Proof that DNC manufactured the Russian controversy in June 2016

a reply to: D8Tee

The Metadata is certainly not made up construct by partisan hacks as initial knee-jerk reactions claim.

It withstands scrutiny as anyone can repeat the results using the source documents obtained from third parties.

In other words it's fitting scientific method of reporting results and inviting others to repeat those results.

Because those results are repeatable I'd say lots of veracity here compared to MSM take my and my anon sources word for it type reporting.

#1 casualty is DNC claim Russian interference, whole thing was made up by DNC itself.

Attack the messenger all you want but it doesn't change the data.

originally posted by: Pyle
I wouldnt Trust /r/the_donald ,AT ALL, EVER, FOR ANYTHING.

The thread hinges of the false claim that Guccifer 2.0 is a DNC insider and being the_donald they have to bring up Seth Rich since he is their big distraction story of the month.

I second this, they once posted a link that was blatently untrue (and later removed)
Anyone who questioned the post was blocked from the subreddit, which in itself spawned another subreddit
r/BannedFromThe_Donald/

It's nothing more than an ideological echo chamber filled with lowest denominator posters.

Just came across this YT vid looking into to unrelated but kind of connected bad stuff the deep state (swamp creatures) are trying to make us believe . I suggest the whole vid but you can skip to the 9:28 mark for just this thread

originally posted by: Taggart

originally posted by: Pyle
I wouldnt Trust /r/the_donald ,AT ALL, EVER, FOR ANYTHING.

The thread hinges of the false claim that Guccifer 2.0 is a DNC insider and being the_donald they have to bring up Seth Rich since he is their big distraction story of the month.

I second this, they once posted a link that was blatently untrue (and later removed)
Anyone who questioned the post was blocked from the subreddit, which in itself spawned another subreddit
r/BannedFromThe_Donald/

It's nothing more than an ideological echo chamber filled with lowest denominator posters.

That's horrible they sound like CNN, MSNBC, WaPo, ABC, NYT, Etc.

So ,who is Guisfer 2 or who might end up being Guisfer 2 ? inquiring minds would like to know ...watch the MSM because I think we might have moved 2 steps ahead of them

a reply to: D8Tee

Parts of your post is pretty much what William Binney was saying on TV last year.

It was a leak, not a hack.

originally posted by: Salander
a reply to: D8Tee

Parts of your post is pretty much what William Binney was saying on TV last year.

It was a leak, not a hack.

Seems to be the case. What came of the William Binney revelations, discredited and buried?

a reply to: D8Tee
It's all one: the Obama WH, the heads of the alphabet agencies under Obama, Team Hillary, DNC.
Same Hydra with many heads.
Obama WH requested unmasking, alphabet guys complied, names are shared with Team Hillary and the DNC and who the hell knows.

originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: D8Tee

Hillary Clinton Cannot Be Stopped Why her victory over Bernie Sanders is inevitable. - January 24, 2016 12:00 pm

For the second time in eight years, Hillary Clinton sees the Democratic nomination being pawed by a charming interloper, like a priceless vase grabbed by a panda. She’d prefer to shoot the panda, but that could mean breaking the vase, and onlookers would object. To make matters worse, Bernie Sanders, who leads Clinton in both New Hampshire and Iowa, has produced a new video ad, “America,” a wordless feel-hope montage that is awfully good, good enough that I can’t help feeling both moved by it and resentful that it works on me. Maybe shoot the panda.

Click for remainder of article...

The info above came from reddit.

That is the strangest article, I really didn't know what to make of it when I read it. Further down the rabbit hole...

a reply to: D8Tee

William Binney was correct, with the luxury of hindsight.


The truth is seldom convenient for MSM, so he's not on much anymore.

originally posted by: D8Tee
The2ofusr1 found a reddit post that appears to be smoking gun proof that the DNC manufactured the leaks and tried to make it look like the Russians.

Can some of you members put eyes on the post?

Sure looks like they are onto something to me, but I don't have a computer science degree either...

And this post will prove this beyond reasonable doubt with evidence. Not just that, but there is great circumstantial evidence of illegal activity going all the way up to the Obama administration, and provides new motive for why Seth Rich was murdered.
The evidence is presented in this post.

Bottom line:it is unimpeachable that watermarked Russian metadata in Guccifer’s first document drop are associated with a DNC tech worker named Warren Flood who otherwise has nothing to do with the DNC emails.Any media outlet reporting otherwise are probably either working from their own "corrected" copy from Guccifer or spinning hard or both.

Link

Well...this is certainly interesting. Metadata doesn't lie.

I really do wonder how deep this entire thing goes and if we will ever have a resolution.

The entirety of the DNC is in meltdown mode and I get the feeling they are really working hard at figuring out who they can tie into all of this that is high enough up in the DNC to take the fall and squash the narrative for the American public.

My guess is they are going to have to give up a pretty well known name and are working at manufacturing ties to everything.

Their Russian narrative has so far failed and they can't keep going with it or manufacture another media frenzy with another excuse. They are going to have to come clean but blame it on someone.

a reply to: Vasa Croe

That lawyer that attended the Seth Rich parents press conference several months back?
Is he telegraphing their next move on how they will try to spin this and make it Trumps fault?

Tweet

a reply to: D8Tee

They crossed that line that isn't supposed to be crossed,

I guess you were right.
I just clicked on the link to the HuffPost article....
It has been taken down.

originally posted by: D8Tee

originally posted by: Vector99
a reply to: D8Tee
gph.is...

How the hell do you add gifs?

