It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Baltimore Police Commissioner Kevin Davis said Wednesday there was “no doubt” that illegal drugs were legitimately recovered in two criminal cases that were dropped by prosecutors amid questions surrounding officer body-camera footage.
Defense attorneys in both cases have alleged that the footage showed officers planting drugs.
In the first video, recorded in January and released by the public defender’s office last month, a police officer can be seen placing a bag of alleged drugs in a debris-strewn back yard, walking to the street, activating his body camera — which automatically saved footage of the 30 seconds prior to activation — and then walking back into the alley and recovering the bag.
The second video, released Tuesday, shows officers conducting a search of a vehicle and finding nothing in the front driver’s side area of the car. Then, about 30 minutes later, it shows an officer leaning down into the same area of the vehicle and back up with a bag of alleged drugs.
originally posted by: underwerks
a reply to: gladtobehere
Until society cares more about helping people than it does punishing them, there won't be any drastic changes.
Hopefully that point isn't too far in the future.
The officer, Richard Pinheiro, has been suspended with pay, while two other cops in the video have been placed on administrative duty as the investigation pends. More than thirty other cases the three officers were to serve as witnesses for are now being dismissed.
originally posted by: RomeByFire
It is moments like these that bring people to saying "# the police."
Has nothing to do with wanting to kill cops and/or breaking the law and getting away with it...
... has everything to do with cops breaking the law and not only getting away with it, but being defended to the T even after blatantly obvious videos are present that show criminal behavior by those meant to "protect and serve."
I'm curious... who do they protect us from? Who do they serve?
Because they certainly don't protect us from criminals with no regard to the law, and they certainly don't serve the public.
originally posted by: Kandinsky
a reply to: gladtobehere
I think these allegations are less about drug laws and more about the three officers who appear to have planted the gear. Yes, there's a wider debate on the war on drugs, but this seems to be a case of officers going off the reservation and possibly framing someone for supplying. Would they be honest cops if there was no war on drugs? That's the issue here imo.
When I watched these guys apparently planting the bag of drugs, I wondered where they got it from? Why did they have it? According to this article:
The officer, Richard Pinheiro, has been suspended with pay, while two other cops in the video have been placed on administrative duty as the investigation pends. More than thirty other cases the three officers were to serve as witnesses for are now being dismissed.
It's a dirty world and heroin dealers are amongst the lowest of the low. It can ruin communities and has almost a 100% success rate of breaking up families and causing deprivation for children. Sometimes police have planted evidence to bust people who would otherwise be profiting off ruined lives. It's not right, but imo it's understandable.
The thing is, the laws have to be upheld and LEOs should abide by them.
originally posted by: kelbtalfenek
a reply to: gladtobehere
Wasn't Serpico shot up because he actually went against the common practice? Oh yeah, he tried to expose the big blue lie.
The police chief is backing his guys because he's probably in on it.