It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
When a Senator, like Susan Collins (R-Maine), says that she needs hundreds of millions of dollars to "fight" this epidemic in her state, what would she use the money for?
So Everett is suing Purdue Pharma, maker of the opioid pain medication OxyContin, in an unusual case that alleges the drugmaker knowingly allowed pills to be funneled into the black market and the city of about 108,000. Everett alleges the drugmaker did nothing to stop it and must pay for damages caused to the community.
Everett's lawsuit, now in federal court in Seattle, accuses Purdue Pharma of gross negligence and nuisance. The city seeks to hold the company accountable, the lawsuit alleges, for "supplying OxyContin to obviously suspicious pharmacies and physicians and enabling the illegal diversion of OxyContin into the black market" and into Everett, despite a company program to track suspicious flows.
Big pharma making a killing at this. This is where the war on drugs needs to focus.
"Everett sues OxyContin maker for allowing opioid to flood black market"
originally posted by: ThirdBlindMouse
a reply to: dreamingawake
Big pharma making a killing at this. This is where the war on drugs needs to focus.
"Everett sues OxyContin maker for allowing opioid to flood black market"
t must be really bad in some states, because Congress is preparing to add an additional $45 Billion...yes, BILLION dollars to the revised GOP healthcare bill for fighting this epidemic: nypost.com...
One more controversial point... opium production in Afghanistan, and elsewhere, places where US forces or allies are in control. Something to keep in mind... www.theguardian.com... I have 2 friends who are ex-Marines. Both of them have told me personal accounts of their tours in the Middle East, which confirmed for me we are not always over there just "hunting terrorists". I'll leave it at that and let you connect those dots.
originally posted by: FredT
So here are my thoughts for what its worth:
1) We should have NARCAN injectors much like an EPI Pen in easy to access areas much like AED's
2) Be you a liberal or a conservative we need to help these people. If you cannot care about the plight of some random junkie then put into perspective. They are clogging the already taxed health care system which is literally patched together
and has zero surge capacity to dealt with much that it already is.
This cannot be fought with NARCAN alone and we need to actually invest some money into helping these people which like anything is the only way to fight this epidemic everything else is a bandaid
originally posted by: ThirdBlindMouse
a reply to: carewemust
I don't think that addiction is a disease. It fits the disease model as much as a broken arm does.
Half the problem is enabling the junkies, telling them they have some kind of disease afflicting them, instead of telling them that sure, withdrawls gonna suck for about a week, but toughen up and you'll be over it in no time.
It's a lack of self control, no different than people who become alcoholics. It's not the substance itself thats to blame, it's the person who abuses the substance. No amount of treatment centers are going to help someone until they themselves want to stop the addiction. You make a good point with the ciggies. Do you think a four week stay in a treatment center would help you for that, or rather just a desire to quit, and the will to follow thru on that desire.
Throwing hundreds of millions of dollars at the situation won't help. Maybe some advertising on tv but other than that I'm not in favor of tax dollars being wasted on this.