Official TR3-B Patents - proof of anti-grav & wormhole hyperspace travel

a reply to: Zaphod58

Thanks for the intelligent and thoughtful response.

Though we can currently build spacecraft in an orbital dockyard I'm afraid the funding won't be there for decades to come...

originally posted by: BASSPLYR
a reply to: Zaphod58

Lockheeds good at that sort of PR. They like to send tacit messages.

tacit blue? lol.

a reply to: yuppa

around 2036 midnight before 2037

im pretty sure the original astr0 never said this

originally posted by: humanoidlord
a reply to: yuppa

around 2036 midnight before 2037

im pretty sure the original astr0 never said this

We have a PM system for a reason.

a reply to: yuppa

hmmmm....

a reply to: yuppa

but more seriously why do you believe him?

He also invented:
RE MOTE VIEWING AMPLIFIER

FU LL BODY TELEPORTATION SYSTEM

CAVITATING OIL HYPERSPACE ENERGY GENERATOR

/sigh

a reply to: clay2 baraka

Told you the patents were garbage.

originally posted by: humanoidlord
a reply to: yuppa

but more seriously why do you believe him?

Seeing is believing is all i will say. anything more breaks a promise and ill not do that to something shown to me in confidence.

originally posted by: BASSPLYR
a reply to: clay2 baraka

Told you the patents were garbage.

True. But there was a patent about plasma creating vacuum portals to reduce drag on aircraft there somewhere.

Plasmas good for Stealth too Ive heard .

a reply to: yuppa

I'll bite. Disinformation. Get the patents you need and create a batch of crappy ones to discredit the 1 or 2 legit ones?..

I'll admit, it's possible.

a reply to: clay2 baraka

Except they have a whole classified patent system. They can classify a patent and it won't see the light of day.

a reply to: Zaphod58

I did not know that, thank you.

Sooo, your'e saying the TR-3 is real?

/runs

a reply to: clay2 baraka

One day I'm going to answer with "yes" and watch the meltdown.

a reply to: Zaphod58

They built them, I've seen them and know where they are mothballed. Not only was size and weight a problem, but more importantly they leaked radioactive isotopes all over the place. The things look like the guts of some imperial star cruiser crash landed on our planet. They are ginormous.

As for the patents, they are crap as far as I can tell. They use 'conventional' Einstein field theories. The interaction between the electromagnetic field and gravity is too weak to be of any use.

However I have also been eyewitness to an early TR-3b prototype in flight over the San Francisco bay area. I can only imagine what they have now. I assure you it's not using Sinclair's patent for the gravity nulling.

a reply to: SevenThunders

So, I'll bite. Still entirely skeptical despite seeing a large floating craft as a child (stealth blimp, I believe).

What did the tri service designation for TR-3 represent? What was its popular name (i.e. "viper")?
What year did you witness the test?
Who operated it?

a reply to: clay2 baraka

It was not my intent to mislead you. The nuclear reactor powered jet was shown to me at a certain military installation by military personnel. I won't say more.

The viewing of the TR-3 is essentially a "UFO" sighting. The latter happened in 1979. The craft was triangular, dome on bottom, lights underneath at each corner. Looks very much like the pictures and drawings of the supposed TR-3.

a reply to: SevenThunders

You know an awful lot for knowing awful little.. I doubt the designation/program name falls under a security oath. hmm..

originally posted by: clay2 baraka
a reply to: SevenThunders

You know an awful lot for knowing awful little.. I doubt the designation/program name falls under a security oath. hmm..

My take on this stuff is that a lot of the UFO mumbo jumbo is a smokescreen, or disinformation if you will, to hide interesting classified technologies.

As far as program names, some as you must know are unacknowledged, so even the names themselves can not be revealed, because ahem, they don't exist LOL.