Some Pictures I Took of Weird Things I Saw in the Space Above Me

originally posted by: wmd_2008
a reply to: M4ngo

NoCoruptionAllowed was NOT talking about your pictures it was others on the net of out of focus dust particles he thinks are some kind of spirit.

WTF? I know. That is why I said my response wasn't to him/her.

You still think it is/was for some reason.

originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed

originally posted by: wmd_2008
a reply to: M4ngo

NoCoruptionAllowed was NOT talking about your pictures it was others on the net of out of focus dust particles he thinks are some kind of spirit.

Actually some of the images in the OP might be spirits and not dust. There is really no way to know for sure,. The only way to find out is to first die and then go to someone's back yard as a spirit, and hope they take your picture, then you will know it was a spirit.

Thanks for the replies.

BTW I never meant any responses I posted on here towards you, I just accidentally left your username in the quote of the person's I was responding to.

Can you elaborate on orbs? Not sure about those. Any proof of existence?

a reply to: M4ngo

I'm not sure about any proof existing, but I have seen orbs on video, usually from footage from an infrared camera, and on ghost adventures footage. They always show the difference between dust particles and the real orbs using examples of dust as well as when they have some genuine orbs appearing on video. The orbs self illuminate when they are moving around, so that's why I think some of your images could be orbs, since you mentioned small lights being visible.

files.abovetopsecret.com...

in this picture, in the upper left corner i see a hand with quite long fingers.
no objects of any kind - metal or not.

Some recent cloud pictures

originally posted by: M4ngo

originally posted by: wmd_2008
a reply to: M4ngo

I suggest you READ NoCorruptioAllowed's post before making any other comments.

Why? I wasn't responding to that poster. I was responding to InhaleExhale who suggested that it could just be dust.

Maybe I am missing something?

I made no such suggestions.

Yes you are missing something,

I was replying to a poster claiming its no way it could be dust.

I didn't say it was just explained that saying it cannot be dust is ignorance when it can be replicated using dust and coming out exactly like it is the images.

Not saying it is but just countering the claim that it cannot be.

a reply to: M4ngo

Some recent cloud pictures

can you maybe add why you think they are weird?


I see arrows but fail to see any weirdness other than its weird that you think cloud formations with the infinite shapes they can make are weird due to their shape.

originally posted by: InhaleExhale

originally posted by: M4ngo

originally posted by: wmd_2008
a reply to: M4ngo

I suggest you READ NoCorruptioAllowed's post before making any other comments.

Why? I wasn't responding to that poster. I was responding to InhaleExhale who suggested that it could just be dust.

Maybe I am missing something?

I made no such suggestions.

Yes you are missing something,

I was replying to a poster claiming its no way it could be dust.

I didn't say it was just explained that saying it cannot be dust is ignorance when it can be replicated using dust and coming out exactly like it is the images.

Not saying it is but just countering the claim that it cannot be.

I understand what you mean, but in the case of taking a photo of a single star in the night sky, a speck of dust can’t mimic a star’s characteristics while also the overcoming and replacing the entire light of the star.

originally posted by: TruthxIsxInxThexMist
a reply to: M4ngo
I just wasted 5 mins of life viewing this thread.

When you don't win that Nobel Prize, you'll have this as your excuse.

originally posted by: InhaleExhale
a reply to: M4ngo

Some recent cloud pictures

can you maybe add why you think they are weird?


I see arrows but fail to see any weirdness other than its weird that you think cloud formations with the infinite shapes they can make are weird due to their shape.

The arrows were put there to emphasize a particular area of interest. I see what believe to be inter-dimensional UFOs, and that perception was coupled with sensing a foreign energy present while the particular clouds were around. That’s no problem if you don’t see anything, not here to try and convince you to.

a reply to: M4ngo

I am ignorant in this topic

Then from one ignorant person to another, I thought these pictures were great!

I didn't find the 'metal object' however, and the photo tends to look like a break in the clouds.

But keep them coming, you're good.

originally posted by: myselfaswell
a reply to: M4ngo

Well, the nighttime images look to me as though they are stars etc with a little too much zoomy zoom.

The cloud images can be dealt with via a little cheerleader ditty;

Give me a P, give me a A, give me a R, give me a E, give me a I, give me a D, give me a O, give me a L, give me a I, give me a A, What Does It Spell

Pareidolia

Calling all pattern finds by humans, a case of pareidolia, is as stupid as if someone drove by in a Camaro and you say it's a Ford Taurus, because a Ford Taurus is a car, just like the Camaro.

Dismissive claims without constructive input, are unnecessary and is just a manifestation of you seeking attention.*

Don't take this reply the wrong way, I'm not trying to take any particular stance here. I agree with your skepticism and OPINION of Pareidolia being a reasonable explanation. (My first bet is on straight up hoax. I recognize Photoshop opacity changes with overlay filtering and unique brushes. Totally used the darken brush all over that image.)

