Trump goes bonkers. Tweets about Psycho Joe and Crazy Mika.

originally posted by: Stormdancer777

Too bad Joe was never brought to justice after killing his intern after he hit on her and she threatened to tell his ex-wife.

a reply to: UKTruth

so, show me where those right wing sources have insulted trump as much as they did obama???

Scarborough responded quickly to Trump's tweet with one of his own, writing, "Yet another lie. I have texts from your top aides and phone records. Also, those records show I haven't spoken with you in many months."
money.cnn.com/2017/06/30/media/national-enquirer-donald-trump-joe-scarborough/index.html

and it seems that there might be proof...
so, I guess time will tell.

originally posted by: Krazysh0t

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: UKTruth

I've seen people around here pretend like they are more credible than those sources so I see them as fair game. But here's some more:
Trump calls Obama 'worst president', 'a disaster' after 'unfit to serve' slam
5 Reasons Barack Obama Was — and Remains — Unfit for the Presidency
Obama unfit to serve

Nothing about his mental state or calling for his death in there.
Try again.

So what I have to give you a 1-to-1 situation or something? Puh-leaze! You know damn well you are just being obtuse.

You offered to 'help' someone who hadn't seen then MSM call Obama mental and call for his death and have now posted 5 links which do nothing of the sort. Not very helpful at all really.

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: alphabetaone
a reply to: UKTruth

Yep, I bought it, and yep I trust Joe Scarborough a whole helluva lot more than I trust President Trump.

You bought an accusation of a crazy conspiracy theory from a guy who has been bashing Trump for months - well done. At least we know for sure you lack even a shred of objectivity and rational thought.

Somewhere along the line I thought personal attacks were against the T&C?

a reply to: UKTruth

And I wasn't talking to you to begin with, so whatever. I don't care about your opinions anyways. Anyone who pretends like the right wing media didn't treat Obama the same if not worse than Trump is treated is delusional or lying.

originally posted by: dawnstar
a reply to: UKTruth

so, show me where those right wing sources have insulted trump as much as they did obama???

Scarborough responded quickly to Trump's tweet with one of his own, writing, "Yet another lie. I have texts from your top aides and phone records. Also, those records show I haven't spoken with you in many months."
money.cnn.com/2017/06/30/media/national-enquirer-donald-trump-joe-scarborough/index.html

and it seems that there might be proof...
so, I guess time will tell.

Tune in to Sheppard Smith on FOX on any week night you care to choose.

As for Joe Scarborough - if he can prove that Donald Trump was directing the NE to harass him then good for him... I will be the first to slate the President if it is true.
Proof means proof, not just that he was harassed by the NE (which they do to people all the time - they are a disgrace as bad as gawker). Proof is more than a phone log entry and the fact Trump knows the head honcho at NE.

If he CAN'T prove it, then he should be sued for slander and also fired from his job for dressing up his own speculation as fact on national TV.

originally posted by: alphabetaone

originally posted by: toolgal462
a reply to: alphabetaone

I've been following this thread and it was about the President's tweets regarding Mika "bleeding from a facelift" I didn't see anything until now about Trump targeting anyone's kids.

And your post doesn't make much sense either. Where is there any proof that Trump is targeting anyone's kids?

This is proof that people want to inject their opinions before reading (in this case watching) what others have posted before them.

Joe Scarborough said it in a video in this very thread 2 pages back found here.

Except the alleged NE rumor was NOT the subject of this thread. As you stated in the first place. And it's about as true as the Russia collusion BS I imagine....

The thing I don't understand is this, why can't Trump see that tweets like these are never going to help him. Trump is so easily trolled and triggered.
This is like infowars trolling NASA into responding on a claim that NASA has child slaves on mars. No matter the response from NASA it will be a clear victory for infowars.

How far can he take this before something is done? What kind of reputation damage is this causing the office of the president? the us government? USA as a country? Trump the brand?

originally posted by: alphabetaone

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: alphabetaone
a reply to: UKTruth

Yep, I bought it, and yep I trust Joe Scarborough a whole helluva lot more than I trust President Trump.

You bought an accusation of a crazy conspiracy theory from a guy who has been bashing Trump for months - well done. At least we know for sure you lack even a shred of objectivity and rational thought.

Somewhere along the line I thought personal attacks were against the T&C?

Grow a pair, that was hardly a personal attack. Although I'm sure you will say this is. The hypocrisy is thick around this here thread.

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: UKTruth

And I wasn't talking to you to begin with, so whatever. I don't care about your opinions anyways. Anyone who pretends like the right wing media didn't treat Obama the same if not worse than Trump is treated is delusional or lying.

I didn't say the RW media did not treat Obama poorly, but you made a specific claim of "helping" someone to see that the MSM had called Obama mentally unstable and called for his death. You then posted links to nothing of the sort.

originally posted by: toolgal462

originally posted by: alphabetaone

originally posted by: toolgal462
a reply to: alphabetaone

I've been following this thread and it was about the President's tweets regarding Mika "bleeding from a facelift" I didn't see anything until now about Trump targeting anyone's kids.

