It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
“Toby . . . I created a TV network for people 55 to dead,” Ailes said.
“What does our viewer look like?
“They look like me…white guys in mostly Red State counties who sit on their couch with the remote in their hand all day and night.”
“What do they want to see”
“They want to see YOU tear those smug condescending know-it-all East Coast liberals to pieces . . limb by limb . . . until they jump up out of their LaZ boy and scream “Way to go Toby…you KILLED that libtard!”
The outcomes for Fox’s “panel debates” have ALWAYS been carefully fixed by the producers so that the home team (i.e, the conservative panelists like me) ALWAYS won.
MORE simply: The staged gladiatorial-like rhetorical fight to the death the Fox viewer loves to watch are ALWAYS fixed by the show producers for the conservative actor to win…always.
Just like pro-wrestling, the panel opinion programs are carefully staged and choreographed by Fox producers so the viewers home team (in WWE language the “Baby Face”) always wins over the “Heel” aka the poor pathetic “libtard.”
The Fox News opinion panel scam works like this. More often than not, in my panel segments I was the protagonist or “designated hit man” aka the one called on by the host (as instructed by the producers in my ear or the ear of the host) to “kill ‘em.” You’d know I was the designated hit man when the panel show hosts tossed the final death blow 15–20 seconds to me when they say “Toby you have the final word.”
But before I delivered the final rhetorical death blow …understand the producer of the segment had given me my script 24 hours BEFORE the show started . I knew 24–48 hours in ADVANCE of taping how the designated liberal was going to argue his/her point…and more important how I was going to win the day with our partisan audience.
Bill O’Reilly was the only on-air talent that, when you were a guest expert on this show and on the Fox payroll, told you what he wanted you to say.
He would literally come into your earpiece before your “hit” aka appearance on a Factor segment and say “Smith…here’s how it goes down. You said last time oil prices were going higher…I said lower…well they are lower and I’m going to blame the oil companies. You bit is to support them, capiche?”
Well…he was dead wrong and I told him that and his answer was “Is this the Tobin Smith show? If it is, say what you want. But if this is the O’Reilly show you give what I want.”
OK Bill…and that was the last time I was on The Factor after 40+ appearances.
Key Point: IF your role on Fox News is to be a conservative, you are expected to play that role IF you are getting paid as a contributor. IF you are a unpaid conservative and don’t act like one on the air, your number is lost and your Fox talking head career is over. Period.
At Fox ALL the actors are expected to play their roles according to their partisan political ideology in the 8-minute performance art act that was being staged for delight of >68 year old men in Small Town America.
I can tell you (with very few exceptions) that a big part of the Fox News “fair and balanced” scam was also built from this reality: articulate, principled, worldly liberals — especially women — don’t exist in Roger’s Fox News world.
The designated liberals job was simple: make the viewer so enraged from their recitation of hated liberal/progressive ideology (theology that the Fox viewer of course had been taught to hate from decades of listening to thousands of hours of conservative talk radio) that the viewer literally felt like “throwing a brick through my TV screen.”
originally posted by: Perfectenemy
a reply to: Krazysh0t
Btw CNN is on the record for doing just the same.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: Perfectenemy
a reply to: Krazysh0t
Btw CNN is on the record for doing just the same.
Really? Then by all means, prove it.
Btw CNN is on the record for doing just the same.
originally posted by: NowanKenubi
When they asked for a license to establish themselves in Canada, it was refused because in Canada, there are laws that prevent news agencies from creating false news; they have to tell the truth...
Whether Canadian journalists are honest is for another thread, but there is that.
Surely someone in Canada knew something about Fox...
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: Perfectenemy
a reply to: Krazysh0t
Btw CNN is on the record for doing just the same.
Really? Then by all means, prove it.
originally posted by: NowanKenubi
When they asked for a license to establish themselves in Canada, it was refused because in Canada, there are laws that prevent news agencies from creating false news; they have to tell the truth...
Whether Canadian journalists are honest is for another thread, but there is that.
Surely someone in Canada knew something about Fox...
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Perfectenemy
Oh that...
Btw CNN is on the record for doing just the same.
You said it was on the record. That is YOUR claim. So where is this record that proves CNN does the same things as Fox News?
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: NowanKenubi
When they asked for a license to establish themselves in Canada, it was refused because in Canada, there are laws that prevent news agencies from creating false news; they have to tell the truth...
Whether Canadian journalists are honest is for another thread, but there is that.
Surely someone in Canada knew something about Fox...
This article merely confirms many of my suspicious about the network all along. The way they spin reality is almost satirical in nature. It's just sad that it is designed to be targeted to the most vulnerable and gullible in the nation.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: Perfectenemy
a reply to: Krazysh0t
Btw CNN is on the record for doing just the same.
Really? Then by all means, prove it.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: network dude
Are you trolling? I never disconfirmed his claim. I asked him to prove it. Why are you deflecting with nonsense? If it is true then produce this supposed "record". I'll be happy to read it like I read the article in the OP. Though I find it annoying that the first poster in the thread deflected my OP about Fox News to talk about CNN and you are carrying that torch for him.
originally posted by: Perfectenemy
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: network dude
Are you trolling? I never disconfirmed his claim. I asked him to prove it. Why are you deflecting with nonsense? If it is true then produce this supposed "record". I'll be happy to read it like I read the article in the OP. Though I find it annoying that the first poster in the thread deflected my OP about Fox News to talk about CNN and you are carrying that torch for him.
I'm not deflecting anything. I just pointed out that this is nothing new. I don't give a # what Fox news has to say. You're just another hypocrite.