The transgender con ? Many transgender regret switch

a reply to: Sheye

You are the one who brought attention to transgender people with your OP.
That is like asking why liberals start threads after so many anti-liberal threads on this site.

Here's a question: if a boy wants to be an actor and his father wants him to be a doctor and forces him to take school for it and the boy ends up being depressed, maybe killing himself. Who is to blame? According to you, the transgender children are to blame.

originally posted by: Deaf Alien
a reply to: Sheye

You are the one who brought attention to transgender people with your OP.
That is like asking why liberals start threads after so many anti-liberal threads on this site.

Here's a question: if a boy wants to be an actor and his father wants him to be a doctor and forces him to take school for it and the boy ends up being depressed, maybe killing himself. Who is to blame? According to you, the transgender children are to blame.

You're doing it again, twisting my words. The 13 year old who killed herself had family support , as well as school
support.

Where did I say a child who thinks it is transgendered, with no support from parents ,is to blame for their suicide ?

Children can get depressed for so many reasons , and they sometimes do the unthinkable.

The whole issue is a sad slippery slope that any decent parent would try and steer their child away from.

a reply to: Sheye

When it comes off as concern trolling. Saying we're biased, not logical and basing replies off of reality is pretty demeaning.

No one said you can't post, in fact the brunt of trans threads on this site are anti. There are multiple ones a week now, used to be about one per month or less. You have to realize we will counter your "concerned opinions".

a reply to: Sheye
That's only one thread that countered the couple or many ones that said that Transgender is mental illness. Why did they post it, best to ask them. Maybe they are tired of the dis-info threads turned out every week that many ignore?

a reply to: Sheye

You might want to watch the movie "Dead Poets Society".
And I noticed that you have no comment on "Jesus Camp". What they are doing is one of the most worse things they are doing to the children, indoctrinating the children in the worst way. And why are you not concerned about the sexualization of the children through TV and movies, especially child beauty pageants and such thing? And why are you are focusing on the non-existent ant on the elephant?
I am as concerned for the children as you are.

a reply to: Sheye

There have studies after that time, which have been shared many times on these threads.

The Witherspoon Institute is being intellectually dishonest and have an agenda which is funded by their 501 (c) donations.

The Witherspoon Institute opposes abortion and same-sex marriage[8] and deals with embryonic stem cell research, constitutional law, and globalization.[3] In 2003, it organized a conference on religion in modern societies.[9] In 2006, Republican Senator Sam Brownback cited a Witherspoon document called Marriage and the Public Good: Ten Principles in a debate over a constitutional amendment against same-sex marriage.[3] It held a conference about pornography named The Social Costs of Pornography[10] at Princeton University in December 2008.[11]

en.wikipedia.org...

a reply to: AMPTAH

It's just "a choice". And we respect people's choices. But, we will open our mouths and tell them what we think, so that they will have heard all the arguments for and against, before taking the plunge.

Most would agree that's no problem. My point was we aren't a perfect world and regrets will happen.

originally posted by: dreamingawake
a reply to: Sheye

There have studies after that time, which have been shared many times on these threads.

The Witherspoon Institute is being intellectually dishonest and have an agenda which is funded by their 501 (c) donations.

The Witherspoon Institute opposes abortion and same-sex marriage[8] and deals with embryonic stem cell research, constitutional law, and globalization.[3] In 2003, it organized a conference on religion in modern societies.[9] In 2006, Republican Senator Sam Brownback cited a Witherspoon document called Marriage and the Public Good: Ten Principles in a debate over a constitutional amendment against same-sex marriage.[3] It held a conference about pornography named The Social Costs of Pornography[10] at Princeton University in December 2008.[11]

en.wikipedia.org...

They sound like an awesome institute full of common sense and wisdom 😁

a reply to: Sheye

True colours showing through. Jesus would not be proud.

originally posted by: testingtesting
a reply to: Sheye

True colours showing through. Jesus would not be proud.

originally posted by: testingtesting
a reply to: Sheye

True colours showing through. Jesus would not be proud.

I'm sure Jesus would agree with me .

