Another muslim attack in Germany 7 30 2017

A terrorist opened fire at a packed nightclub in southern Germany early on Sunday, killing one and wounding four before being shot by police. The 34-year-old man, identified as an Iraqi national, “was critically injured in the shootout with police officers as he left the disco, and later died from his wounds in the hospital. One of witnesses said that the attacker was shooting randomly at clubbers around him.
In the meantime Mein Fuhrer Merkle openly accepts more muslims with open arms. I just wonder when she will begin her own “fast and fuhreres” program and begin arming the immigrants.
I had to add the date due to soooo many of these terror attacks. And I needed to point out that this happened today.
www.telegraph.co.uk...
www.theguardian.com...

a reply to: Violater1

This is all about cause and effect. Europe's leadership brought this on their own citizens, with the support of some of those same citizens.

a reply to: Violater1

Why is this your idea of news? Just asking?

Tally for U.S. US 0/2017 - 3 killed, 8 wounded by firearms - slow Sunday.

Google "how many killed by guns today" to get the fast breaking stats you need!

Germany - 2 dead, 4 wounded, in a nation with about 50 in deaths a year.

YES #1, today, and everyday, with over 31,000 gun related deaths each year!

Discuss amongst yourselves.

Drops mix leaves thread.

Reason was a dispute between the attacker and his father in law, the owner of the club.
That´s why he shot into the club, not because he was muslim, not because it was a muslim terror attack(TM).

Streit war Grund für tödliche Schüsse in Disco

a reply to: TacSite18

My edit. It appears this person had an argument with someone in the club. So not a terrorist attack.

a reply to: Violater1

Your own article posted by the Guardian states the police have ruled-out terrorism....

So why are you stating this is terrorist related?

mg

originally posted by: TacSite18
a reply to: Violater1

Why is this your idea of news? Just asking?

Tally for U.S. US 0/2017 - 3 killed, 8 wounded by firearms - slow Sunday.

Google "how many killed by guns today" to get the fast breaking stats you need!

Germany - 2 dead, 4 wounded, in a nation with about 50 in deaths a year.

YES #1, today, and everyday, with over 31,000 gun related deaths each year!

Discuss amongst(sic) yourselves.

Drops mix leaves thread.

You do realize that already in July 2017, that half of those German deaths have been reached this year?

July 10 www.washingtonpost.com... tory.html

July 18 www.theguardian.com...

July 22 www.cnn.com...

July 24 www.nytimes.com...

July 30 2017-- TODAY!


IS has said it wants to target Germany and claimed the Wuerzburg attacker acted for the group
www.bbc.com...

originally posted by: DerBeobachter
Reason was a dispute between the attacker and his father in law, the owner of the club.
That´s why he shot into the club, not because he was muslim, not because it was a muslim terror attack(TM).

Streit war Grund für tödliche Schüsse in Disco

Oh yes, the liberal socialist apologists speak up for this obvious peaceful religion.
Merkle has denied that Germany has a muslim problem, and the German media (like the MSM in The USA) tow the line.
Of coarse it wasn't a terrorist action "sarcasism off"
If he wanted to shoot his dad he would have done it at home, or their mosque! But no, he did it at the Disco.

originally posted by: missed_gear
a reply to: Violater1

Your own article posted by the Guardian states the police have ruled-out terrorism....

So why are you stating this is terrorist related?

mg

They have to rule it out to continue being politically correct and silence its people. Police work for government, not the people. And Merkel has lied to her people, therefore government (police) lie to the media...media tells this lie as a truth just like CNN.

The killing act was real, but the news story is not.

FAKE NEWS

I wouldn't be surprised if the attacker's father who owns the disco is funneling money back to IS to continue its terrorist activities. Just a thought.

originally posted by: DerBeobachter
Reason was a dispute between the attacker and his father in law, the owner of the club.
That´s why he shot into the club, not because he was muslim, not because it was a muslim terror attack(TM).

So why did he have a gun in his possession and how did he obtain it?

a reply to: DerBeobachter

so are you saying its normal when you have a dispute with a specific person that instead of dealing with that specific person you lash out at random people? are you saying thats normal? it sounds like youre saying that any number of "normal" or average people would have reacted the same way under those circumstances and you could simply not be farther from the truth.


this absolutely IS ISLAM related because Islam is an ideological brain virus that makes people when they choose to act violently think its perfectly okay to take out random innocent strangers. I dont know of any other religious ideology that teaches and or encourages that kind of message and behavior does anyone else?

originally posted by: 3daysgone
a reply to: Violater1

This is all about cause and effect. Europe's leadership brought this on their own citizens, with the support of some of those same citizens.

