'Brit Police told me Diana was MURDERED'

a reply to: EvilAxis

They were not going to have the future king of the Commonwealth and head of the Anglican church having a brother whom was a Muslim so someone and not necessarily anyone in the royal family though a certain now retired member is my own top suspect as is a certain now stepped back duke whom is his son, they remain only suspect and may be completely innocent.

However this definitely was ordered by some very powerful member'(s) of the establishment - the old establishment whom still own most of what used to be the British Empire believe it or not as well as substantial holding outside of what used to be the empire all around the globe and though you can not see there wealth they make the sultan of Brunei look like a pauper.

www.scotsman.com...
Note how someone has blocked the information on this old newspaper page (if you are were I am anyway the line's are grey ascii blocks' with no font.
Here it is again though
www.dailymail.co.uk...
www.express.co.uk...
www.dailymail.co.uk...

She was murdered, members of the government are nothing but criminals' (we know that anyway of course) whom colluded in a cover up - which we also all expected to happen and a whitewash of the fact's with many left out such as the witness whom saw Diana walk from the car with her arm in a bandage and get into the back of the ambulance herself, she was murdered on route and must have put up as much of a fight as she could which is why it took over an hour for a 5 to 10 minute journey.

originally posted by: lordcomac
There are no accidents in politics.

Nope ... I agree.

And that slut knew exactly what she was doing. If the royals had her killed ... I'd have to give them a pass.

originally posted by: tadaman
a reply to: notsure1

She wouldnt do more than sign her name in daily life.

If you dont write often enough, your handwriting gets messy.

Thats not true. She wrote a lot of letters herself. Especially when she was promoting a land-mine free globe.

a reply to: tadaman

Good points... and hi, Tadman... long time no reply!

Imagine the poor kids (well, poor in this case, otherwise pretty lucky as things go) ... they MUST have suspicions and seeing the people who (likely) had their mum killed must make for hellish holiday gatherings.

I wonder what would happen if the suspicions get solidified (or even more so)?

a reply to: LABTECH767

I had forgotten about that time discrepancy w the ambulance ride. How reliable is that info?

THEY had to make it look like an accident, of course... so there were likely plans within plans making sure she didn't survive the crash.

I have no way to know, of course, but it always just felt ... er "murdery."

a reply to: EvilAxis
Two words...Richard Tomlinson

originally posted by: growler
the only people that wanted her dead were the tabloids that supported her.

Seems an odd theory when the tabloids (not the so-called quality press) gave the conspiracy angle most credence.

originally posted by: notsure1
Im surprised at how bad her handwriting is.

Not that it has much bearing on her handwriting, but despite her aristocratic background she had very little education. She joked that the only award she won at school was for best kept Guinea pig.

Thanks for the cached link Badw0lf - confirms it's a clone of the Mirror article without the 'what we're supposed to believe' part at the end.

originally posted by: Snarl

originally posted by: lordcomac
There are no accidents in politics.

And that slut knew exactly what she was doing. If the royals had her killed ... I'd have to give them a pass.

You feel it would be OK for the Royal family to have her murdered because she had extramarital sex? Do you feel the same about Charles who it seems did the same from the beginning of their marriage? Are you a member of Isis or is it just some of their values you share?

originally posted by: JohnnyCanuck
a reply to: EvilAxis
Two words...Richard Tomlinson

Interesting...

Two days before she was wacked I was driving through the Swiss Alps up through interlarken with the family.

I heard on the radio that Diana was pregnant and getting engaged to DF. Upon hearing this I turned to my wife and said no good will come of this because this is a threat to the standing of the UK Royal Family and Diana could convert to being a Muslim and what if her children later decided to follow. I had a distinct feeling at the time that Diana was in trouble.

2 days later we were stood in an early morning queue for Disney Paris after spending the night at a hotel in Checy La Chelle (excuse the spelling) near Paris.

We overheard from those standing next to us in the queue that Diana had been killed in Paris in a vehicle accident. I immediately said she had been wacked for sure!

And events following her death only confirmed this to me.

The people loved Diana more than the Royal family and for her funeral parade from London to Northampton the people showed that when the motorway all the way was lined with people out to pay there respects.

RIP Diana

I have no idea if this is true or not, I don't even remember where I read it as it was so long ago, but from what I recall from the article, there was speculation that the ambulance ride took as long as it did was because they performed an abortion on her.

