NYT CORRECTS 17-intelligence Agency Russian hacking narrative to FOUR!

a reply to: Xcathdra

Bull. Mrs Clinton did no such thing. . Just say what ever comes into your head if it sounds good.huh?

a reply to: Sillyolme

so not only are you inattentive to what our members are saying here, but you also seem to forget oh-so-quickly.

let me help you with that.



Hillary Clinton blames high-up Russians for WikiLeaks releases

check the date on that article and YT link.

looks like it's time for you to **********RETRACT YOUR STATEMENT**********

LOL

a reply to: facedye

Don't be surprised if it takes 6 months to get your retraction, written in an obscure posting in a dead ATS thread.

a reply to: Krakatoa

man that was a good laugh. thank you.

Very disheartening thus was used as a major fact to support the Russia narative. Now it turns out it was false. Yet we are supposed to Still believe that the information is correct. How do you believe something once you know you were lied to??

As you look into it you you see coney was clueless he used a Russian memo only later to realize it was fake. And then we now know no FBI investigation was done on the DNC server. For what ever reason they would not allow the FBI access. Yet we are supposed to believe the hack as a fact according to FBI.

Hard to say what's going on but defiantly a lot of lies being told and not a lot of evidence left showing collusion

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
It only took them what 9 months to correct juked stats (to put it lightly) that we all knew about what a week after She got up at the debate claiming that malarkey.

Where's all the MSM bootlickers to go 'oh phffft the MSM always corrects their 'mistakes' and their lies they're just the best thing since since garlic bread'.

NINE months is BS.

I remember telling a few on this site - including one on this thread - that the '17 agencies' narrative was a lie, but they would not have it. They'd heard Hillary say it, they had heard CNN say it, so they were brainwashed into believing it. Not only that, they used it as proof for their argument.

It's just another example of how weak minded the people who push these kinds of lies are - and they don't seem to have any shame about being proven wrong time and time again.

Now the '17 agencies' fake news has been uncovered, it's time to say what the REAL headline is.

"Four agencies believe that Russia hacked the election and of the four, three of them think that it was probably in an effort to help Trump. At this point no one can say for sure". THAT is what the facts say, but it was spun into 100% proof by liars and propagandists ranging from Clinton, Podesta, Susan Rice, democrat senators, the left wing media and by a anti-Trumpers determined to spread the lies, including on this site (and on this thread).

originally posted by: facedye
a reply to: Sillyolme

so not only are you inattentive to what our members are saying here, but you also seem to forget oh-so-quickly.

let me help you with that.

Hillary Clinton blames high-up Russians for WikiLeaks releases

check the date on that article and YT link.

looks like it's time for you to **********RETRACT YOUR STATEMENT**********

LOL

No no no... James o'Keefe edited that video - Hillary didn't really say it... to actually prove she did, you are going to need to find some unnamed sources... a video of her actually saying it won't cut it.

originally posted by: dragonridr
Very disheartening thus was used as a major fact to support the Russia narative. Now it turns out it was false. Yet we are supposed to Still believe that the information is correct. How do you believe something once you know you were lied to??

As you look into it you you see coney was clueless he used a Russian memo only later to realize it was fake. And then we now know no FBI investigation was done on the DNC server. For what ever reason they would not allow the FBI access. Yet we are supposed to believe the hack as a fact according to FBI.

Hard to say what's going on but defiantly a lot of lies being told and not a lot of evidence left showing collusion

Yes the FBI were one of the four and didn't even have access to the server. The other 3, one of which was less confident in the conclusions, have not had access to the server either and have failed to provide even a reference to any credible evidence to support their conclusions.

We've even had Democrat Senators badger witnesses with this lie in open hearings. The fact this lie could be so widely pushed by a political party and their media lackeys is a huge scandal that the media will try to brush under the carpet and those that spread this lie will downplay.. don't expect an apology.

Looks like in addition to Hillary Clinton, Democrats and justice department officials in the obama administration, including Susan Rice ,lied by repeating the 17 agency bs.

Yah, hating Russia, preventing dialogue is SOP for warmongers. How can we fight endless war if we sit down to talk??

I'm wondering if anyone has pointed out that's because these are really the only spy agencies to make this kind of call. The treasury intelligence agency doesn't apply, neither does the NRO, on and on

originally posted by: theantediluvian
a reply to: Ares2493

The grasping at straws is so ridiculous. NYT corrects a line from an article and it's "the house of cards is falling!" and "the narrative is collapsing!"

Lmao.

All they did was correct a commonly expressed statement about the ODNI report from January. The DNI is the head of the 16-member USIC. Some people therefore wanted to (and still do) take the report to be the cumulative opinion of the 16 intelligence community agencies + the ODNI.

That really doesn't make much sense considering that agencies like the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency or Department of Energy really couldn't be expected to have an opinion.

What they really mean is that the report is drawn on the available analysis from relevant agencies in the USIC.

But hey, grasp away. I'm sure Mueller will send everyone home and discontinue the investigation into Russian meddling in our election first thing.

Now wait a minute.

With trump, you demand to exactly look at his language.

For example, you are outraged about his lie that Obama wiretapped him, when the truth is he it seems he just unmasked him and others.

Yet here, with months of every person on the msm, den politicians and even Ats members parroting this 17 agencies crap, you are willing to let it slide because it was close to the truth.

Seems like a double standard to me.

originally posted by: Ares2493


www.nytimes.com...

and then the correction all the way at the bottom:

Correction: June 29, 2017 A White House Memo article on Monday about President Trump’s deflections and denials about Russia referred incorrectly to the source of an intelligence assessment that said Russia orchestrated hacking attacks during last year’s presidential election. The assessment was made by four intelligence agencies — the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the Central Intelligence Agency, the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the National Security Agency. The assessment was not approved by all 17 organizations in the American intelligence community.

So the assessment went from 17 agencies down to the four most trustworthy under obama. The ODNI, NSA, CIA, FBI. Im sure it will go down even more as the investigation continues. Im sure a project veritas video is about to drop on the NYT tomorow.

In other words, they lied, again...

They need to be exposed.

Even this is misleading because the office of the DNI isn't an intelligence agency in the same sense that the others are. The DNI basically coordinates all the intelligence agencies. NYT can't do anything right.

On a side note, shocking I haven't seen a post from introvert on this thread...

a reply to: Sillyolme

Do you say whatever comes to your head without thinking? You should familiarize yourself with the woman you attempted to defend.