Muslim gang rampaged Liverpool attacking strangers because they were white “non-Muslims”

originally posted by: Matt11
Poor guys getting punched and humiliated in front of his girlfriend. It's ignorant assholes like this that has tarnished the good name of Islam, no wonder why so many people dislike muslims.
This is why I have a concealed weapon on me when out on the town, i would dare some Muslim bullies to confront me about my faith.

Islam has never had a good name. It has always been despised and the subject of mistrust. Those Islamic Middle Eastern did not become what they are until Islam arrived in them and took over. Islam always ends up dominating every country it is allowed into. You may not be religion focused but you can bet your conquerers will be. Civilisation and Islam cannot occupy the same space, one will inevitably overwhelm the other.

For all those complaining that 3 does not a "gang" make, and other issues related to the title, let us dissect it shall we and determine of it is accurate based upon our collective definitions. Using the common Merriam-Webster Dictionary definitions, we have:

Muslim gang rampaged Liverpool attacking strangers because they were white “non-Muslims”
These suspects were self-proclaimed Muslims, so this is an accepted fact. No need to debate this word.

Muslim gang rampaged Liverpool attacking strangers because they were white “non-Muslims”

Definition of gang
1 a (1) : a set of articles : outfit a gang of oars (2) : a combination of similar implements or devices arranged for convenience to act together a gang of sawsb : group: such as (1) : a group of persons working together (2) : a group of persons working to unlawful or antisocial ends; especially : a band of antisocial adolescents
2 : a group of persons having informal and usually close social relations watching TV with the gang

So, in this story it mentions 3 youths, working together to identify people to single out for assault and beatings. That fits the definition of "gang" in the sense that it is a group of persons working to unlawful or antisocial ends; especially : a band of antisocial adolescents

Muslim gang rampaged Liverpool attacking strangers because they were white “non-Muslims”

Definition of rampage
1 : a course of violent, riotous, or reckless action or behavior

Well, the actions of this gang did consist of a course of violent, riotous, or reckless action or behavior since it involved multiple victims of their ire. Therefore, it can be described as a "rampage".

Muslim gang rampaged Liverpool attacking strangers because they were white “non-Muslims”
This did happen in Liverpool England. so that is also a non-debateable fact.

This leaves the remaining end of the title,
Muslim gang rampaged Liverpool attacking strangers because they were white “non-Muslims”
Since there were eyewitnesses, with recorded video of them making these accusations, and even allowing someone to pass that admitted to being a Muslim, this too seems to be a case in fact.

In summary, the article and thread title, based upon accepted dictionary definitions, is accurate. Anyone claiming it is sensationalized either does not now the definitions of these words or is attempting to justify their actions by use of deflection, hyperbole, or outright lies.

Which is it folks?

originally posted by: GusMcDangerthing

originally posted by: nonspecific

originally posted by: Denoli

originally posted by: InsaneIthorian
Anyone would think people dont get punched in the face or beaten up in the USA....

That doesn't make it right !
That attitude is why this # is happening!

No it is happening as both sides are bieng bombarded with propaghanda and lies by the MSM and social media and both think the other is the enemy. Does divide and concuer mean anything to you as if you take it that perspective it all seems too familiar.

Only one side is kissing the ass of a terrorist cult and political ideology that wants to take over everywhere it goes like a parasite on a host.

And the other are a load of crazy muslims!

Baddum tish....

originally posted by: Hecate666
I think the reason people point out that these criminals were muslim and why it matters is the injustice of how these things are handled.

Most rational people notice that compared to Brits, [especially in the UK, where we hear and see and experience it for ourselves] muslims are treated with kid gloves.

There was a case not long ago where a group of drunk muslim girls racially abused a white girl, called her racial names and beat her up. They got off scott free because the judge said that they were not 'used to alcohol' and therefore could not be held responsible.

40 odd muslim men raped and groomed girls in britain for many years and were not arrested due to the police being politically correct and not daring to arrest those men.

Now another bunch of muslim guys get pissed and beat up white people, calling them names because they are infidels. Yet the sentence will be lenient again.