You left out, with the help of Barrak Hussein Obama.

originally posted by: Skywatcher2011

originally posted by: DerBeobachter
Reason was a dispute between the attacker and his father in law, the owner of the club.
That´s why he shot into the club, not because he was muslim, not because it was a muslim terror attack(TM).

So why did he have a gun in his possession and how did he obtain it?

VERY good question. I know you can get guns in germany, but from what i understand it is mostly farmers/ rural dwelling folks that get permission. That and sportsmen. This guy doesnt strike me as a farmer or sports shooter.

I could be wrong, and this gun is legally his... but I'd say the odds are against that.

originally posted by: Violater1

originally posted by: DerBeobachter
Reason was a dispute between the attacker and his father in law, the owner of the club.
That´s why he shot into the club, not because he was muslim, not because it was a muslim terror attack(TM).

Streit war Grund für tödliche Schüsse in Disco

Oh yes, the liberal socialist apologists speak up for this obvious peaceful religion.
Merkle has denied that Germany has a muslim problem, and the German media (like the MSM in The USA) tow the line.
Of coarse it wasn't a terrorist action "sarcasism off"
If he wanted to shoot his dad he would have done it at home, or their mosque! But no, he did it at the Disco.

Oh yes, the anti-democratic national-socialist apologists speak up for their own rightwinger bias.
Would it be terror for you, if the attacker would have been german and shot a not bio-german?

Fact is, as we know now, the guy had a dispute with some people that worked at the club, went home, took a M-16, went back and shot from outside at the bouncer that stood at the door, and killed him. And that he hadn´t a dispute with his father in law, which wasn´t his father in law, but brother in law, as we know now.

But why trying to get the real facts, if the muslim narrative fits the antidemocratic rightwingers bias?
Too much work, or wouldn´t that fit the bias anymore?

I worked more than three years in such a club, and one sunday morning, when i wanted to get my money from the office, there was a hole in the window and the wall. I asked my boss and he told me that somebody shot into that bureau before half an hour, trying to shoot him.
If you work for a while in such clubs, you don´t wonder about such incidents anymore. You wouldn´t believe what i saw there, at that time i worked there.
It´s a criminal business, the public club thing is just for washing money. Money is made with business behind the curtains, drugs, prostitutes and stuff.

But i guess the facts and all that, would never change the mind of a anti-democratic rightwinger.
Just everything else than what fits the rightwingers opinions are Fake News...

And then you accuse others of doing what you do?

Btw, i do not defend the muslim cult, i laugh about people that rather pray than start to change something on their own, like changing their life to a better. I laugh about people that pray into thin air, to their idols, and really hope that a wonder would happen. It doesn´t matter which cult it is, christian, muslim or whatever, i can´t take such people serious.

But we should stay with the facts and not turn the reality into something that fits the own opinion.
And if we do that in this case here, there is nothing more left that could be used by rightwingers, for their rightwinger PRopaganda.

Except the fact that the attacker was not bio-german, but an iraqi with a M-16, produced by the former united States. So i bet the guy was here because gods own country attacked and destroyed Iraq, basing on a lie. I could give you a better conspiracy theory than that boring rightwinger stuff(it´s everytime the same boring stuff), one that would make more sense, even if it is pure fantasy(maybe)...

originally posted by: tribal
a reply to: DerBeobachter

so are you saying its normal when you have a dispute with a specific person that instead of dealing with that specific person you lash out at random people?

Where did i say that???

I just want the people to stay with the facts, even if it doens´t then fit the own bias anymore.
That´s why i told you what happened, i didn´t say it´s normal to act like this lunatic acted.

originally posted by: seaswine

originally posted by: Skywatcher2011

originally posted by: DerBeobachter
Reason was a dispute between the attacker and his father in law, the owner of the club.
That´s why he shot into the club, not because he was muslim, not because it was a muslim terror attack(TM).

So why did he have a gun in his possession and how did he obtain it?

VERY good question. I know you can get guns in germany, but from what i understand it is mostly farmers/ rural dwelling folks that get permission. That and sportsmen. This guy doesnt strike me as a farmer or sports shooter.

I could be wrong, and this gun is legally his... but I'd say the odds are against that.

This was recently released, " Andreas Stenge from the Baden-Württemberg criminal investigation office said at a press conference. Mr Stenge said the M16 machine gun was an "absolute war weapon" and said the gunman appeared to know how to handle it."
www.bbc.com...
"sarcasm on" Gee no professionally trained terrorist here. Everyone in Germany owns an M-16. "sarcasm off"

a reply to: TacSite18
What does this have to do with terrorists? Break down those statistics into demographics to see where the problem with guns are, hummmm??

Hoax bin this crap. Op is a well know fake news pusher.

originally posted by: ErrorErrorError
Hoax bin this crap. Op is a well know fake news pusher.

Examples of fake news please that I made up.
I always provide sources, and I'm sorry for you if it triggered an error response.