Fusion GPS= Paid by DNC, Paid by Jeb, Paid By Russia= unregistered lobbyists= foreign agents

originally posted by: AndyFromMichigan
How does Jeb Bush fit into this?

Not that I would doubt it: The Bushes are as "Deep State" as you get. Jeb's daddy is a former head of the CIA, you know.

Don't forget brother Marvin Bush who just happened to be Head of Security to MOST of the buildings felled on 9/11..

originally posted by: theantediluvian
a reply to: ChrisM101

Fusion GPS was hired by DNC, and by a Republican Super PAC thought to be bolstering Jeb Bush at the time.

Do you have any evidence that Fusion GPS was hired by the DNC? The DNC isn't synonymous with "Democratic donors" or "a Democratic PAC," etc.

How about evidence that the original funding was from a Super PAC supporting Jeb Bush?

And of course the Trash senators involved (former) Dellmus and Dana Rohrabacher

Rohrabacher and Dellums shouldn't be an afterthought, they're more involved than anyone and Rohrabacher is a sitting Representative who appears to be taking direction from the Kremlin. How this isn't a bigger deal is beyond me. It's not like everyone is entirely oblivious here. Paul Behrends was canned for his involvement, reportedly under pressure from Rep. Ed Royce.

DNC hired Fusion to "validate the DNC server hack" but wouldnt turn them over to the FBI and instead gave crowd strike access to them...

Remember this all started with the supposed hack into the DNC email system.

Per Comey, the FBI did not physically examine the DNC server to look for evidence of Russia. The DNC server was not made available to the FBI.

The FBI then relied on the examination of the server by a private security company called FusionGPS as the source of validation of the Russia hack, per Comey.

Jeb and Right to Rise SuperPAC was originally reported in the UK, as the wealthy republican donor link who initiated this Dossier investigation in 2015.

a reply to: ChrisM101



It's dubbed in Russian and has no subtitles ... I hope someone will deliver a more english-speaker friendly version soon.
Or, it could also be removed by the deep-state shenigans.



a reply to: ChrisM101

Didn't they hire Crowdstrike - not Fusion GPS - to validate the claim ?

a reply to: theultimatebelgianjoke

This was what was told, initially, so there's CSPAN to check. brb






No one ever names crowdstrike by name.

Thus FBI information is Heresay by 3rd party Crowdstrike...Owned by Dmitri Alperovitch, Whom i can find little origin detail on, other than he was a big guy at McAfee at some point. Sounds very Russian ... BTW didnt someone just try to kill MCAfee?

a reply to: theultimatebelgianjoke

Crowdstrike was the IT firm that looked at it but who hired them is a important question . We have just assumed it was the DNC but it may not have been ....mmmmm

a reply to: the2ofusr1

A little ot but a past dot to hold onto and maybe keep in mind when trying to make sense os this story

a reply to: the2ofusr1

Crowdstrike...Owned by Dmitri Alperovitch

Born in Moscow

Came to the US at 16... But he's an expert...

a reply to: ChrisM101

Unless being born in Russia is a crime ...

CrowdStrike: Five Things Everyone Is Ignoring About The Russia-DNC Story

1. Obama Appoints CrowdStrike Officer To Admin Post Two Months Before June 2016 Report On Russia Hacking DNC

2. The FBI Never Looked At The DNC’s Servers — Only CrowdStrike Did

3. Comey Contradicted The DNC’s Story On The FBI Asking To See The Server

4. CrowdStrike Co-Founder Is Fellow On Russia Hawk Group, Has Connections To George Soros, Ukrainian Billionaire

5. CrowdStrike Is Funded By Clinton-Loving Google $$

What I find totally sureal with the DNC hack/FBI investigation is that the DNC do tell the FBI to GTFO and have a private contractor doing the research. Next time a policeman tries to stop you, go tell him to go F... himself and that you would rather have your own lawyer taking over its job, you'll see what his reaction will be.

One other thing to bear in mind : it is not the FBI role to lift the vail on the CIA questionable behaviour. When it comes to Russian framing :

a reply to: theultimatebelgianjoke

Although Lee goes into a bit of a rant in this vid he does remind his readers that Crowdstrike retracted its report on the Russian hacking Ukraine artillery but also points out the the MSM did not . He also has some good points with dates and comments made that contradict the MSM talking points to whats shaping up to be the Manaford Narrative . Also a very important dot to keep in mind as this plays out . I am sure Muller and team have been working overtime to try to dig them out of this . It actually may end being that the US going to war with NK was probably started over this to bury it all .

a reply to: the2ofusr1

"Something Stinks Here" - CrowdStrike Revises, Retracts Parts Of Explosive Russian Hacking Report

Here’s the problem. Yes, the FBI has agreed with CrowdStrike’s conclusion, but the FBI did not analyze the DNC servers because the DNC specifically denied the FBI access. This was noteworthy in its own right, but it takes on vastly increased significance given the serious errors in a related hacking report produced by the company.

As such, serious questions need to be asked. Why did FBI head James Comey outsource his job to CrowdStrike, and why did he heap praise on the company? For instance, back in January, Comey referred to CrowdStrike as a “highly respected private company.”

It is also Crowdstrike that issued a bogus report stating that the Russians had hacked Ukrainian artillery units. It was so bogus that even the Ukrainians denied it.

a reply to: theultimatebelgianjoke

Seems to me that Crowdstrike is nothing more then a proxy for covert FBI/CIA propaganda . Just as the Steel Dossier was created and turned out to be BS one has to assume Crowdstrike's work has equal quality .

Not that the being Russian is a crime, but in the case that he may be, working for Fusion which has been operating as an unregistered agent of the Russian Government.

Further, they act like it was nothing to see that DNC was being hacked. They found it literally within minutes.
Months after the FBI informed them. They found two "russian" groups targeting DNC, FANCY BEAR and COZY BEAR.

Now for one, after reading some of the wikileaks from CIA tactics myself, I would have no problem believing that the CIA dropped these markers in the server pointing to these groups. They have the ability to do so.

There is also the question as to Why the NSA was in the hearing for this, and kept saying we dont touch that, its not our operating area.

Its really hard to see why neither of them could not answer whether this was mere phishing, spearphishing, or zero day exploit. I feel they are holding back the fact that it was possibly just a local instance of software installation, or just a blatant copy to a thumb drive.

Crowdstrike was used by the DNC before to dump Bernie out of their computers after they accessed Hillary data.

wikileaks email DNC

The DNC and the Sanders campaign agreed on the retention of CrowdStrike to conduct the investigation. Over a five-week period and the commitment to the work of 128 hours, CrowdStrike examined user activity within VoteBuilder by three Democratic Presidential campaigns: Hillary for America, Bernie 2016, and O'Malley for President. Additionally, CrowdStrike conducted a forensic examination of two systems belonging to the Bernie 2016 campaign. The investigation sought to first identify whether any campaigns' users accessed data via the VoteBuilder system in an unauthorized fashion and then determine the nature of any unauthorized access that did occur. The cybersecurity firm CrowdStrike has concluded the independent investigation agreed to by the DNC and Bernie 2016. It identified evidence of unauthorized access via four user accounts from the Bernie 2016 campaign. All unauthorized access occurred during a one-hour period from 10:41 to 11:42 EST on December 16, 2015.

Now what is striking here is that no sophisticated tools where used, it was a known access of a known database from a known group of users, during a known timeframe. Yet Crowdstrike took 5 weeks and 128 hours to complete it?