On the other hand, when EDL [English Defense League - right wing] meet in a pub, the police shows up and arrests some of them without anything even happening or being planned to happen.

Another Brit was arrested for [now hold on tight for this one] "revving his car in a racist manner at a muslim woman crossing the road".

THIS is what people are annoyed about. Muslims everywhere get special treatment, extra attention, whilst every little thing we do is immediately racist.

I and many others are fed up with this. Especially when I openly admit not liking islam and it's obvious spread through our culture. No religion should spread and take over a secular country. Nor should any religious folk get special treatment.


So stop whining about bigotism and hatred and all this rubbish and concentrate on the FACT that muslims are having v.i.p treatment in Britain [and in many other places], can do whatever they want and nobody dares say anything because...muslims.

If this unequal treatment continues, there will be backlashes. Not because of bigotism but because of injustice.

Let's face it, its not just muslim scum who gets away with raping and abusing people, especially children. The system is set up for rapists and pedophiles to thrive. These judges who give the perpetrators lenient sentences, and even acquitting them, are clearly involved.

I never really used to believe in the "rape culture" that feminists bang on about, but there really is one.

a reply to: seasonal

Doesn't sound like a gang to me! More like three idiots who deserve whatever is coming to them.

originally posted by: Stevenjames15
a reply to: seasonal

Doesn't sound like a gang to me! More like three idiots who deserve whatever is coming to them.

I suggest you read my post in this thread...

Was it a gang?

... before making ignorant statements such as that, apologist.

SMH

Please read!!!

Hate speech is not welcome here:
The END of Hate Speech, subtle or otherwise, on ATS
**ALL MEMBERS** The recent surge in Hatred, Racism, and Sheer Stupidity STOPS NOW

You are responsible for your own posts.....those who ignore that responsibility will face mod actions.


and, as always:

Do NOT reply to this post!!

originally posted by: nonspecific

originally posted by: Denoli

originally posted by: InsaneIthorian
Anyone would think people dont get punched in the face or beaten up in the USA....

That doesn't make it right !
That attitude is why this # is happening!

No it is happening as both sides are bieng bombarded with propaghanda and lies by the MSM and social media and both think the other is the enemy. Does divide and concuer mean anything to you as if you take it that perspective it all seems too familiar.

a reply to: seasonal

If I was in a position to determine what happens with such 'Muslims' I would round those that attack others due to faith reasons and literally deport them to a Muslim country of the countries choosing. In a way of saying, you wish to preach your faith in an aggressive way, well ok. Here, go back to your country because faith based attacks are not allowed here.

Because I cannot remember the last attack in modern day Europe coming from any of the following;

Judaism.
Hinduism.
Sikhism.
Buddhism.

In the UK. Non have carried out such attacks. They have 'all' blended into our customs.

originally posted by: BlackProject
a reply to: seasonal

If I was in a position to determine what happens with such 'Muslims' I would round those that attack others due to faith reasons and literally deport them to a Muslim country of the countries choosing. In a way of saying, you wish to preach your faith in an aggressive way, well ok. Here, go back to your country because faith based attacks are not allowed here.

Because I cannot remember the last attack in modern day Europe coming from any of the following;

Judaism.
Hinduism.
Sikhism.
Buddhism.

In the UK. Non have carried out such attacks. They have 'all' blended into our customs.

Where would you deport Muslims born in the UK to?
What happens to Christians who commit a crime?

originally posted by: SudoNim

originally posted by: BlackProject
a reply to: seasonal

If I was in a position to determine what happens with such 'Muslims' I would round those that attack others due to faith reasons and literally deport them to a Muslim country of the countries choosing. In a way of saying, you wish to preach your faith in an aggressive way, well ok. Here, go back to your country because faith based attacks are not allowed here.

Because I cannot remember the last attack in modern day Europe coming from any of the following;

Judaism.
Hinduism.
Sikhism.
Buddhism.

In the UK. Non have carried out such attacks. They have 'all' blended into our customs.

