It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: GusMcDangerthing
It is completely untrue that this situation is enirely due to Western interventions...
So you admit the West (EU and US-- NATO) intervene in other nations?
'Interventions' is a gentle euphemism for Invasion, which is against International Law. The proof we know its illegal is we use "intervention" instead for "Humanitarian " reasons. We wage aggressive "Humane" war....
"War" is "Humane".
originally posted by: yuppa
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: GusMcDangerthing
It is completely untrue that this situation is enirely due to Western interventions...
So you admit the West (EU and US-- NATO) intervene in other nations?
'Interventions' is a gentle euphemism for Invasion, which is against International Law. The proof we know its illegal is we use "intervention" instead for "Humanitarian " reasons. We wage aggressive "Humane" war....
"War" is "Humane".
Muslims have been attacking non muslims for centuries even before western interventions. If we wanted to we could stop immigration from those countries dead and let them die of starvation and war on each other. WHich would be better actually. stop all tourism and actions in the mid east and stop importing or exporting. a global wide blockade on the middle east. lets starve them out and let nature solve the problem.
originally posted by: intrptr
originally posted by: yuppa
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: GusMcDangerthing
It is completely untrue that this situation is enirely due to Western interventions...
So you admit the West (EU and US-- NATO) intervene in other nations?
'Interventions' is a gentle euphemism for Invasion, which is against International Law. The proof we know its illegal is we use "intervention" instead for "Humanitarian " reasons. We wage aggressive "Humane" war....
"War" is "Humane".
Muslims have been attacking non muslims for centuries even before western interventions. If we wanted to we could stop immigration from those countries dead and let them die of starvation and war on each other. WHich would be better actually. stop all tourism and actions in the mid east and stop importing or exporting. a global wide blockade on the middle east. lets starve them out and let nature solve the problem.
"If We wanted"... we could fire on their vessels in the mediterranean and machine gun the survivors in the water.
Or reinvade these countries all over again and occupy their long shore lines and machine gun them before the smugglers launch the boats filled wth refugees, at night, in fog, or rain.
As far as isolating and starving them out, look at the borders of Gaza and Mexico, theres no stopping those that want to get thru, or are supposed to get thru...
originally posted by: yuppa
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: GusMcDangerthing
It is completely untrue that this situation is enirely due to Western interventions...
So you admit the West (EU and US-- NATO) intervene in other nations?
'Interventions' is a gentle euphemism for Invasion, which is against International Law. The proof we know its illegal is we use "intervention" instead for "Humanitarian " reasons. We wage aggressive "Humane" war....
"War" is "Humane".
Muslims have been attacking non muslims for centuries even before western interventions. If we wanted to we could stop immigration from those countries dead and let them die of starvation and war on each other. WHich would be better actually. stop all tourism and actions in the mid east and stop importing or exporting. a global wide blockade on the middle east. lets starve them out and let nature solve the problem.
originally posted by: Kandinsky
originally posted by: yuppa
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: GusMcDangerthing
It is completely untrue that this situation is enirely due to Western interventions...
So you admit the West (EU and US-- NATO) intervene in other nations?
'Interventions' is a gentle euphemism for Invasion, which is against International Law. The proof we know its illegal is we use "intervention" instead for "Humanitarian " reasons. We wage aggressive "Humane" war....
"War" is "Humane".
Muslims have been attacking non muslims for centuries even before western interventions. If we wanted to we could stop immigration from those countries dead and let them die of starvation and war on each other. WHich would be better actually. stop all tourism and actions in the mid east and stop importing or exporting. a global wide blockade on the middle east. lets starve them out and let nature solve the problem.
You're advocating for the extermination of about 400 million people. Brown skin doesn't mean Muslim and neither does living in the Middle East. There are Chinese, Russians, Christians, Westerners and Jews there. Essentially your paranoid fantasy is regional genocide. You'll be daydreaming of next steps? How about internment camps in other countries, no food or water, and then 'let nature solve the problem.'
originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
originally posted by: Kandinsky
originally posted by: yuppa
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: GusMcDangerthing
It is completely untrue that this situation is enirely due to Western interventions...
So you admit the West (EU and US-- NATO) intervene in other nations?
'Interventions' is a gentle euphemism for Invasion, which is against International Law. The proof we know its illegal is we use "intervention" instead for "Humanitarian " reasons. We wage aggressive "Humane" war....
"War" is "Humane".
Muslims have been attacking non muslims for centuries even before western interventions. If we wanted to we could stop immigration from those countries dead and let them die of starvation and war on each other. WHich would be better actually. stop all tourism and actions in the mid east and stop importing or exporting. a global wide blockade on the middle east. lets starve them out and let nature solve the problem.
You're advocating for the extermination of about 400 million people. Brown skin doesn't mean Muslim and neither does living in the Middle East. There are Chinese, Russians, Christians, Westerners and Jews there. Essentially your paranoid fantasy is regional genocide. You'll be daydreaming of next steps? How about internment camps in other countries, no food or water, and then 'let nature solve the problem.'
Maybe the reality check is he is far from alone in his thoughts
originally posted by: testingtesting
a reply to: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
Look I live and live and work near Bradford got Muslim work pals neighbors and just finished a relationship with a Muslim girl.
They are as Yorkshire as they come and don't have religion in the front of their minds all the time, many drink and do things that is supposed to be forbidden (just like most Christians) they are just human.
We have many different religions around here and everyone gets on, sure there is a small problem with extremists but I don't worry about them.
You say people are thinking of rounding them all up and deporting them? not around here most around here would fight for our fellow Yorkshire men despite their skin colour.
People just want a safe place to bring up their family in my experience.
I suggest to many afraid in this thread to grow some balls. and stop using excuses like all this to hate brown skinned folk because that is the crux of the matter.
originally posted by: testingtesting
a reply to: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
Ooops replied to the wrong poster sorry
originally posted by: Krakatoa
originally posted by: intrptr
originally posted by: yuppa
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: GusMcDangerthing
It is completely untrue that this situation is enirely due to Western interventions...
So you admit the West (EU and US-- NATO) intervene in other nations?
'Interventions' is a gentle euphemism for Invasion, which is against International Law. The proof we know its illegal is we use "intervention" instead for "Humanitarian " reasons. We wage aggressive "Humane" war....
"War" is "Humane".
Muslims have been attacking non muslims for centuries even before western interventions. If we wanted to we could stop immigration from those countries dead and let them die of starvation and war on each other. WHich would be better actually. stop all tourism and actions in the mid east and stop importing or exporting. a global wide blockade on the middle east. lets starve them out and let nature solve the problem.
"If We wanted"... we could fire on their vessels in the mediterranean and machine gun the survivors in the water.
Or reinvade these countries all over again and occupy their long shore lines and machine gun them before the smugglers launch the boats filled wth refugees, at night, in fog, or rain.
As far as isolating and starving them out, look at the borders of Gaza and Mexico, theres no stopping those that want to get thru, or are supposed to get thru...
Definition of hyperbole
: extravagant exaggeration (such as “mile-high ice-cream cones”)
If we wanted to we could stop immigration from those countries dead and let them die of starvation and war on each other.
I suggest to many afraid in this thread to grow some balls. and stop using excuses like all this to hate brown skinned folk because that is the crux of the matter.
I try to explain to folk outside here it does work we are all getting along and the biggest problem everyone has is that many are skint.
I try to explain to folk outside here it does work we are all getting along and the biggest problem everyone has is that many are skint. We have some gangs around my way but they are white, black asian just normal idiot young lads who want more money tbh.