* I just don't support being a dick on the internet.

Also, I'd like to further backup my hoax claim with this reasonable logic:
OP posted the same image again, "enhanced".

OP would need experience with graphic editing tools to perform those "enhancements" himself.

Thus, OP has the necessary software and experience, to have hoaxed all of the images. This would have taken Sherlock Holmes about 10 seconds too, probably. Baby mode hoaxing. I'll give it a 2/10 on the BS meter.

After even further investigation, I recommend that this post should be closed.

This is a hoax with 100% certainty.

M4ngo, would you like to apologize for trying to hoax this board? Or are you going to play a charade?

I can prove the first image set is a hoax in about 3 seconds. To allow you to save some dignity, I'm not posting that detail here. I am giving you a chance to set the record straight on your own. Maybe a quick apology? I don't really care personally, but this board isn't for pretend time and imagination, nor childish pranks.

I don't really know if trying to directly hoax this board is against the rules or not. If any mod or the admin want to see the evidence that this is a hoax, I can provide it.

a reply to: M4ngo

Very very interesting pictures you got there, to me that looks like an object that is cloaked.

I’m not trying to hoax, wtf are you on about? All photos have been taken with an iPhone and I made it clear in OP that I edited some of the images’ (ie contrast and lighting). I do not have Photoshop and no tools have been used to brush.

originally posted by: Archivalist
After even further investigation, I recommend that this post should be closed.

This is a hoax with 100% certainty.

M4ngo, would you like to apologize for trying to hoax this board? Or are you going to play a charade?

I can prove the first image set is a hoax in about 3 seconds. To allow you to save some dignity, I'm not posting that detail here. I am giving you a chance to set the record straight on your own. Maybe a quick apology? I don't really care personally, but this board isn't for pretend time and imagination, nor childish pranks.

I don't really know if trying to directly hoax this board is against the rules or not. If any mod or the admin want to see the evidence that this is a hoax, I can provide it.

You can go on and say whatever you like. I have nothing to hide. All images have been taken with an iPhone, some are original and some are enhanced with the iPhone’s editing like contrast and lighting. There is no manipulation with brushes and #. I am not trying to convince anyone of anything, so please stop being a dick.

a reply to: M4ngo

The arrows were put there to emphasize a particular area of interest.

yes that was what I was asking about.

I see what believe to be inter-dimensional UFOs, and that perception was coupled with sensing a foreign energy present while the particular clouds were around.

again this is what I am asking about.

I assumed you had a belief that its a UFO but am curious as to how you arrive to such a belief or conclusion.

what does sensing a foreign energy mean?

That’s no problem if you don’t see anything, not here to try and convince you to.

I see clouds and am interested in how you have arrived that its 1. something other than a cloud

and then 2. that its inter dimensional.

Your addition that you felt some foreign energy only begs more questions because its very vague.

a foreign energy is something you are feeling that you have never felt before?

Or an external energy?

or a mix of both?

a reply to: M4ngo

Then you need to setup an appointment with the Genius Bar at your local Apple store.

You need to ask them why your iPhone 5s is copy pasting it's EXIF data for images. Unless you are somehow dilating time?

www.apple.com...

Your exif data for the first two images has the file creation and modify dates listed as the exact same time, down to the millisecond.

If not on purpose, your iPhone 5s has a very weird software glitch. My apologies if that is the case.

If you somehow have time travel, I'd love to hear about how you can save an "enhanced copy" of an image at the same millisecond as creating the original.

-Former Senior Advisor iOS, iPhone, iPad, iPod, iCloud

a reply to: Archivalist

Your exif data for the first two images has the file creation and modify dates listed as the exact same time, down to the millisecond. If not on purpose, your iPhone 5s has a very weird software glitch. My apologies if that is the case.

did you read what they replied to you with?



They said

"All images have been taken with an iPhone, some are original and some are enhanced with the iPhone’s editing like contrast and lighting."


does that not suffice?

Sorry I have no clue about I phones but could that be why the EXIF data displays what it does?

a reply to: InhaleExhale

From metadata on his first image:
Create Date 2017:07:22 04:44:04
Modify Date 2017:07:22 04:44:04

From metadata on his second image (The "enhanced" version.):
Create Date 2017:07:22 04:44:04
Modify Date 2017:07:22 04:44:04

Nothing about that, seems odd to you?

Software glitch or coincidence, I'm remaining full skeptic. I was promoted out of that role before the 5s launched, so maybe the iPhone 4s was the last iPhone to properly handle updating EXIF information with proper file modify timestamps.

Dang, first no headphone jack, now they won't even change a timestamp for an image edit/enhancement.