It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
That could be the case. Soros and some of the other usual suspects obviously played dirty and spent a fortune doing so.
originally posted by: butcherguy
originally posted by: Illumimasontruth
a reply to: butcherguy
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
Yes.
After Hillary lost, there would be no reason to pay those women for their stories any more.
I think most people know that Trump has sexual deviancies, the photos of him and his daughter and the comments he has made about her always make me feel very uncomfortable. This to me looks like it could be just another one of the many claims of sexual deviance of Trump. There is loads of such claims, women have came out and accused him of sexual assault, his wife was granted a divorce on the grounds of his "cruel and inhumane treatment" of her, she is on record under oath saying that he beat her then raped her, and lets not forget the "grab them by the pussy" tape.
Despite all of this however, is supporters, even his female supporters remain loyal. At this point Trump has almost created a cult of followers with his as the figurehead.
originally posted by: knowledgehunter0986
a reply to: underwerks
Well to be fair, there's a difference between being the ring leaders of an occult that eats little boys in esoteric rituals, to being involved in a multi billion dollar industry where everything that happens is common knowledge and common practice.
originally posted by: knowledgehunter0986
a reply to: underwerks
The point I'm making is you are comparing apples to oranges. Sure, they both may involve human trafficking to some degree, but it's 2 completely different games.
originally posted by: knowledgehunter0986
a reply to: underwerks
That's exactly my point. One is common knowledge and common practice. You want us to boycott the fashion industry for the sake of being fair to the Clinton's?
Lol..
originally posted by: knowledgehunter0986
a reply to: underwerks
What? Did I lose you somewhere?
The fashion industry is common knowledge and common practice.. hence the absurdity and false equivalence of your comparison..
originally posted by: knowledgehunter0986
a reply to: underwerks
Like I said, apples to oranges.
Unless you have eyes like this and can't tell the fruits in the basket..
originally posted by: knowledgehunter0986
a reply to: underwerks
Other than the article being an over sensationalized hit piece based on emotions and projections, meant to pull on the heart strings of folks like you and OP, brought to us by the almighty non partisan and bias-free DailyKos?
Nope.
But interesting you decided to cut me off mid conversation to deflect back to the topic..
Good day underp___s,
originally posted by: tribal
a reply to: Diabolical1972
i see so far nobody seems to care about Obamas connection with an alleged sexual predator of young girls.