It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: St0rD
a reply to: namelesss
However, when it comes to objective and universal truths, a paradox can't be sustained in all of them.
Some truths are ultimate no matter the perspective.
In this instance, the result is simple -
either God exists or he doesn't. You can't have both.
This is why the debate in this regards is a very profound one and may cause even more division in the years to come... unfortunately.
originally posted by: LittleByLittle
a reply to: namelesss
Sometimes the thing you are measuring is an elephant and all perspective telling it is not a elephant is miss guided (untrue) since the whole picture is not clear.
Your idea at it's most extreme leads to total unknowing instead of questioning the data and refining the answers.
Just because you are a part in a system of parts it does not automatically tell you the whole of the parts.
A cell in a body can have the wrong information/perception/belief about the shape of the whole body it belongs to is.
That the cell is unaware of how the whole should be represented truthfully objectively do not change that the whole includes the information from the cell within itself.
There is only one single representation of what was/is/will be that is objectively true.
With awareness we can sort the things we know and the things that seems probable and increase the size of things we know and things that seem probable.
Mathematics is a good example of a field we know to be objectively true. Opinion do not matter in Mathematics. 2+1=3 and no other value.