It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The Clinton campaign, however, has yet to produce any evidence that any specific emails in the latest leak were fraudulent.
originally posted by: dawnstar
a reply to: OccamsRazor04
hillary might not have denied them but Kaine did!!
and no, I aint gonna point out which ones they were, I never even read them the first time.
but I do know that Kaine said that there were ones that pertained to him that weren't true!!
and, I believe him...
nor do we have anything but Kaine’s word to refute the idea that he knew about his nomination in advance. We reached out to Mullen, but he declined to comment.
We do know, though, that no one has doctored this particular email. Well-known hacker Robert Graham verified the email’s digital signature, a tool email providers use to confirm that an email actually came from the provider’s server without alteration.
These digital signatures are embedded in the raw sources available on the WikiLeaks website and can be used to "concretely prove that many of the emails in the Wikileaks dump are undoctored," said cybersecurity consultant Matt Tait.
originally posted by: BlueAjah
a reply to: Sillyolme
They were told in public congressional testimony by Clapper that their information was not correct, yet they waited until now to file a retraction. Why did they not correct their reporting right at that time? There must be some reason. Something has changed.
originally posted by: dawnstar
a reply to: OccamsRazor04
there's more saying there was something in the flynn case than says that there wasn't...
he resigned, he then retroactively filed with the Justice Department as a foreign agent.
manacort has recently also retroactively filed with the Justice Department as a foreign agent.
and as far as trump goes....
there's the mysterious trump hotel in Azerbaijan, you can't even find a way to get to the thing...
www.newyorker.com...
no, there's nothing whatsoever that can be found....
originally posted by: dawnstar
a reply to: allsee4eye
hey your the one who brought the bible into this...
and according to the bible, your first wife is your forever wife in most circumstances!!!
read your danged bible before you start bringing it up!
originally posted by: dawnstar
a reply to: OccamsRazor04
hillary might not have denied them but Kaine did!!
and no, I aint gonna point out which ones they were, I never even read them the first time.
but I do know that Kaine said that there were ones that pertained to him that weren't true!!
and, I believe him...
originally posted by: proteus33
a reply to: Pyle
its not bashing its calling them out for shameful conduct. they reported fraudulently and got caught doing it repeatedly. they lucky they only having to recant and not being sued or shuttered by fcc.