If God & Jesus themselves came down skipping hand-in-hand & God said "They're not f#ed up, I f#ed up in the shop, botched a few Human builds. Even messed up with Jesus -- it's Jessica now, so get it right. Sorry folks, let them fix my blueprint mistakes, m'kay?" the Christian right would STILL argue til they're blue in the face. And this coming from the same goddamn people who insist God's infallible and makes no design mistakes in the first place.

originally posted by: Nyiah
If God & Jesus themselves came down skipping hand-in-hand & God said "They're not f#ed up, I f#ed up in the shop, botched a few Human builds. Even messed up with Jesus -- it's Jessica now, so get it right. Sorry folks, let them fix my blueprint mistakes, m'kay?" the Christian right would STILL argue til they're blue in the face. And this coming from the same goddamn people who insist God's infallible and makes no design mistakes in the first place.

a reply to: Sheye

No he would be disgusted at your fake moral concern which you unsuccessfully attempt use to disguise your own bigotry.

originally posted by: testingtesting
a reply to: Sheye

No he would be disgusted at your fake moral concern which you unsuccessfully attempt use to disguise your own bigotry.

He knows my heart ... and time will tell who is correct. I'm patient...I'm willing to wait for confirmation from the living Christ.

originally posted by: Sheye

originally posted by: testingtesting
a reply to: Sheye

No he would be disgusted at your fake moral concern which you unsuccessfully attempt use to disguise your own bigotry.

He knows my heart ... and time will tell who is correct. I'm patient...I'm willing to wait for confirmation from the living Christ.

I actually understand your concern, believe it or not. It might be misguided but I do see your point of view.
ETA - I meant the point of view about transgender children.

originally posted by: Sheye

originally posted by: dreamingawake
a reply to: Sheye

There have studies after that time, which have been shared many times on these threads.

The Witherspoon Institute is being intellectually dishonest and have an agenda which is funded by their 501 (c) donations.

The Witherspoon Institute opposes abortion and same-sex marriage[8] and deals with embryonic stem cell research, constitutional law, and globalization.[3] In 2003, it organized a conference on religion in modern societies.[9] In 2006, Republican Senator Sam Brownback cited a Witherspoon document called Marriage and the Public Good: Ten Principles in a debate over a constitutional amendment against same-sex marriage.[3] It held a conference about pornography named The Social Costs of Pornography[10] at Princeton University in December 2008.[11]

en.wikipedia.org...

They sound like an awesome institute full of common sense and wisdom 😁

If it's filled with common sense and wisdom why was a main study by them, a LIE?

Documents Reveal Anti-Gay Parenting Study Was Manipulated To Influence Supreme Court

Mark Regnerus has admitted his “family structures” study didn’t actually measure gay parenting, comparing the children of separated parents who had same-sex relationships with those of married opposite-sex parents. An internal auditor of the journal that published the Regnerus study last year concluded its findings were “bull#” because this false comparison doesn’t adequately measure same-sex parenting.

Source

Using 'Pseudoscience' to Undermine Same-Sex Parents

Justice: This is an important tell. At times, social science may be used in the service of justice, influencing the decisions of lawmakers or judges or everyday citizens. But this is problematic when the veneer of science is used to disguise an argument for a deeply help moral or religious belief. By design, social-scientific research is meant to be transparent, testable, and reproducible at every step; but in reality, regular people don't necessarily have the skills or interest or time to engage in that kind of process. Instead, as the large audience for the Witherspoon Institute's post shows, people may be drawn to articles that confirm what they already think.

Source

How many more skewed studies are fraudulently presenting for the almighty partisan buck?

originally posted by: Sheye

originally posted by: testingtesting
a reply to: Sheye

True colours showing through. Jesus would not be proud.

I'm sure Jesus would agree with me .

When did Jesus say being transgender was a sin?

And if he didn't what would he agree with you on?

originally posted by: Hazardous1408

originally posted by: Sheye

originally posted by: testingtesting
a reply to: Sheye

True colours showing through. Jesus would not be proud.

I'm sure Jesus would agree with me .

When did Jesus say being transgender was a sin?

And if he didn't what would he agree with you on?

He didn't even say being gay was a sin.