Hillary Clinton to be prosecuted under RICO Act

originally posted by: AndyFromMichigan
a reply to: BlueAjah

Wait... That article is dated today?

How can Hillary and her aids still have access to classified info? Why would they still need it?

Exactly the questions Fox News should have asked themselves before running the story.

originally posted by: DJW001

originally posted by: AndyFromMichigan
a reply to: BlueAjah

Wait... That article is dated today?

How can Hillary and her aids still have access to classified info? Why would they still need it?

Exactly the questions Fox News should have asked themselves before running the story.

Hillary does still have security clearance.

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: DJW001

originally posted by: AndyFromMichigan
a reply to: BlueAjah

Wait... That article is dated today?

How can Hillary and her aids still have access to classified info? Why would they still need it?

Exactly the questions Fox News should have asked themselves before running the story.

Hillary does still have security clearance.

Do you think the OP is true or not?

a reply to: DJW001

You never sourced your claims when I previously requested.

Never mind.

originally posted by: raymundoko
a reply to: DJW001

You never sourced your claims when I previously requested.

Donald Trump has links to organized crime. The New York and New Jersey Attornies General must be watching him like hawks:

www.politifact.com...

a reply to: AndyFromMichigan

Secretaries of State are granted clearance for life in the event they ever need to be consulted on incidences that occurred while they were in office or or current situations.

Former Secretary Clinton is the only person in history to have held that position who was found to be "extremely careless" with the information and communications of her office. As a result the State department now has to determine whether or not she presents an ongoing threat to the security of any informatuon that might be shared with her.

a reply to: jadedANDcynical

OK. That makes sense. Thanks!

a reply to: DJW001

Do you have something from some kind of legitimate source other than an Op Ed writer's cliff notes of a book? Some type of investigation into Trump that proved illegal activity would be great. You do realize the media was out for his blood leading up to the election and could prove zero wrongdoing right? Some people were even offering huge sums of cash for "whistle blowers". You realize all NY real estate moguls have the same ties right? Bloomberg for example. After living in NYC for so long all I heard was how Bloomberg made his millions in bed with the Mafia. People to this day still believe that. The problem? It was all invented by rivals of Bloomberg based on normal business dealings in the construction industry, an industry saturated with mob ties no matter which city you are in. In the end, Bloomberg went on to win 3 terms (the 3rd highly suspect as he worked to change laws to allow him to serve another term) even though these baseless allegations dogged him. Why? Because there was zero proof that there was any legitimate link other than companies who had done work for him had some kind of ties to the mob/mafia.

I agree that you appear to fully believe what you say, no matter how misguided you may be. Let's focus on real issues concerning Trump instead of making a mockery of things.

originally posted by: DJW001

originally posted by: AndyFromMichigan
a reply to: BlueAjah

Wait... That article is dated today?

How can Hillary and her aids still have access to classified info? Why would they still need it?

Exactly the questions Fox News should have asked themselves before running the story.

That's one of the reasons Comey is no longer in charge of the FBI. Those incompetent criminals could still be wheeling and dealing information. At the expense of us all. If it was up to me. Hillary and co would never be allowed near important classified information again.

Hillary says that she was "too soft" on James Comey. Otherwise, she could have won the election!
www.foxnews.com...

originally posted by: carewemust
Hillary says that she was "too soft" on James Comey. Otherwise, she could have won the election!
www.foxnews.com...

At this point, it would be easier to make a list of the people Hillary has not blamed for costing her the election:

* Herself
* Chelsea
* The grandchildren.

originally posted by: AndyFromMichigan

originally posted by: carewemust
Hillary says that she was "too soft" on James Comey. Otherwise, she could have won the election!
www.foxnews.com...

At this point, it would be easier to make a list of the people Hillary has not blamed for costing her the election:

* Herself
* Chelsea
* The grandchildren.

Obama was on that list of "innocent" people before her "What Happened To Me!" book, LOL.

From the "source" Newstarget- Obliterating your Safe Spaces with Truth Bombs

"Sources within the Deep State"

Some folks love them some fake news when it matches their ideology, huh?

Nvm this is an old thread. It clearly isn't happening.

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
Nvm this is an old thread. It clearly isn't happening.

LOL ... indeed, good catch.