I seem to recall it was someone digging into the matter, but like I said, a Ong time ago that I read it and don't even think I could find it now if I tried. Perhaps someone else recalls this as well?

a reply to: EvilAxis

Extremely well stated, Charles has done far more to discredit the moral stance of the royal family that any other in several generation's, he is simply not fit to be heir to the throne, his own grand uncle Edward had to abdicate and to step aside because of HIS affair with a married woman - then divorcee Wallis Simpson and while in France under German occupation they hosted dinner party's for the Nazi's whom were in charge of the occupied nation - it may have also served a purpose however as a back door for non official dialogue even though Edward was almost persona non grata at that time.

Charles on the other hand has had an affair with Camilla prior to her marriage, during her marriage and after her marriage AND has MARRIED her a Divorcee yet has not been asked to renounce his claim to the throne even once despite being an adulterer in the eye's of the Church whose head he is slated to become.
Camilla for her part actually has more royal blood though as indeed did Diana than the Windsors actually do despite being the anointed family at this time.

Diana's Royal blood was from the noble house of Stuart whose kingship ended in England (not Scotland) when they were deposed by Cromwell because of the Stuart ties to the Catholic faith, a long and convoluted story with hero's and villain's on both side's.

Camilla's royal blood is actually rather more dubious and not as royal or untainted as Diana's lineage was.

Camilla's ancestor was one Alice Frederica Edmonstone Keppel (hardly sound's English now does it) whom was the Mistress to the king, she was a rumored high class courtesan and prostitute whom the King Edward the seventh was deeply in love with, in fact he never really loved his wife the queen whom called for his mistress to be at his bedside when he lay dying and so given she did that the queen did love or at least care about her husband enough to forgive, BUT of course Edward the seventh was also less royal than the Stuart's?, which mean's that even if that had not been an illegitimate royal lineage (and perhaps most of us have that eh! and some of us actually have Legitimate royal lineage) Camilla is still not really royal blood at all but simply prior anointed royal blood to the house of Windsor (Hapsburg oh they are royal - black royalty as well as it was called from Italian lineage as well as house of Hanover from old Charlemagne but the model Claudia Schiffer has more royal blood of even that lineage than they do).

So I rest that only Diana actually had any right to the throne among that bunch (there are also other's with stronger claim including a guy in Australia) but that was why she was chosen, to be a cow for breeding keeping there blood line's exclusive and nothing more and to cement there ancestral claim for those that actually care about such to the British Throne which make's will's and Harry eminently more royal than the rest of there family (Except Diana's brother of course).


Note to Snarl, you are simply wrong to call Diana a Slut, She was a decent and kind woman whom risked her life walking through active mine field's and did her best to get them disarmed and banned highlighting the plight of millions in the third world to the public, walked in among dying contagious patient's in hospitals' and clinic's and comforting them the world over, not only aid's sufferers whom are NOT contagious, she did her best to help the poor here in Britain and abroad and Cameron and his cronies would not have gotten away with the crime's they committed had she still been around.

If she was a slut than heaven is filled with them and very few royal's of other ilk's.

Why because she was lonely and broken of heart, a passionate woman trapped in a depressing and loveless marriage to a weirdo whom liked haggard old MARRIED woman and talking to plant's because they actually listen to him or so he imagine's, you know Diana actually loved him, even tried to do all she could to get his attention back but he was simply not interested once the novelty wore off of his toy and he had his heir and a spare back up.

AND Camilla is far from the only one Charles got to know, Diana far from the only one to die to avoid a scandal as well.

Or was that just because you were angry because she was in love with that Dodi guy whom also lost his life, remember he was not a turban wearing bed sheet stealing camel jokey, he was extremely westernized so the title of Muslim was only loosely applicable to him and playboy would be more accurate and though I personally would have been angry with her for marrying that man as she was going to do so it was her life and it would not have made me like her any less, he was also by all account's a decent - even a good guy but just not appropriate for her and wrong for the future king's mother to have relation's with, that did not make her a slut though just wrong on that point but like I say she was legally a free woman to do as she liked and whom are we to judge on that point.



A final point to the thread, the SAS were I am absolutely certain involved and that would have included there Brass or some of them but not ALL SAS soldiers would have any knowledge of this and only a select group likely were involved, MI5 the same also with only a select group among them likely involved but it was big enough and enough string's were pulled that the French intelligence were also involved indicating that this was a high level operation ordered from a very high level indeed and in fact cold war style operation.

a reply to: EvilAxis

This is a bot odd for me. Last night in my state in aus, there was a doco on Dianas death and it was a con job too.

