It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
If the FBI thought it actually WAS a fraud, couldn't that be the reason?
originally posted by: mirageman
Even bringing a case of fraud against them would be difficult. Very few people were involved at all. What seems to maybe have been at play was they were being coerced into saying it was all a fraud for whatever reason the FBI had.
originally posted by: Arbitrageur
If the FBI thought it actually WAS a fraud, couldn't that be the reason?
originally posted by: mirageman
Even bringing a case of fraud against them would be difficult. Very few people were involved at all. What seems to maybe have been at play was they were being coerced into saying it was all a fraud for whatever reason the FBI had.
originally posted by: humanoidlord
a reply to: mirageman
nope, crisman was just an manchild trying to turn famous by grasping at straws
In 1979, the House Select Committee on Assassinations reported that forensic anthropologists had analyzed and compared the photographs of the "tramps" with those of Crisman, as well as with photographs of Watergate figures E. Howard Hunt, Frank Sturgis, and two other men.[4] According to the Committee, only Crisman resembled any of the tramps; but the same Committee determined that he was not in Dealey Plaza on the day of the assassination.[
originally posted by: charlyv
Yeah, the first 2 especially. Another anomaly that came out is they were arrested withing five minutes of the assassination, but other pictures of the tramps show longer shadows which made theorists suspect they were taken a few hours later.