It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Metallicus
originally posted by: Dudemo5
If you want to help him, vote DEM. The Republicans clearly can't get anything done AT ALL. They are a broken, fragmented party. They've gerrymandered their districts to the point that little enclaves of politicians who can't lose now exist, and they will not work toward mutually agreeable goals with the rest of their party.
Of course, there is the little problem that a DEM Congress will probably impeach Trump and remove him from office. But let's be honest. At this rate, there's a real good chance that's going to happen regardless of which party controls Congress, whether he colluded with Russia or not.
Voting Dem won't help Trump or his agenda.
You may have missed the point of my OP...do you have anything to add that would actually help him accomplish his agenda?
We already know Democrats won't help.
originally posted by: Metallicus
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: Metallicus
Republicans passing a middle-class tax cut would help A LOT. Democrat leaders, in concert with the Liberal MSM, are also helping.
I completely agree.
Term limits and tax cuts will help, but the problem is he can't do any of it with all the Globalist a-holes in Congress. We need to send a message to Congress without making it worse.
originally posted by: Dudemo5
originally posted by: RazorV66
originally posted by: Dudemo5
If you want to help him, vote DEM.
If that statement wasn't so sad, it would be hilarious.
We want to help Trump make the country better, not flush it farther down the sh!tter by voting Demwits.
The truth is, the country will be better if our politicians govern toward the middle. Unfortunately, political discourse in this country has driven the most vocal among us (especially on the internet) into camps of Left or Right. Our politicians are following suit, especially in the ultra-gerrymandered districts where they only cater to conservatives.
Purple districts have been gerrymandered practically out of existence.
The real solution to this is to end closed primaries and put an end to politically motivated districting.
But if that can't happen, at least a DEM Congress would be forced to put together more "middle of the road" legislation if they wanted Trump to sign it.
In a less partisan world, anyway. To be honest, I'm not sure it's even possible in this environment.
originally posted by: Dudemo5
You know WHY Congress couldn't get the ACA repealed?
Because Congress was LISTENING to their constituents. They were hearing almost entirely from people who DID NOT WANT THE ACA REPEALED in any of the ways they were proposing.
Trump didn't do very much to get people motivated. I mean, it's kinda hard when every day he's distracting the news cycle with goofy tweets and unforced mistakes. Seriously, this guy isn't a serious force for any legislative change.
originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: carewemust
They can both sod off. Parties got us where we are today.
originally posted by: RazorV66
originally posted by: Dudemo5
originally posted by: RazorV66
originally posted by: Dudemo5
If you want to help him, vote DEM.
If that statement wasn't so sad, it would be hilarious.
We want to help Trump make the country better, not flush it farther down the sh!tter by voting Demwits.
The truth is, the country will be better if our politicians govern toward the middle. Unfortunately, political discourse in this country has driven the most vocal among us (especially on the internet) into camps of Left or Right. Our politicians are following suit, especially in the ultra-gerrymandered districts where they only cater to conservatives.
Purple districts have been gerrymandered practically out of existence.
The real solution to this is to end closed primaries and put an end to politically motivated districting.
But if that can't happen, at least a DEM Congress would be forced to put together more "middle of the road" legislation if they wanted Trump to sign it.
In a less partisan world, anyway. To be honest, I'm not sure it's even possible in this environment.
You would have better luck finding a purple unicorn especially with the divisiveness that the Dems/Leftists spew on a continuous basis.
Voting more of them would be utterly useless. After all, the Dems are experts at gerrymandering considering all the effort they put in to getting the inner city vote across the country.
originally posted by: AutonomousMeatPuppet
originally posted by: Dudemo5
You know WHY Congress couldn't get the ACA repealed?
Because Congress was LISTENING to their constituents. They were hearing almost entirely from people who DID NOT WANT THE ACA REPEALED in any of the ways they were proposing.
Trump didn't do very much to get people motivated. I mean, it's kinda hard when every day he's distracting the news cycle with goofy tweets and unforced mistakes. Seriously, this guy isn't a serious force for any legislative change.
I think most people have spoken for several years now, and Congress voting to repeal ACA some 50 odd times gave them confidence that their voices were heard. This should have been a shoe in.
originally posted by: AutonomousMeatPuppet
originally posted by: Dudemo5
You know WHY Congress couldn't get the ACA repealed?
Because Congress was LISTENING to their constituents. They were hearing almost entirely from people who DID NOT WANT THE ACA REPEALED in any of the ways they were proposing.
Trump didn't do very much to get people motivated. I mean, it's kinda hard when every day he's distracting the news cycle with goofy tweets and unforced mistakes. Seriously, this guy isn't a serious force for any legislative change.
I know there is a huge push to flood town hall meetings by liberals. You think that swayed Congress?
I think most people have spoken for several years now, and Congress voting to repeal ACA some 50 odd times gave them confidence that their voices were heard. This should have been a shoe in.
originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: carewemust
Issue basis would be a great idea.
Having 2 parties dictate one of two possible value sets is an impossible argument.
originally posted by: AutonomousMeatPuppet
a reply to: Dudemo5
They had the option to repeal, they voted not to. That was what they were supposed to do.
They really showed their true colors. So now we have a better idea of who is honest.
I'd like to see Trump (and Rand Paul) get involved with picking replacements for anyone up for reelection. That's the only way I would really get motivated. Right now, I assume all candidates are corrupt and looking for a payday at our expense. I'm not very enthusiastic to throw my vote in as a crap shoot.
originally posted by: Dudemo5
originally posted by: AutonomousMeatPuppet
a reply to: Dudemo5
They had the option to repeal, they voted not to. That was what they were supposed to do.
They really showed their true colors. So now we have a better idea of who is honest.
I'd like to see Trump (and Rand Paul) get involved with picking replacements for anyone up for reelection. That's the only way I would really get motivated. Right now, I assume all candidates are corrupt and looking for a payday at our expense. I'm not very enthusiastic to throw my vote in as a crap shoot.
Trump promised a repeal and replace. The people in their districts did not want the replacements they came up with, and they didn't want the straight repeal either.
They were listening to their constituents.
Maybe they could come up with a plan their constituents want, but I find this to be unlikely given the ham-handed nonsense they came up with this time around.
originally posted by: AutonomousMeatPuppet
Previously, most Senators and Representatives have been able to keep their motives and agendas hidden.
Now that they are being forced to expose themselves, Trump could really help by vouching for some honest Conservatives to run in the next Republican primaries.
Major lobby reform would take most of the temptation out of the job to keep those elected honest.