New video of explosion at the Twin Towers without a plane

originally posted by: neutronflux

originally posted by: samkent
a reply to: AgarthaSeed

I simply don't believe the OS and believe it was an inside job.

Which parts were the inside job(s)?

Why would crashing a plane in Shanksville further the secret cause more than the first three planes?

Remember for a conspiracy to be 'plausible' each aspect of the events must be explained in terms of the grand conspiracy.
Meaning if the beams were precut who would do such a thing and still remain silent.
If the planes were really missiles all the witnesses must have been in on it too.

You can't conclude all the aspects of 911 were faked or planned just because you thing buildings should topple over.

Why was the pentagon hit again? Hitting a small section of a building the size of 24 football fields was going to destroy all financial records for ever other military base, ship, treasury records, money transfer records, banking records, and outside departmental audits that were already conducted?

You don't get it. The pentagon was prepared with explosives. It was an inside job, and those on the inside knew where the auditors were working, and where the important and incriminating records were kept.

Inside job, all the way.

a reply to: Salander

You backed it was a military jet drone? A Douglas A3? Now its explosives?

Let's start with the truth movement statement that the pentagon concrete floors were untouched. How did explosives push in the entrance hole, take out whole columns, and leave no pitting or a crater in the pentagon concrete floor?

How did explosives move items in the construction yard towards the pentagon and not destroy the items in the construction yard?

Where was the indicative demolitions shrapnel that should have been everywhere and blown out the pentagon windows along with the pressure wave? A pressure wave that should have also knocked down trees and vegetation.

Why was the interior of the pentagon not exploded on to the pentagon lawn.

Where and how much staged fuel would it take to create the witnessesed fireball.

What did over a hundred eyewitnesses see fly into the pentagon?

a reply to: Salander

What was the supposed impossible maneuver again?

a reply to: Salander

The pentagon was prepared with explosives. It was an inside job, and those on the inside knew where the auditors were working, and where the important and incriminating records were kept.

That's utterly stupid.
Financial records can be reconstructed from the other end.
That assumes they didn't have a backup. You know like any other business.

This conspiracy is getting dumber.

originally posted by: manuelram16
a reply to: Zaphod58

Have you read the theory by John Lear on 911 ? if so what do you think ?

Here are some quotes on the B25 crash into the Empire State Building I have a thread about that.

The bomber was flying relatively slowly and quite low, seeking better visibility, when it came upon the Chrysler Building in midtown. It swerved to avoid the building but the move sent it straight into the north side of the Empire State Building, near the 79th floor.

Upon impact, the plane’s jet fuel exploded, filling the interior of the building with flames all the way down to the 75th floor and sending flames out of the hole the plane had ripped open in the building’s side.

While the 78th and 79th floors bore the brunt of the damage, one of the B-25's engines fell down an elevator shaft and set off a major fire in the basement. The other engine hurtled across the building and tore through seven walls before emerging from the 33rd Street side of the tower. The debris crashed through the roof of a thirteen-story building across the street where another fire erupted. Other heavy wreckage, including the landing gear, also caused damage to the Empire State and nearby buildings while Stan Lomax reportedly saw part of a wing catapulting towards Madison Avenue.

An engine snapped an elevator cable while at least one woman was riding in the elevator car. The emergency auto brake saved the woman from crashing to the bottom, but the engine fell down the shaft and landed on top of it. Quick-thinking rescuers pulled the woman from the elevator, saving her life.

So elevator cables damage same happened at 9/11 although again many truthers would say that can't have happened.

Also can you imagine if we had the internet back then if people read this below.

The body of the Navy hitch-hiker Albert Perna was found two days after the crash at the bottom of an elevator shaft

Now do the events above not sound similar to 9/11 yet caused by a plane a lot smaller lighter & slower.

Some pictures from the Empire State Crash.

a reply to: samkent

Not dumber, but more convoluted, more involved. Stuff like Japanese gold and other intrigue. The validation of government bonds without identification of ownership. Really intricate details. Quite