I'm not sure that you can add animated gifs here?
It does work when you click the link.

a reply to: D8Tee

This is a very critical time in history, if the DNC escapes justice, they get to continue with their agenda of bringing censorship mainstream. Look at the tweet from Jack Burkman, they'd love nothing more than to be able to clamp down on the truth when it surfaces. They are finding it extremely difficult to battle us peons with computers, 4 channel and reddit are digging up the dirt on these guys faster than they can fill the hole. Jack Burkman and Brad Baumann were both with Seth Rich's parents at the press conference several months ago. I found it interesting that Seths Dad said Seth was shot with a Revolver since there were no shell casing at the crime scene, indicating it was not a professional hit.... A professional hit, you would not leave shell casings behind, so a revolver would be a better choice of weapons in reality.

Now I think it is time for mods to mark threads promoting Russian hacking of the DNC as hoaxes.

originally posted by: butcherguy
a reply to: D8Tee

They crossed that line that isn't supposed to be crossed,

I guess you were right.
I just clicked on the link to the HuffPost article....
It has been taken down.

I saved it, with the recent spate of censorship related to this matter, I figured it would get deleted.

Nobody can state categorically who killed Seth Rich.

However, Kim Dotcom isn’t part of any conspiracy theory.

He accurately predicted Julian Assange would publish material considered to be “Hillary Clinton’s worst nightmare” in a 2015 Bloomberg interview. Kim Dotcom’s words are forever archived in Bloomberg piece titled Kim Dotcom: Julian Assange Will Be Hillary Clinton’s Worst Nightmare in 2016.

Here is the Bloomberg video.

Would The Washington Post’s Dave Weigel accuse Bloomberg of being part of a Seth Rich conspiracy theory, simply because it interviewed Kim Dotcom years before the Russian hacking narrative?

Because I respect The Huffington Post, I’ll keep this piece short, and to the point; nobody is claiming anyone caused the death of Seth Rich.

On the other hand, more information on Seth Rich’s death is needed.

If indeed Seth Rich was the WikiLeaks source, we need to know, or at least evaluate added evidence. It’s unheard of to simply disregard new evidence, or prevent a witness from testifying under oath, even in “botched robbery” cases.

Here are the specific claims made by Kim Dotcom, found at Kim.com:

I KNOW THAT SETH RICH WASINVOLVED IN THE DNC LEAK.
I know this because in late 2014 a person contacted me about helping me to start a branch of the Internet Party in the United States. He called himself Panda. I now know that Panda was Seth Rich.
Panda advised me that he was working on voter analytics tools and other technologies that the Internet Party may find helpful.
I communicated with Panda on a number of topics including corruption and the influence of corporate money in politics.
“He wanted to change that from the inside.”
I was referring to what I knew when I did an interview with Bloomberg in New Zealand in May 2015. In that interview I hinted that Julian Assange and Wikileaks would release information about Hillary Clinton in the upcoming election.
The Rich family has reached out to me to ask that I be sensitive to their loss in my public comments. That request is entirely reasonable.
I have consulted with my lawyers. I accept that my full statement should be provided to the authorities and I am prepared to do that so that there can be a full investigation. My lawyers will speak with the authorities regarding the proper process.
If my evidence is required to be given in the United States I would be prepared to do so if appropriate arrangements are made. I would need a guarantee from Special Counsel Mueller, on behalf of the United States, of safe passage from New Zealand to the United States and back. In the coming days we will be communicating with the appropriate authorities to make the necessary arrangements. In the meantime, I will make no further comment.
Again, I’m not claiming anyone in particular killed Seth Rich.

What I’m saying is new evidence, or the possibility of new evidence is vital to finding out what happened to Seth Rich.

If you have a problem with this sentiment, yet eagerly await Louise Mensch’s latest breakthrough on hearsay about Trump, then you’re open to circumstantial evidence; just not on topics that don’t bolster your political bias.

In addition, Kim Dotcom isn’t willing to provide merely hearsay or circumstantial evidence, but has spoken to a legal team and is ready to testify under oath.

Why is this blasphemy to CNN and The Washington Post? What are they afraid of?

A true conspiracy theory is the belief that a botched robbery with little evidence surrounding the case should remain shrouded with questions, without any chance at further evidence.

America, and in my humble view anyone who wants more information on Seth Rich’s death, has nothing to lose and everything to gain from Kim Dotcom testifying in Congress under oath.

a reply to: D8Tee

This,

Link

The pertinent point is that: the metadata forensic proof is irrefutable that Warren Flood, or someone who owned a copy of Word registered to Warren Flood, shoehorned in obvious "Russian" fingerprints all over the documents.


Guccifer 2.0 is none other than a botched DNC creation to create a false flag for Russia.

Earlier in writeup says Flood worked for Biden office at pertinent timeframe.

a reply to: D8Tee

I saved it, with the recent spate of censorship related to this matter, I figured it would get deleted.

For future reference, use archive.is

That site saves the whole webpage for situations such as this.

originally posted by: Phoenix
a reply to: D8Tee

The Metadata is certainly not made up construct by partisan hacks as initial knee-jerk reactions claim.

It withstands scrutiny as anyone can repeat the results using the source documents obtained from third parties.

In other words it's fitting scientific method of reporting results and inviting others to repeat those results.

Because those results are repeatable I'd say lots of veracity here compared to MSM take my and my anon sources word for it type reporting.

#1 casualty is DNC claim Russian interference, whole thing was made up by DNC itself.

Attack the messenger all you want but it doesn't change the data.

Now, does this story go away since it will get no MSM coverage?

What happens next will be very interesting.

The more people that know of this the better.

This shouldn't be a partisan issue, anyone that cares about freedom and justice should wish to see this investigation notched up and pursued.

The DNC would like to censor social media, which liberals here support that?