Russian Collusion Timeline

This thread will be based on a image I obtained from a friend of friend, a little birdie,social network that will remain anonymous. This was originally posted during May 2017, and I uploaded the timeline image here around that same time. Since then I have "inserted" the timeline image into numerous political threads and have yet to see any real response. With that being said I want to post it officially to ATS to really break it down and expand on the accuracy and the chronological timeline. Please feel free to edit Change debunk confirm share and reply

Can we all agree to deny ignorance together, I hope so!

Happy hunting ATS...

a reply to: iWontGiveUP

Meh at your timeline.

For a much more comprehensive timeline, including source material, dates, quotes ect --

Click this link for the Trump/Russia Wiki

I don't have the biggest monitor in the world.

Even when zooming I cannot make out what this thing says.

looks interesting though.

a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin

Right click, "view image".

It doesn't contain sources or anything and lacks a lot of context.

a reply to: Kettu

ahhh thanks for that mate!

originally posted by: Kettu
a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin

Right click, "view image".

It doesn't contain sources or anything and lacks a lot of context.

Roger that! But it's bullet points only

Keep it Simple

Let the courts do the paperwork

Keep it Simple ATS

Thanks

originally posted by: Kettu
a reply to: iWontGiveUP

Meh at your timeline.

For a much more comprehensive timeline, including source material, dates, quotes ect --

Click this link for the Trump/Russia Wiki

Thank you for posting this.

This would actually be really good if it was a interactive info-graphic.

Like each box had links that would provide the source material and expand with more information on each step.

a reply to: Kettu

Wow. Thanks for that link.

Wonderful timeline.
Most helpful. Thanks.

I want the help of ATS to create a new timeline with facts

And thanks for the Reddit thread Kerri, but wow, I'm not a lawyer!

By all means create a new bubble timeline, cross out and make additions

But keep it Simple and to the facts please

Me heard hurts with links

This timeline is just plain false.. the whole basis of this timeline is that Trump never colluded with Russia.

We know he did.

Also what about the recorded conversation of Paul Ryan and other Hop members over a year ago talking about trumps Russia ties.. this doesn't add up

originally posted by: Lucidparadox
This timeline is just plain false.. the whole basis of this timeline is that Trump never colluded with Russia.

We know he did.

Also what about the recorded conversation of Paul Ryan and other Hop members over a year ago talking about trumps Russia ties.. this doesn't add up

Who is we?

What is collusion?

Pass go, please take $200

The multiple investigations involving CFO/CGI,
the 08-16 and all his team, and GOP led by (no-stretch)
Seriously?

The collusion was and is the ongoing NEVERTRUMP

The "tenor" of the graphical timeline... versus the linked timeline that Kettu posted are entirely different.

One biases towards Trump and the other biases against Trump.

Both rely on individual perception bias.

I think the inference of motivation is more accurate in the graphical one, personally. Somehow we have managed to have knowledge of EVERY MANNER OF THING Trump has done in private "leaked" by Intel "stay behind" insiders...

...but the "Russia" meme that has pushed the Trump "Manchurian Candidate" narrative has failed to come up with any actual evidence of crimes being committed. No leaks of evidence or "smoking guns"... in close to a year now.

NOTE: Before anyone starts screeching about the recent "Don Jr." Russian lawyer scandal... let me repeat "...EVIDENCE OF CRIMES" is what I said.

Somehow the left has managed to make everything Trump does (...that is part of the political slime process going on for decades.) "Illegal". It's not... and the more informed segment of the population, regardless of their politics knows that.

Of course... this is also why CNN's viewership has dropped off the cliff in the last month. Reasonable people on BOTH sides of the political constituency are just tired of their bulls**t.

I will say, that there has been a tremendous amount of "Amateur hour" BS from the Trump White House. They really underestimated, as did most of us civilians, how much "stay behind" political garbage effects the day to day operation of the gubnit.

Reince Priebus is a tender lilly as Chief of Staff. They should have had a ball buster conservative of the leadership style of Rahm Emanuel as COS.

I think they should institute a scorched earth flush out of ANYONE who has stayed behind that has in ANY way worked to oppose the elected POTUS. Hate him or love him... he was elected in the manner proscribed by the U.S. Constitution... and as such working deliberately against him while in the employ of the administration he heads is oppositional to the American Rule of Law... not to mention common decency.

Folks who are leaking... they need to start putting them in prison. Politics should ALWAYS take the back seat to following the Rule of Law.

a reply to: dasman888

Roger that!

Well said Sir!

originally posted by: dasman888
The "tenor" of the graphical timeline... versus the linked timeline that Kettu posted are entirely different.

One biases towards Trump and the other biases against Trump.

Both rely on individual perception bias.

I think the inference of motivation is more accurate in the graphical one, personally. Somehow we have managed to have knowledge of EVERY MANNER OF THING Trump has done in private "leaked" by Intel "stay behind" insiders...