Where would you deport Muslims born in the UK to?
What happens to Christians who commit a crime?

I often hear this sentiment, that if a Muslim is born in the UK then therefore those people have the right to reside here even-though they promote a foreign faith or any faith that results in aggression and violence towards another human being. They may have a British birth certificate but if they wish to promote something that is country based, well they can go back to the origin countries for said faith. As if they think their faith is the right one, then the country of origin must be the place they should be living within. After all, it was their gods will.

Being the UK and being originally Christian in nature, it would not be an option to deport them elsewhere. I have yet to hear a Christian attacking another in this country due to faith based reasons, only that someone did something bad and later someone mentioning that he was Christian. Yet I will iterate again, there is none or very little in faith based attacks from Christians in this country against other faiths. So your question, is two very separate matters altogether.

It is not wrong for origins of a faith, in its original country to defend itself. However it is wrong for a foreign faith, to interject itself into another and think that they should accept.

Do you see any of the following;

Judaism.
Islam.
Hinduism.
Sikhism.
Buddhism.

Attacking Muslim born countries? or building their religious buildings in their countries?

a reply to: BlackProject

I noticed you missed off other religions from your list. Wouldn't work if you included Christianity/Catholicism, would it?

originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: BlackProject

I noticed you missed off other religions from your list. Wouldn't work if you included Christianity/Catholicism, would it?

I did not miss anything purposely off. I merely am showing that Christians peacefully blend in already with those other religions. We can talk about both Christians and Catholicism all day and have nothing to add, this country (UK) is its natural birth place and thus how can such a conversation be even entertained. Reverse this will all said faiths, place them in a Muslim country and see how that goes down.

Still shocked that such members here like yourself actually mention such as if their is even a talk to be had about such. Muslim faith, is not trying to peacefully blend in.

originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: BlackProject

I noticed you missed off other religions from your list. Wouldn't work if you included Christianity/Catholicism, would it?

Where would the Church of England reside in this calculus? Since it was created and conceived of within Ancient England itself, I guess there's no place to deport those folks.

a reply to: BlackProject

Wait, wait, wait.

So you're only going to compare terrorists if they do it for religious reasons?

OK. Let's just give the IRA a free pass because it wasn't religious in nature.
/sarc

a reply to: BlackProject

There's plenty of Muslims who are peaceful. You just listen to the propaganda too much to notice otherwise.

originally posted by: Krakatoa

originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: BlackProject

I noticed you missed off other religions from your list. Wouldn't work if you included Christianity/Catholicism, would it?

Where would the Church of England reside in this calculus? Since it was created and conceived of within Ancient England itself, I guess there's no place to deport those folks.

My sentiments entirely.

The above posters do not seem to get this. I guess we can just forget completely about England and its heritage for these new imposter's.

originally posted by: Krakatoa

originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: BlackProject

I noticed you missed off other religions from your list. Wouldn't work if you included Christianity/Catholicism, would it?

Where would the Church of England reside in this calculus? Since it was created and conceived of within Ancient England itself, I guess there's no place to deport those folks.

That's kind of my point.

Deporting people because they're of 1 religion is stupid.

a reply to: BlackProject

So we now work on heritage?

Let's deport ALL religions. After all, this country wasn't originally Christian. It was paganism.

originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: BlackProject

There's plenty of Muslims who are peaceful. You just listen to the propaganda too much to notice otherwise.

Sure there is peaceful Muslims but if you get the time to read the Koran, its entire text is full of western hating speech and war enriched view points. It is not written in peace. So even if you wish to cut down the middle with a knife, 50/50. Even the peaceful Muslims will still secretly wish to see westerns burn.

I have known many Muslims, been good friends with them and yet I have genuinely asked their views on me and other westerns and without a flutter of the eye, they still hold strong that we should burn for our sins and that they will not rest until the western world see's only in its view of the world.

This is not propaganda, I do not watch any news. I do research, thorough research and the same result shows its face every-time.

If you really keep thinking every person who questions this faith is a propaganda steeple then your too far gone. The disinformation has you in its netting.