It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: dianajune
originally posted by: Liquesence
So,
The article is entirely a "what if,"
Which includes as its source official North Korea State media "KCNA news service" about its supposed capabilities.
Then
There is absolutely no logical reason to sit around waiting for Kim to start WW3 when a simple attack can realistically remove NK entirely from the table of players willing and able to start that war
So...we should go to war...to prevent them from going to war because we think they can?
Let me put it to you this way:
Let's suppose you have a burglar in your house. He's taking all of your valuables. And then he wants to whack you.
But then he finds his firearm is empty and he starts to load it. What would you do - stop him before he finishes the job or just let him have at it?
"The advancements in the last six months have caused great concern to me and others, in the advancement of and demonstration of technology of ballistic missiles from North Korea.
"It is incumbent on us to assume that North Korea today can range the United States with an ICBM carrying a nuclear warhead."
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: SBMcG
My greatest fear about a (presumably) U.S./China attack on the Norks is that the fat little dwarf will choose to commit mass nuclear suicide rather than let the Chinese get their hands on his nukes.
I could see that scenario leading to the greatest single mass-casualty event in human history.
I get the feeling that is now unavoidable.
originally posted by: SBMcG
My greatest fear about a (presumably) U.S./China attack on the Norks is that the fat little dwarf will choose to commit mass nuclear suicide rather than let the Chinese get their hands on his nukes.
I could see that scenario leading to the greatest single mass-casualty event in human history.
originally posted by: schuyler
There is no such thing. South Korea would be instantly shelled and invaded by an army that is 1.2 million strong, not counting reserves. And these guys are not bumbling clueless Iraqis. They're called "near-peer" forces. You can't just take them out with an airstrike or two.
originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
How about we dont attack them, and then they wont launch on US?
US rejects China’s proposal to halt North Korea nuclear weapons
Washington has rejected China’s proposal that North Korea could halt its nuclear weapons programme if the United States and South Korea suspended military activities in the region.
originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
In 2015 only 41% of South Koreans even viewed Fat Little Boy Kim as their "enemy".
originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
Here goes the MO of the US: Classify little nations belligerent to puppet control as "enemies", troll them relentlessly in the media and with sanctions until they finally act, but if they dont then attack them first F it. And then we get into never ending war.