And your post doesn't make much sense either. Where is there any proof that Trump is targeting anyone's kids?

This is proof that people want to inject their opinions before reading (in this case watching) what others have posted before them.

Joe Scarborough said it in a video in this very thread 2 pages back found here.

Except the alleged NE rumor was NOT the subject of this thread. As you stated in the first place. And it's about as true as the Russia collusion BS I imagine....

It is part and parcel; according to Joe that this is the reason for Trump's backlash with his egregious tweet. Not that I have to explain what *I* consider relevant or not. Obviously the post didn't get removed for being off-topic, so your opinion means very little with regard to that. If you think it's off-topic, report it and let it go from there.

originally posted by: Jubei42
The thing I don't understand is this, why can't Trump see that tweets like these are never going to help him. Trump is so easily trolled and triggered.
This is like infowars trolling NASA into responding on a claim that NASA has child slaves on mars. No matter the response from NASA it will be a clear victory for infowars.

How far can he take this before something is done? What kind of reputation damage is this causing the office of the president? the us government? USA as a country? Trump the brand?

Sometimes I agree with what you are saying and then I think again and realize it's probably Trump doing the trolling.....And I personally believe he should be ignored when he tweets something dumb

originally posted by: alphabetaone

originally posted by: toolgal462

originally posted by: alphabetaone

originally posted by: toolgal462
a reply to: alphabetaone

I've been following this thread and it was about the President's tweets regarding Mika "bleeding from a facelift" I didn't see anything until now about Trump targeting anyone's kids.

And your post doesn't make much sense either. Where is there any proof that Trump is targeting anyone's kids?

This is proof that people want to inject their opinions before reading (in this case watching) what others have posted before them.

Joe Scarborough said it in a video in this very thread 2 pages back found here.

Except the alleged NE rumor was NOT the subject of this thread. As you stated in the first place. And it's about as true as the Russia collusion BS I imagine....

It is part and parcel; according to Joe that this is the reason for Trump's backlash with his egregious tweet. Not that I have to explain what *I* consider relevant or not. Obviously the post didn't get removed for being off-topic, so your opinion means very little with regard to that. If you think it's off-topic, report it and let it go from there.

What? The reason Trump tweeted is because he wanted to attack a person he had apparently just directed the NE to harass? Not making much sense - what was he after, getting his 'harassment' out in the open? lol.

originally posted by: alphabetaone

originally posted by: toolgal462

originally posted by: alphabetaone

originally posted by: toolgal462
a reply to: alphabetaone

I've been following this thread and it was about the President's tweets regarding Mika "bleeding from a facelift" I didn't see anything until now about Trump targeting anyone's kids.

And your post doesn't make much sense either. Where is there any proof that Trump is targeting anyone's kids?

This is proof that people want to inject their opinions before reading (in this case watching) what others have posted before them.

Joe Scarborough said it in a video in this very thread 2 pages back found here.

Except the alleged NE rumor was NOT the subject of this thread. As you stated in the first place. And it's about as true as the Russia collusion BS I imagine....

It is part and parcel; according to Joe that this is the reason for Trump's backlash with his egregious tweet. Not that I have to explain what *I* consider relevant or not. Obviously the post didn't get removed for being off-topic, so your opinion means very little with regard to that. If you think it's off-topic, report it and let it go from there.

I'm not the type to run and tell mommy someone is picking on me. Not since I was 5 yrs old anyway. And oh yeah, Joe S is full of #. Sorry, don't buy a single word of it, as he is a bully and typical of the lying bullies from MSNBC and CNN, they try and play the victim when they are the bullies.

a reply to: UKTruth

Nope. That's what Joe believed part of the reason was.

Personally, at this point, it seems like these tweets are a staged distraction from both sides.

a reply to: UnBreakable

You think he really did it?

originally posted by: Tempter
Personally, at this point, it seems like these tweets are a staged distraction from both sides.

Weird ain't it?

a reply to: Krazysh0t

So InfoWars is ok when it fits your answer? Ha...I was talking about CNN...or MSNBC...a MSM outlet. Nice try though. The media was fawning and would have done anything for O's change....and then he ran surveillance on them as the most transparent admin in history.

originally posted by: alphabetaone
Well, at the moment, this President is riding the boundary of legality, and if anyone knows how to do that, it would be Donald Trump. (though, collusion and obstruction noise aside, I think being part and parcel to extortion by way of aiding and abetting the targeting of someone elses kids has crossed that line).

ruh roh... just read about this one, Trump and WH aides?

18 U.S.C. § 872 - U.S. Code - Unannotated Title 18. Crimes and Criminal Procedure § 872. Extortion by officers or employees of the United States

Whoever, being an officer, or employee of the United States or any department or agency thereof, or representing himself to be or assuming to act as such, under color or pretense of office or employment commits or attempts an act of extortion, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both;  but if the amount so extorted or demanded does not exceed $1,000, he shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.