It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Symmetries are the holy grail for physicists. Symmetry means that one can transform an object in a certain way that leaves it invariant. For example, a round ball can be rotated by an arbitrary angle, but always looks the same. Physicists say it is symmetric under rotations. Once the symmetry of a physical system is identified it’s often possible to predict its dynamics.
Sometimes however the laws of quantum mechanics destroy a symmetry that would happily exist in a world without quantum mechanics, i.e classical systems. Even to physicists this looks so strange that they named this phenomenon an “anomaly”.
Now however, a new type of materials, the so-called Weyl semimetals, similar to 3D graphene, allow us to put the symmetry destructing quantum anomaly to work in everyday phenomena, such as the creation of electric current.
In these exotic materials electrons effectively behave in the very same way as the elementary particles studied in high energy accelerators. These particles have the strange property that they cannot be at rest — they have to move with a constant speed at all times. They also have another property called spin. It is like a tiny magnet attached to the particles and they come in two species. The spin can either point in the direction of motion or in the opposite direction.
[Chirality] would come with separate symmetries attached to them and their numbers would be separately conserved. However, a quantum anomaly can destroy their peaceful coexistence and changes a left-handed particle into a right-handed one or vice-versa.
Appearing in a paper published today in Nature, an international team of physicists, material scientists and string theoreticians, have observed such a material, an effect of a most exotic quantum anomaly that hitherto was thought to be triggered only by the curvature of space-time as described by Einstein’s theory of relativity [i.e., black holes]. But to the surprise of the team, they discovered it also exists on Earth in the properties of solid state physics, which much of the computing industry is based on, spanning from tiny transistors to cloud data centers.
New calculations, using in part the methods of string theory, showed that this gravitational anomaly is also responsible for producing a current if the material is heated up at the same time a magnetic field is applied.
The equations that describe the universe at the smallest and largest scales — like how the tiniest elementary particles dance — predicted a slight incongruity, a tiny unbalancing in the numbers of certain particles under certain circumstances. But physicists have yet to observe this phenomenon — with the name of mixed axial-gravitational anomaly — and confirm the prediction. The imbalance is negligible except when the warping of space-time is extreme, like next to a black hole.
The gravitational anomaly popped out from equations that describe how particles called pions moving at close to the speed of light could decay into gravitons, the fundamental particles that carry the force of gravity. Usually, the laws of physics prohibit pions from falling apart in this way. But under Einstein’s theory of general relativity, the curving of space-time can tip the balance to allow this decay to occur. A pion consists of two smaller pieces: a quark and an antiquark.
originally posted by: TinfoilTP
I read it as doing the opposite, electric current could convert to gravity.
They used Gravity to produce electricity the inverse is use electicity to create excess gravity.
originally posted by: Spacespider
So if I rotate magnetic balls, free energy?
originally posted by: TEOTWAWKIAIFF
What?!!! They have created electricity from gravity?! Using a Weyl semimetal (crystal) they took a quantum anomaly to "convert" gravity to an electric current?"
Am I reading this correct, ATS?
originally posted by: TinfoilTP
I read it as doing the opposite, electric current could convert to gravity.
They used Gravity to produce electricity the inverse is use electicity to create excess gravity.
originally posted by: strongfp
originally posted by: TinfoilTP
I read it as doing the opposite, electric current could convert to gravity.
They used Gravity to produce electricity the inverse is use electicity to create excess gravity.
Gravity still needs an initial 'push' from a source of energy. The amount of energy you put in won't be same next time around.
This thread is pseudo science. Basic understanding of physics can prove this wrong.
A sphere is simply the most efficient object in the universe, it can expand and contract to harness energy. hence why atoms and electrons are depicted and seen as spheres, planets are spheres, etc, etc... bottom line is tho the amount of energy you put into a physical object of a law of physics means you won't get the same amount of energy back again. Those law applies to gravity as well.
A good example of this is lights used in third world nations where you hook a weight to an anchor chain, whined it up and let gravity 'create' the electricity for a LED light bulb. but gravity had nothing to do with the creation of the electricity, some other outside force had to pull that weight AWAY from gravity, a human, using energy itself.