Kim Dotcom's lawyers just sent a letter to special counsel Robert Mueller regarding Seth Rich

a reply to: Sillyolme

The problem isn't the content. The content is user generated, so it is only as good as the effort you put into it. The problem is one half of the political arena is so far up its own ass in partisan politics it can't see the real damage its own party is doing to the country. So unless you go frequent an echo chamber (which is what caused this mish-mash of reality and opinion in the first place) you aren't going to find much better luck elsewhere.

a reply to: drock905

God bless KimDotCom!!

It was so funny watching those that wish to believe the heinous one, known as Hillary, go nuts when Kim did not have immediate proof last week, it is as though they understand the intricacies that would surround getting real information out with the corrupt nature of American laws.

This shall be very interesting to follow, when all is said and done those guilty will be known, and a lot of liberals that I know are going to need some high priced psychoanalysis to help them as their cognitive dissonance breaks down and reality hits them in the face!

a reply to: drock905

Kim Dotcom Twitter

a reply to: Throes

And this crew doesn't see the cloud of thick black smoke pouring out the whitehouse Windows.
But here they see smoke.
Too funny.

a reply to: Krazysh0t

I won't give up regardless.

a reply to: Sillyolme

Just learn to pick and choose your battles. The conservative echo chamber are like hyenas. If you invite yourself to ridicule too often you'll get burnt out. But if you be patient and vet the information presented carefully you can skip silly stories or bait threads. That's what I do.

originally posted by: jaws1975
If this is true it's more than just the DNC in trouble, the intelligence community unmasked and leaked Seth's identity to them.

Wow, I hadn't even considered that! Thank goodness there is a special council, maybe.

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Sillyolme

The problem isn't the content. The content is user generated, so it is only as good as the effort you put into it. The problem is one half of the political arena is so far up its own ass in partisan politics it can't see the real damage its own party is doing to the country. So unless you go frequent an echo chamber (which is what caused this mish-mash of reality and opinion in the first place) you aren't going to find much better luck elsewhere.

So spot on! The true irony is that they just can't see it, all the while they pay lip service to it

I think its funny how people discredit him because he didn't release something when he said he would... Correct me if I am wrong, but when dealing with THIS kind of info, involving lawyers, etc there is no way to give an accurate timeline right? One must go through the proper legal channels before doing so, to cover their own ass and whomever else may be involved.

If anything it shows that his story is probably more legit than not. If he had just released something without going through the proper channels, then that would be suspicious.

originally posted by: iTruthSeeker
I think its funny how people discredit him because he didn't release something when he said he would... Correct me if I am wrong, but when dealing with THIS kind of info, involving lawyers, etc there is no way to give an accurate timeline right? One must go through the proper legal channels before doing so, to cover their own ass and whomever else may be involved.

If anything it shows that his story is probably more legit than not. If he had just released something without going through the proper channels, then that would be suspicious.

This is more in line with critical thinking than claiming "fake".

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: drock905

It was released publicly because it's false and this is the only way to get people to talk about it.
What good would a letter sent directly to special investigator Meuller do for the conspiracy theory crowd?
I mean if it just went from one point to the other without going the viral media route that would be rather boring wouldn't it? If you didn't know about it there's no story.
No ...it's public release is essential to the entire story.

If I knew anything that went against the DNC and Hillary, and I planned to give that information to ANY US government officials....
I would want it to be done in a wide open and fully public manner.

Reason: Fear. Fear of disappearing forever. Fear of dying in a plane crash or a heart attack on the way to testify.

For real.

a reply to: pale5218

If a true investigation is ongoing with Seth Rich (it should be provided his murder is unsolved), then they should be reviewing ALL incoming leads.

Dismissing a letter from someone claiming to have evidence ...?... that would be inexcusable to say the least.

Critical thinking has little to do with it, it's simply part of the process, and it's definitely not 'fake'.... as much as some would prefer it to be.

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Sillyolme

Just learn to pick and choose your battles. The conservative echo chamber are like hyenas. If you invite yourself to ridicule too often you'll get burnt out. But if you be patient and vet the information presented carefully you can skip silly stories or bait threads. That's what I do.

Patience is always called for in this sort of exposé. Substituting 'liberal' for 'conservative' in your comment does not invalidate it. The certainty of it being false, as postulated by retired [and claimed highly successful] Silly, is not a certainty. Her positions are perturbed by her intense dislike of conservatives so her ability to see more than one side of an argument is severely limited. As QED shows us, there are no certainties; only probabilities.
In this case, there are questions regarding the death of Seth Rich. The assertion that he was the source of the DNC leaks seems to be a more likely explanation than evil Russian hacks. Rich was said to be a Bernie supporter and leaked the documents when he saw the collusion of the Hilly coven to cheat Bernie and the Democratic voters. One would also have to consider if hackers could have gotten all the documents in the versions provided WikiLeaks. Determining such would require looking at the original documents and their email attached versions. Evidence of intrusion into the DNC system [the DNC are not too swift when it comes to security of any sort] does not mean that the documents published came from a source trying to hack or actually hacking the system.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: odinsway

That's a compliment coming from anyone n the right sweet thang..
That's how I know I'm correct. I get on here and NO ONE AGREES WITH ME!
Then I KNOW my thinking is right on track.
Hey smart guy. I've got a few milliion in the bank and retired at age 57 after selling a successful business that I built with my own two hands.
Where are you in compassion to me?
Minimum wage earner?

Did you mean comparison instead of compassion?

originally posted by: abago71

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: odinsway

That's a compliment coming from anyone n the right sweet thang..
That's how I know I'm correct. I get on here and NO ONE AGREES WITH ME!
Then I KNOW my thinking is right on track.
Hey smart guy. I've got a few milliion in the bank and retired at age 57 after selling a successful business that I built with my own two hands.
Where are you in compassion to me?
Minimum wage earner?

Did you mean comparison instead of compassion?

Yes. Kindle auto correct has a problem keeping up with my vocabulary. I'm always having to add words.
Had to add all the colloquial curse words popular to today's lexicon.
I'm adding words as I encounter the lack. Thanks. I missed that one.

a reply to: Lab4Us

You think so but you'd be what I call wrong.

a reply to: drock905

Lol don't be silly man. The Russians are coming....