Hillary Clinton to be prosecuted under RICO Act

Damn you internet! Quit teasing us!

It can't come soon enough! Lock the beotch up!

Even if she is pardoned somewhere down the road, at least justice will have been done.

originally posted by: kurthall
a reply to: SBMcG



Really??? Jeff Sessions, is a joke. " I don't remember, I don't recall, I am not sure, maybe, its possible" .....LMAO....

Yes, because we all have photographic memory and can remember every single person we've ever talked to, and what we talked about, for years (or forever, which some of you seem to think is possible). I'm 100% certain I couldn't tell you what someone and I talked about at my last formal meeting (Jan 2017 - retired in Jan). And of course he's not going to say no, because then you'll claim he lied when he just couldn't remember every syllable of an 8 month old conversation (if there was even one of substance). Really wish ATS folks would traffic in more realistic thought processing...

originally posted by: kosmicjack
Damn you internet! Quit teasing us!

Oh c'mon! You love it...

You can always tell how bad Trump fans think he's doing by the number of "But Hillary" threads there are on forums like this one.

a reply to: Metallicus

Any "news" site who's other top stories include..

-"New Liberal Lunatic Conspiracy:.."
-"Why you love Capitalism and Hate big government"

and wait for it...

I cant possibly make this up...

"Globalists are building an army of millenials to destroy sovereignty"

Bogus article

Bogus thread

Fake News

Hoax Bin

Man.. now I see why you Trump supporters like saying that so much, It does feel good.

Anyway... The Clintons have done 1000x more good than harm to our country and all of us can only dream about making a positive impact anywhere near the size of theirs.

After reading the article.. they have nothing..

They have less on Hillary than they have on Trump and Russia

a reply to: 3NL1GHT3N3D1

Well...yeah.

Remember, assuming you're old enough to remember this story, this is a woman who couldn't finish a season in a fish processing plant because "she didn't like the way they did things!", or words to that effect. It was a salmon slime line, if I'm recalling correctly...it's actually the easiest job in a fish processing plant.

I worked the better part two decades in that very industry...that sentence, or words to that effect, translates very easily into "The work was too hard, and I didn't like being told to do things."

Having her do manual labor of that sort, even in jest, appeals to my vindictive nature.

I just read page 1. Getting late. Is this Hillary RICO prosecution REAL? There have been 3 threads about top Democrats being Investigated and/or Prosecuted this week. They load up on posts..fly high for a day...then sink into ATS never-never land.

a reply to: carewemust

I don't pay to play could get them locked up, but again, likely more fake news at this point.

originally posted by: EchoesInTime
Trump has been on a twitter rant today about the Clintons. If he wants an investigation into her/them why can't he just order the AG to investigate? He is the Prez, i don't know how it all works, but Trump definitely wants it to happen.

Distract! Deny! Tantrum! Anything to take the eye off his own impeachable crimes and misdemeanors! Such would only distract fools and other Trump cultists..

originally posted by: capncrunch88
a reply to: carewemust

I don't pay to play could get them locked up, but again, likely more fake news at this point.

Based on recent history you're probably right. Too bad...

But her time of reckoning is coming, eventually.

a reply to: Moresby

You can always tell how bad Trump fans think he's doing by the number of "But Hillary" threads there are on forums like this one.

Do you even bother to read the OPs before you post your BS?

This is about justice for We the People.

a reply to: Lucidparadox

Anyway... The Clintons have done 1000x more good than harm to our country and all of us can only dream about making a positive impact anywhere near the size of theirs. 

One can only assume you are being facetious. No sane human being would write that sentence except in jest.

Good God...you're delusional.

The source is suspect and I don;t think we can give it any more credence than CNN, WaPo, NYT.
I think this will just be a case of waiting to see how Sessions moves forward, but remember that Sessions has also recused himself from any investigation into Hillary Clinton, so he'll need to hand it off to Rosenstein - or he could appoint a Special Counsel.

We do know, though, that a world leader has accused Clinton of pressuring for a pay to play scheme, so I would hope somebody in Sessions team is looking into this.

a reply to: Metallicus

Why do you consider this web page to be reliable? Why do they use the phrase "deep state" instead of "Department of Justice?" Do you consider the language used by this "news" outlet to be objective? Do they have a track record of reliable reporting?

originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: Metallicus

Why do you consider this web page to be reliable? Why do they use the phrase "deep state" instead of "Department of Justice?" Do you consider the language used by this "news" outlet to be objective? Do they have a track record of reliable reporting?

If you had taken the time to read my OP and my follow up post on the first page you would see I have already conceded that I don't know if the source is any better or worse than CNN, WaPo or other mainstream media.

We already know the MSM lies from experience. This source probably isn't any less reliable than what already passes for news here on ATS.

Id like to see her in prisonas much as the next person, but do you have any idea what goes into prosecuting a RICO case? It takes YEARS of work, all of which is kept secret until an indictment is unsealed, so I call BS on this.

Then theres this too...

News Target

CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE

Sources in the Conspiracy-Pseudoscience category “may” publish unverifiable information that is “not always” supported by evidence. These sources “may” be untrustworthy for credible/verifiable information, therefore fact checking and further investigation is recommended on a per article basis when obtaining information from these sources. See all Conspiracy-Pseudoscience sources.

Factual Reporting: MIXED

Notes: News Target produces mostly right wing biased propaganda, but also publishes a good deal of unproven pseudosciences. The right wing conspiracy and pseudoscience website Natural News was formally News Target, which is now a separate website. Essentially, New Target publishes identical content as can be found on Natural News. They do publish some legitimate news, so beware when using them as a source.

Source: www.newstarget.com...

Source

a reply to: Metallicus

Lol. Come on man. Didn't we just see how our leaders really feel about each other? It kind of seems like, they only care about each other, and it doesn't matter what the people want.

a reply to: Metallicus

If you had taken the time to read my OP and my follow up post on the first page you would see I have already conceded that I don't know if the source is any better or worse than CNN, WaPo or other mainstream media.

If you had bothered to ask yourself the questions I just proposed, you would never have posted this [HOAX!] in the first place.

a reply to: Metallicus

Fake news.