CNN Anchor: Trump Putting Journalists In Danger

Didn't ISIS murder a journalist or two? CNN is barking up the wrong tree...ignoring the REAL danger. Jerks!

a reply to: Pyle

And if Hiilary had won?

Can't forget her comments about making sure
Btietbart would get put down.

Mind you that Andrew Brietbart was indeed
in danger due to his journalism.

Let's not forget Michael Hastings....

If a journalist loses his job because he
does shoddy investigating, what's the loss?

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Pyle

And you are defending the media.

This is quite interesting.

You should be as well.

You know, 1st amendment, freedom of speech and all that jazz.

Bull.

The media isn't being censored, it's just being criticized.

a reply to: Pyle

We are saying that the President of the United States is making the Media to be the enemy. He isnt just critizing them he is signalling his supporters that they are always wrong and to fight them. This is a far cry from presidents of the past and resembles Nixon in his last few months.

Lying to the public when portrayed as news, does make them your enemy.

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Pyle

And you are defending the media.

This is quite interesting.

You should be as well.

You know, 1st amendment, freedom of speech and all that jazz.

Bull.

The media isn't being censored, it's just being criticized.

I did not say they were being censored. What I am saying is that they should be defended, whether we agree with them or not, in order to protect the 1st amendment.

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Pyle

And you are defending the media.

This is quite interesting.

You should be as well.

You know, 1st amendment, freedom of speech and all that jazz.

Bull.

The media isn't being censored, it's just being criticized.

I did not say they were being censored. What I am saying is that they should be defended, whether we agree with them or not, in order to protect the 1st amendment.

First amendment ends when the lies start.

a reply to: DBCowboy

The media isn't being censored, it's just being criticized.

The media has lost all standard of ethics. I don't mind if they disagree, sometimes people make good points, but when they lie as often and deliberate as they do, they are not being censored, they are being ignored.

a reply to: introvert

I did not say they were being censored. What I am saying is that they should be defended, whether we agree with them or not, in order to protect the 1st amendment.

Defend a lie? You can't defend a lie, it is a lie. The "News" should be begging for the mercy of the citizens of this nation for misleading and misinforming them when they can't handle the truth.

a reply to: introvert

No tort, libel and slander arent first amendnent rights. Thats what the medias done. And now theyre bitching about getting busted for it. Awww. They got to big for their britches and too comfortable being fake journalist and now they have to try or find another line of work.

But youre right how dare i criticize the stellar reporting of cnn.

originally posted by: Pyle

originally posted by: DBCowboy
I can't understand some of the people here.

Are you saying that people can't be critical of the media?

We are saying that the President of the United States is making the Media to be the enemy. He isnt just critizing them he is signalling his supporters that they are always wrong and to fight them. This is a far cry from presidents of the past and resembles Nixon in his last few months.

Trump is calling it as he sees it.

The "Trigger" effect has an enormous impact factor.

originally posted by: Pyle

From fanatics I am. Doesnt mean I agree with the media. I just hate dont think the president should be going after them the way he is.

Well thought out!

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Pyle

And you are defending the media.

This is quite interesting.

You should be as well.

You know, 1st amendment, freedom of speech and all that jazz.

Bull.

The media isn't being censored, it's just being criticized.

I did not say they were being censored. What I am saying is that they should be defended, whether we agree with them or not, in order to protect the 1st amendment.

Sure.

Always a good idea to defend known liars.

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Pyle

And you are defending the media.

This is quite interesting.

You should be as well.

You know, 1st amendment, freedom of speech and all that jazz.

Bull.

The media isn't being censored, it's just being criticized.

I did not say they were being censored. What I am saying is that they should be defended, whether we agree with them or not, in order to protect the 1st amendment.

Bull.

The media isn't some protected class.

They can be criticized by anyone.

a reply to: DBCowboy

It seems to only work one way in some peoples eyes, the media is given full free speech and the president must not say anything about it. hmmm, seems hypocritical.

I think CNN reporters will be safe they don't even leave the parking lot for live reports.

originally posted by: introvert


I did not say they were being censored. What I am saying is that they should be defended, whether we agree with them or not, in order to protect the 1st amendment.

The news media outlets should be operated
like any other for profit business, if no one buys their
garbage let them suffer the consequences!

They only have the freedoms they defend!

a reply to: xuenchen

This is rich, coming from CNN.
It's not like Trump is holding thier fake bloodied heads
in photo ops like crazed Kathy Griffin...

a reply to: xuenchen

Good , they should All Drop Dead ....... Really.........

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Pyle

And you are defending the media.

This is quite interesting.

You should be as well.

You know, 1st amendment, freedom of speech and all that jazz.

Bull.

The media isn't being censored, it's just being criticized.

I did not say they were being censored. What I am saying is that they should be defended, whether we agree with them or not, in order to protect the 1st amendment.

Bull.

The media isn't some protected class.

They can be criticized by anyone.

I did not say they were a protected class and I did not say they couldn't be criticized.

I was responding to your specific statement about defending the media. I think it's fine to defend the media, but we can still criticize and call out their lies. Especially if they are legaly crossing the lines of defamation and libel.

But I still think we should defend the 1st amendment, even when we disagree with how people us that right.

a reply to: introvert

I try to be a strong advocate for free expression, always.

That includes criticism. Criticism IS free speech.