a reply to:
All Seeing Eye
If I may interject, I'd like to address some of your concerns. Please understand that I am not doing this on behalf of 'network dude'; he will more
than likely reply to you, too [and for all I know, he might have already replied to you while I was engaged in writing this], and he might very well
disagree with me, and that's perfectly okay because, you see, Masons are individually entitled to their own opinions, and our opinions do not have to
be identical. That is why we are 'Free'-Masons (unlike the cults, which some have uncritically labelled us as).
First off, I apologize for posting a rude comment about you earlier, with regard to your intelligence. I misjudged you, or unfairly judged you; and, I
should never have judged you in the first place. You are very 'bright', indeed, judging by the quality of your posts. It was ungentlemanly of me to
criticize you. Besides, it reflected poorly on the Fraternity to which I belong, for which I am also sorry. I hope you (as well as the members of this
forum who might have seen my negative comment about you) will forgive me. I hereby retract it.
So then....
taking an oath means ...
We are somewhat in agreement with regard to what taking an oath entails. To take a Masonic oath, however, is something much deeper than what you have
declared about taking an oath. You said it means to...
submit completely to it.
Yes, to a certain degree but, not quite.
Drawing from 'The Work', a book that we all rely upon as Freemasons as our 'guiding light'; first, and in the Masonic sense, to take an oath means to
take a "solemn obligation", "founded on the principles" of Masonic "piety and virtue". "...[V]ows of fidelity are required" that "are not inconsistent
with...civil, moral or religious duties". In other words, if the Masonic oath conflicts with your social mores and values, you should not take it. You
should not 'submit' to anything you don't feel comfortable with. For this reason, I respect your decision not to join our Fraternity. You seem to have
decided that it would conflict with your own "civil, moral or religious duties" , which ought to take priority in life. That is honourable of you.
That is what we believe.
Secondly, before taking the 'oath', the Master of the Lodge ensures that each candidate for initiation is informed of the following, from which, if he
does not agree, he is free to retreat (he may leave the Lodge; the ceremony would then come to an end, and we would go on about our regular business;
although, I myself have never witnessed this happen): The Master says, "Mr. [so-and-so], it is my duty to inform you that Masonry, being free,
requires a perfect freedom of inclination in every candidate for its mysteries".
In other words, you must come for initiation of your own volition because it is something your heart compels you to do. In fact, the first question
asked of a candidate is, "Where were you first made a Mason"? The response to that question (which only the candidate himself can know whether or not
it is a genuine response) is, "In my heart...."
Thus, every candidate enbarks upon the path of initiation of his own free will; then, if he agrees to it, he will continue upon his journey and freely
volunteer to take "vows of fidelity" which oblige him to "keep inviolate the secrets and mysteries of the Order". (Question: What are those "secrets
and mysteries"? That is for us to know, and for you to find out! Hint: 'Modes of Recognition'.) : )
The obligation, or 'oath', is then taken "in the presence of the Great Architect of the Universe" and witnessed by all the Brethren present. It is a
very solemn promise made to your God and to the worldwide Order of Ancient, Free and Accepted Masons.
Essentially, then, you are correct: taking the Masonic oath does mean to "submit completely" - but not to anyone or anything other than to the terms
and conditions of your contract, so to speak.
You could think of it as a contract between you and your God. It is a "sacred promise", a "pledge of your fidelity"; and, initiation into a Lodge
(which is the most ancient of communal traditions) is designed to induct you into an order of "men who prize honour and virtue above the external
advantages of rank and fortune"; and, to encourage you to become, more and more, just such a man who also prizes the same in his own life. That, in my
estimation, is worth submitting to!
In doing so, you submit to your own God and show it by maintaining your honour in the eyes of a community of your Brethren who all have devoted
themselves to the very same objective. (It's not easy! Nor is supposed to be easy to 'find the Holy Grail'.)
Imagine: You have just taken your vows and are now a part of something larger and greater than yourself, something that truly transcends 'you' in time
and space. It is a certain 'je ne c'est quoi'; something that we, as Masons, take very seriously; an ideal, perhaps; and, we try to spead that
transcendent ideal all over the world. It is an ideal that transcends all division. That is, you are now part of a worldwide Fraternity whose members
hold sacred the concepts of Brotherly Love, Relief and Truth, the Fatherhood of God, the Brotherhood of man, peace, freedom and harmony under the one
canopy of heaven - and who strive in unity to put those concepts into practice. Is there something wrong with that?
Respectfully.