It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: TheRedneck
The following is my opinion as a member participating in this discussion.
a reply to: the owlbear
I use those when I feel there is a possibility that someone might mistake my opinion for staff action. I didn't think that was the case here. I also sign my posts with my title when making official staff posts.
But if it makes you feel better... here ya go.
TheRedneckAs an ATS Staff Member, I will not moderate in threads such as this where I have participated as a member.
Because President Trump just saved working Americans thousands of dollars apiece. We just shed part of the global shackles that are trying to bind us and destroy our independence.. The green business scam no thanks, the global corporations want to crush smaller businesses. Thank you Mr President.
originally posted by: avgguy
Why is it so bad he didn't sign it?
originally posted by: PsychicCroMag
Because President Trump just saved working Americans thousands of dollars apiece. We just shed part of the global shackles that are trying to bind us and destroy our independence.. The green business scam no thanks, the global corporations want to crush smaller businesses. Thank you Mr President.
originally posted by: avgguy
Why is it so bad he didn't sign it?
originally posted by: network dude
originally posted by: OtherSideOfTheCoin
Question:
I am watching the news just now and the governor of California has said he will enter into his own climate change negotiations with the international community in protest against Trumps climate change policies.
Is he actually aloud to do this?
If they can afford it, I suppose they can. But I am not sure they are in the black currently, so them joining might make them more of a liability than an asset. Time will tell.
originally posted by: angeldoll
Stephen Hawking
The UK's most renowned theoretical physicist and cosmologist is still using his exceptional mind to map a theory of how the universe works. But when it comes to matters here on Earth, Stephen Hawking is just as concerned about President Trump's science policies as anyone.
During a recent interview with Good Morning Britain, set to air Monday, Hawking bluntly laid out his views on U.S. administration's science policies.
"Climate change is one of the great dangers we face, and it's one we can prevent," said Hawking, according to the Guardian. "It affects America badly, so tackling it should win votes for his [Trump's] second term. God forbid."
www.aol.com...
originally posted by: TinfoilTP
originally posted by: IAMTAT
"I was elected to serve the interests of the citizens of Pittsburgh...NOT Paris."
- President Trump Rose Garden, 6/1/2017
Actions followed by statements like this are cementing another 4 years in stone.
originally posted by: FauxMulder
originally posted by: OtherSideOfTheCoin
originally posted by: ms898
a reply to: avgguy
It's a bad decision internationally because countries have lost faith with USAs word. If USA developes a reputation of not honouring promises why make a deal in the first place.
Apart from countries international businesses like stability.
So true even if you ignore the impact on the global climate, this sends a message to the world that America no longer stands by its international commitments.
F### the rest of the world if we have to suffer economically to make them happy. Why does every deal have to hurt the US? What good is a climate deal that lets China continue to grow their polluting ways for 13 years but puts tough economic killing restrictions on the US? Like I said F them.
The fact that in 2017 people are still saying "screw everyone else, keep all the money to ourselves" is utterly
disgusting.
Give to UNICEF, I don't want no more taxes.
The fact that in 2017 people are still saying "screw everyone else, keep all the money to ourselves" is utterly disgusting.
Continued US membership in the Paris Agreement on climate would be symbolic and have no effect on US emissions. Instead, it would reveal the weaknesses of the agreement, prevent new opportunities from emerging, and gift greater leverage to a recalcitrant administration