It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Ohanka
a reply to: Deaf Alien
Lack of people of colour in lead roles and there not being enough women at the beach is not a valid criticism for a film about Dunkirk.
The trio of timelines can be jarring as you figure out how they all fit, and the fact that there are only a couple of women and no lead actors of color may rub some the wrong way.
originally posted by: Domo1
a reply to: Deaf Alien
Tone Deaf Alien.
Dude, you always seem to miss the point. That, or you get it and try to twist it into something it isn't. This isn't complaining about VALID criticism of the film, it's about morons criticizing it because it's accurate and doesn't bend over backwards trying to appease Black Live Matter or GLAAD.
At some point someone is going to complain that a black transgender doesn't get to play Eleanor Roosevelt.
How do you figure that in his twitter?
originally posted by: Domo1
a reply to: Deaf Alien
How do you figure that in his twitter?
You can't be serious. I'm starting to think you're a super subtle troll.
originally posted by: crazyewok
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Bluntone22
I know.
When I watched The Three Stooges, there were no Chinese people in it.
Racist!
And why are there no disabled lesbian native American's in hunt for red October?
but
Dummy Domo
you miss my point
It is no different than Christians complaining about movies about Jesus.
If you said Christians complaining that Jesus wasn't depicted as a blonde haired blue eyed person, I would get the comparison.