There was a report that North Korea has presented to its adoring populace a documentary video of sorts demonstrating North Korea’s military might
attacking and blowing up America.
More recently, there is a report of a successful test launch of a long range missile by North Korea, a missile reputed to be capable of reaching
Alaska, maybe even farther, this report coming on the heels of reports of North Korea’s attempts at attaining nuclear capabilities.
If these reports are true, then North Korea may very well be setting itself up to be blamed for a false flag attack against the United States of
America.
If these reports are false, then North Korea can still be set up for a possible false flag attack by other forces of evil.
I am not digressing here... I think that it is a bit coincidental at this time that it was reported in the news that the Russian Kremlin is losing its
patience with the U.S. over U.S. sanctions against Russia having not been lifted by now. This seems to establish an adversarial relationship between
Russia and the United States, or...
... or is something else going on??
Is the real intention of the Kremlin’s li’l tantrum to create an illusion of an adversarial relationship between U.S. President Donald Trump and
good ol’ pal Russian President Vladimir Putin and not nation v. nation?
Think about the sanctions. Don’t you think that it is some L of a nerve on the part of the Kremlin to basically demand back two luxury compounds in
the U.S., compounds that have served as hangouts and bases of operations for Russian spies to do their dastardly things against the U.S.? Don’t you
think that it is a sad commentary for the Kremlin to pretty much express economic desperation due to being restrained from doing business with U.S.
interests (to wit, the $500,000,000,000 oil deal between Russia and ExxonMobil that was kiboshed by the sanctions)? Come on, is Russia that dependent
on the U.S.? Why is it that Russia can’t make up for lost U.S. business by doing business with the rest of the world?
Something smells. Things are not what they appear to be, and this takes me back to the premise, above, which is that it appears that there is a desire
to create an ILLUSION of an adversarial relationship between Trump and Putin.
Just look to Trump’s nonsensical, inconsequential bombing of Syria a few weeks ago. One of Trump’s sons went right before a television camera to
exclaim that daddy’s bombing of Syria
PROVES that Trump is not in bed with Putin. WHAAAAATTT?!?! How does a nonsensical and inconsequential
action prove anything? There is a smelly agenda here, folks
So, if there is a false flag attack with the backdrop of a contrived, faux adversarial relationship between U.S. and Russia or, alternatively, between
Trump and Putin, than this would have people placing Russian and Putin low on the list of those suspected of that false flag attack, for why would
adversarial Russia do anything to benefit Trump? At least, this is how it would play out in the mind of a leader with a four-year-old’s
mentality.
Trump is feeling the heat of his own stupid tweets and his own foolishly loose lips.
Trump is feeling the heat of calls for impeachment.
Trump is feeling the heat of lawsuits regarding his [alleged] violations of the emoluments clause of the Constitution and [alleged] violations of the
Presidential Records law... and there, to be sure, will be more to come.
Putin is feeling the heat of civil unrest in his failing empire which has suffered a huge drop in per capital GDP in just the last few years and which
is losing 750,000 people from its population per year.
Wag the Dog???
Time and time again throughout history, what has served as the most obvious and logical (“logical???”) tactic to divert attention away from calls
to impeach and replace? ANSWER: WAR!!
Who and what will make a convenient patsy if a nuclear weapon is deployed against the U.S. (maybe not to do extreme damage, maybe just to unleash an
electro-magnetic pulse to fire the flames of war mongering)? ANSWER: NORTH KOREA, of course... a patsy made to order!
Remember the adage: “Don’t change horses in midstream.”
edit on 5-7-2017 by theworldisnotenough because: Added a clause for clarity of idea.