Down syndrome woman blasts abortion genocide in UN speech, gets a standing ovation

originally posted by: Teikiatsu
* Abortion kills unborn children.

Abortion terminates *fetus* a *potential* life in that it cannot exist

without a host.

Aborting unborn children for non-medical reasons is murder.

A fetus is a potential child which hasn't a hope in hell of survival without

a host/mother. *No one can murder that which is unable to survive.*

a reply to: Teikiatsu

Aborting unborn children for non-medical reasons is murder.

So, what is murdering the unborn for medical reasons? Self defense? Then, if that's the case, I contend that all abortion are self defense against an unwanted intruder and thief.

Wait so I'm confused...
Is this a left or a right driven narrative?
The left is pro-abortion and this appears to be anti-abortion(to an extent).
But on the other hand...
She mentioned Nazi's within the first 5 seconds. Clearly a sign that some SJW foolery afoot.

Damn you leftists for creating such a complex oppression Olympics rules.
Can't even tell what side I'm trolling anymore...

, so we should only abort Healthy Babies okay got it

a reply to: Lysergic

Nice.

a reply to: eletheia

You are saying that the fetus or baby in the womb is not alive?

originally posted by: seasonal
a reply to: eletheia

You are saying that the fetus or baby in the womb is not alive?

The fetus is only alive because of the host/carrier .... It is breathing feeding

and developing entirely via her for 24 weeks.

a reply to: eletheia

Yes, a natural process.

originally posted by: seasonal
a reply to: eletheia

Yes, a natural process.

Natural too that its existence is entirely dependent on her .... If she dies

so does the fetus which is unable to survive independently without HER

till science comes up with something else.

a reply to: eletheia

Oh, so because of the fetus depending on another person (mom), it is a non issue to discontinue it's assisted living?

originally posted by: eletheia

In the bigger picture....There is another side to this argument ....


There a problem for every parent to be of any type of disabled/dependent

child, and that is ....

WHO WILL CARE FOR THEM WHEN I AM GONE

A family member with a severely autistic child, now a young man has decided that

when she knows her end is near, they will leave this earth together.

I am heart broken for her....but I do understand.

That's brutal.
I can't agree with it and thankfully don't understand.

It's a far more interesting question however and could be a really interesting discussion.

Unfortunately the pro lifers don't care about you once you're born so it would probably be a little one sided.

originally posted by: seasonal
a reply to: eletheia

Oh, so because of the fetus depending on another person (mom), it is a non issue to discontinue it's assisted living?

Now you're being obtuse .... its scientific fact that a 24 week fetus

does not survive without the mother/host however clever science

is, as yet they cannot transplant a fetus

a reply to: eletheia

Scientific facts are the reason then?

a reply to: seasonal

The sad thing is that countries where the abortion rate for Donw syndrome is up to near 100% talk about it as "curing" Down syndrome. They haven't "cured" anything.

originally posted by: Krahzeef_Ukhar

That's brutal.

NO thats *LOVE*

He is very loved..... can you imagine her torment in thinking of

leaving him to be uncared for neglected, maybe even cruelly treated,

and not understanding why and why she left him to that???

I can't agree with it and thankfully don't understand.

Just be grateful its not a decision that you have to make.

originally posted by: seasonal
a reply to: eletheia

Oh, so because of the fetus depending on another person (mom), it is a non issue to discontinue it's assisted living?

That's an interesting tangent to take.

Think about the elderly people who used to be completely independent, but now reside in assisted living communities and cannot really care for themselves any longer.

If we can callously sentence a child to death because it cannot care for itself so it's not independent, how long do we let that state go on? 1 year? 2? Children are not fully independent for years, and at what point do we decide that once independent adults are no longer worthy of assistance to live and so can be callously scrapped.

a reply to: eletheia

It's that torment I was referring to as brutal.
As I said, I thankfully don't understand.

I would probably put that clearly in the murder basket however.

originally posted by: seasonal
a reply to: blueman12

Nothing is wrong with wanting normal babies.

So you are ok with aborting Lefty babies? That trait someday soon will become predictable.

originally posted by: Krahzeef_Ukhar
a reply to: eletheia

It's that torment I was referring to as brutal.
As I said, I thankfully don't understand.

I would probably put that clearly in the murder basket however.

Have you ever seen elderly patients being treated without respect and left

in soiled garments, hungry, lonely, and uncomfortable unvisited,

It happens

a reply to: eletheia

Absolutely, the only time I ever seriously considered murder was for my grandfather.

But with his inability to consent I was considering murder and not euthanasia.