...but the "Russia" meme that has pushed the Trump "Manchurian Candidate" narrative has failed to come up with any actual evidence of crimes being committed. No leaks of evidence or "smoking guns"... in close to a year now.

NOTE: Before anyone starts screeching about the recent "Don Jr." Russian lawyer scandal... let me repeat "...EVIDENCE OF CRIMES" is what I said.

Somehow the left has managed to make everything Trump does (...that is part of the political slime process going on for decades.) "Illegal". It's not... and the more informed segment of the population, regardless of their politics knows that.

Of course... this is also why CNN's viewership has dropped off the cliff in the last month. Reasonable people on BOTH sides of the political constituency are just tired of their bulls**t.

I will say, that there has been a tremendous amount of "Amateur hour" BS from the Trump White House. They really underestimated, as did most of us civilians, how much "stay behind" political garbage effects the day to day operation of the gubnit.

Reince Priebus is a tender lilly as Chief of Staff. They should have had a ball buster conservative of the leadership style of Rahm Emanuel as COS.

I think they should institute a scorched earth flush out of ANYONE who has stayed behind that has in ANY way worked to oppose the elected POTUS. Hate him or love him... he was elected in the manner proscribed by the U.S. Constitution... and as such working deliberately against him while in the employ of the administration he heads is oppositional to the American Rule of Law... not to mention common decency.

Folks who are leaking... they need to start putting them in prison. Politics should ALWAYS take the back seat to following the Rule of Law.

I might add, the troubles CNN is having should scare the CRAP out of the Democrats. CNN's viewer constituency leans left of center... which suggests that they have lost a LOT of the folks who are already left of center, over their droll "Russia!" screed...

Further evidence that a minority base of rabid left ideologues is STILL literally destroying the DNC's chance of relevancy in 2020.

So far they have managed to distract large numbers of folks from the "So, lets talk about how you f**ked Bernie Sanders... and told millions of us YOU get to install whomever you want (i.e., elections are a theatrical formality)" but the closer we get to 2020, the bigger of a problem the DNC is going to have with the kill Bernie's campaign realities.

Expect some Power Elites to actually move to form a more "moderate" Third Party before 2020... which will be a very carefully scripted "marketing pitch" to the kind of folks that voted for Trump and Sanders. Third part politics is coming to America soon... and the elites want to get out in front of it.

a reply to: iWontGiveUP


Is the Ukraine part of Russia?

""California Rep. Adam Schiff said Sunday that fellow Washington Democrats acted “inappropriately” if they indeed met with Ukrainian officials to get potentially damaging information on 2016 GOP presidential nominee Donald Trump.""

www.foxnews.com... html

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: iWontGiveUP


Is the Ukraine part of Russia?

""California Rep. Adam Schiff said Sunday that fellow Washington Democrats acted “inappropriately” if they indeed met with Ukrainian officials to get potentially damaging information on 2016 GOP presidential nominee Donald Trump.""

www.foxnews.com... html

Do you mean, is it part of the United States? No... it is not. Nor is it part of Russia... although The Crimea arguably was... prior to a vote on Crimea's Independence that saw better than 90% of Crimea's population vote for Independence from the Ukraine, which included a close strategic alignment with the Russian Republic.

DNC shenanigans with Ukraine were "Inappropriate?" That's a fair statement. It apply's to Don Jr.'s meeting with the Russian Lawyer as well. Not at all illegal... but certainly, a poorly executed suaré, to be sure.

Yeah... that was the western media's "Russian military takeover" of Crimea CNN/MSNBC/FAUX news and the print media keeps harping about...

90% PLUS of the Crimean population votes to break away from the Ukraine, and American/European media sells it as a Russian Military takeover.

The saddest thing about it... most Americans actually believe western media's account of it.

originally posted by: dasman888

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: iWontGiveUP


Is the Ukraine part of Russia?

""California Rep. Adam Schiff said Sunday that fellow Washington Democrats acted “inappropriately” if they indeed met with Ukrainian officials to get potentially damaging information on 2016 GOP presidential nominee Donald Trump.""

www.foxnews.com... html

Do you mean, is it part of the United States? No... it is not. Nor is it part of Russia... although The Crimea arguably was... prior to a vote on Crimea's Independence that saw better than 90% of Crimea's population vote for Independence from the Ukraine, which included a close strategic alignment with the Russian Republic.

DNC shenanigans with Ukraine were "Inappropriate?" That's a fair statement. It apply's to Don Jr.'s meeting with the Russian Lawyer as well. Not at all illegal... but certainly, a poorly executed suaré, to be sure.

Yeah... that was the western media's "Russian military takeover" of Crimea CNN/MSNBC/FAUX news and the print media keeps harping about...

90% PLUS of the Crimean population votes to break away from the Ukraine, and American/European media sells it as a Russian Military takeover.

The saddest thing about it... most Americans actually believe western media's account of it.

All I see is clarity, all I hear is a whistle