Did they know about this wonder? Perahps just a coincidence.

The process turned her from a sweet aristocratic young lady into a manipulative and tawdry embarresment to the Establishment. The out pouring of British grief showed the depth of feeling for her plight as much as anything.

I've no doubt the 'accident' was planned.

There will always be two camps: one 'accident', the other 'murder'.

The really smart thing was to leave it inconclusive in terms of evidence, and therefore forever an ember to be blown when a distraction, warning, or reminder would be helpful.

Perhaps, say, should a Prince say not one wants the throne...

originally posted by: Konduit
Dodi's father, the king of Monaco, claims to this day that Diana and his son was killed by MI5 on the orders of Prince Phillip, probably because she was pregnant and it would have been an embarrassment to the British Royal Family.

Say WhAAAAAT Bro?


You better not tell Prince Rainier and Prince Albert, the Royalty of Monaco, for several centuries as part of the Grimaldi family.........That they are not the "Kings".....an Egyptian is......

Diana Wasn't murdered, she was just unfortunate that the driver was drinking before driving, she wWasnt wearing her seat belt (even tho scared of dying in a car accident), the Paparazi on a motorbike was using flashes on their cameras, right in the eyes of a drunk driver, the driver was driving too fast and erratically and they were about to enter a tunnel with 10foot concrete pylons that you shouldn't drive into......but they drove into one!!!

So, Had the driver not been drinking, had Dodi not panicked and told the drive to speed up and avoid photos, had Diana
been wearing her seat belt, instead of ducking down to try to avoid photos........they would all still be alive today.

No Conspiracy Im afraid......Just bad Dumb luck and making a wrong assessment of the situation at the time.

originally posted by: EvilAxis

You feel it would be OK for the Royal family to have her murdered (and called unpleasent names) because she had extramarital sex? Do you feel the same about Charles who it seems did the same from the beginning of their marriage? Are you a member of Isis or is it just some of their values you share?

As always the sexist .... one law for the man and another for the woman.


I have to say at the time it happened I was inclined to feel it was probably

an accident, sh1t happens.


I hadn't intended to watch the programme, but it was on in the background and I

got drawn in and after watching it drew the conclusion that there is some truth

in it.


Another thing that has always puzzled me is the unseemingly haste in which the

embalming on Diana took place!! .... hmmnn


I would like to have been a fly on the wall in Charles and Camilla's lounge where

they must have been watching the TV.

originally posted by: Snarl

originally posted by: lordcomac
There are no accidents in politics.

Nope ... I agree.

And that slut knew exactly what she was doing. If the royals had her killed ... I'd have to give them a pass.

Wait... What?

Give them a pass for murder because it's cool with you.... Wow... OK.... Carry on

originally posted by: Konduit
Dodi's father, the king of Monaco

Mohammed Al Fayed is most certainly not the King of Monaco.

The driver was drunk,he was traveling over 100 mph,hit concrete barrier,and the result would be same,no matter what kind of car,but then again it is one of many storys,and yet to see or hear of any paybacks

a reply to: LABTECH767

I agree with Snarl. I disagree there was any SAS involved in her demise. That's a tragic assumption.

bally

originally posted by: Konduit
Dodi's father, the king of Monaco]

Eh? Dodi's father was a grocer made good, ended up a partner in a super posh department store and then took it over. He added the "Al-" prefix to the family name himself (apparently, or so it is told) as it suggests a noble heritage he did not have.

From memory, but more accurate than suggesting he is the "King" of Monaco.. No idea where you got that from dude/dudette


Eta: far more murky origins than grocery after a little read! Maybe arms deals, ME construction etc

a reply to: Snarl

I agree with your first sentence.

The royals, well there'd be a lot riding on having her murdered. I'm sure some nut case would have come forward with their knowledge of the plot but alas no.

It was an accident. Try blaming the driver or perhaps those pursuing the limo.

Maybe the death of my brother riding in a cab, after going to a movie (Who Killed Virginia Wolf) 1967 was a conspiracy. Killed by a drunk driver of another car who fled the accident.

Crikey people get over it and see past the makeup and doe eyes.

regards,

bally