FBI reveals, in part, how hackers (who were apparently coordinated by a Russian intelligence agency) used a combination of purpose-built and community tools as part of what researchers have labeled as the threat group "APT 28," also known as "Fancy Bear."

Also not evidence that Russians did it.

a reply to: JinMI

Sounds pretty certain to ME.

a reply to: DanteGaland

I'm certain it does. To myself and anyone else that requires burden of proof over first hand testimony, not so much.

What Profexor may very well provide is the tools and whom he may know has them. What it doesn't yet show is if those are the only folks who have them or the directing entity by proxy if even need be.