It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
According to Mahdi Darius Nazemroaya in a 2011 Global Research article, The Yinon Plan was a continuation of Britain’s colonial design in the Middle East:
“[The Yinon plan] is an Israeli strategic plan to ensure Israeli regional superiority. It insists and stipulates that Israel must reconfigure its geo-political environment through the balkanization of the surrounding Arab states into smaller and weaker states.
Israeli strategists viewed Iraq as their biggest strategic challenge from an Arab state. This is why Iraq was outlined as the centerpiece to the balkanization of the Middle East and the Arab World. In Iraq, on the basis of the concepts of the Yinon Plan, Israeli strategists have called for the division of Iraq into a Kurdish state and two Arab states, one for Shiite Muslims and the other for Sunni Muslims. The first step towards establishing this was a war between Iraq and Iran, which the Yinon Plan discusses.
The Atlantic, in 2008, and the U.S. military’s Armed Forces Journal, in 2006, both published widely circulated maps that closely followed the outline of the Yinon Plan. Aside from a divided Iraq, which the Biden Plan also calls for, the Yinon Plan calls for a divided Lebanon, Egypt, and Syria. The partitioning of Iran, Turkey, Somalia, and Pakistan also all fall into line with these views. The Yinon Plan also calls for dissolution in North Africa and forecasts it as starting from Egypt and then spilling over into Sudan, Libya, and the rest of the region.
Greater Israel” requires the breaking up of the existing Arab states into small states.
“The plan operates on two essential premises. To survive, Israel must 1) become an imperial regional power, and 2) must effect the division of the whole area into small states by the dissolution of all existing Arab states. Small here will depend on the ethnic or sectarian composition of each state. Consequently, the Zionist hope is that sectarian-based states become Israel’s satellites and, ironically, its source of moral legitimation… This is not a new idea, nor does it surface for the first time in Zionist strategic thinking. Indeed, fragmenting all Arab states into smaller units has been a recurrent theme.” (Yinon Plan, see below)
Viewed in this context, the war on Syria and Iraq is part of a process of Israeli territorial expansion.
What would be the motivation for England and France to follow the same plan?
originally posted by: Bluntone22
You say US foreign policy.
How does Europe fit into this policy?
What would be the motivation for England and France to follow the same plan?
originally posted by: DarkPalSFO
I agree with you 100%. Other then the oil and resources that are there.. the ultimate goal is greater Israel to become a reality. The US gets to reap all these natural resources and its war economy continues to thrive constantly.
originally posted by: dfnj2015
originally posted by: Bluntone22
You say US foreign policy.
How does Europe fit into this policy?
What would be the motivation for England and France to follow the same plan?
For the same reason the US are following the Yinon plan. Why is the United States executing the Yinon plan? Who knows.
originally posted by: SR1TX
This puzzle is put together with 4 Pieces.
What I want to know is what does "greater Israel" view as it's next essential step in assuring it's dominance and/or survival?
I think the war on terror will end once the US bombs Iran.
originally posted by: SR1TX
This puzzle is put together with 4 Pieces.
Saudi Arabia - Keeps Petro Dollar Alive
Israel - Owns the banking systems world wide
US - Powerful military
Allies - Along for the ride.
The rest does not matter. These variables fulfill the equation to just about every problem you see worldwide in present times.
originally posted by: Mousygretchen
a reply to: Willtell
I believe you. Was it deliberate or accidental?