It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: D8Tee
originally posted by: redhorse
originally posted by: D8Tee
a reply to: redhorse
How did you ever wind up with a religious nutter from California running for the Democrats in Montana?
The world has gone mad.
Rob Quist was born in Cut Bank. What are you talking about?
Ouch,, my mistake, I meant Republicans, sorry. Was a case of distracted typing. I was meaning to refer to Gianforte. I'm going to go back and edit Democrats to Republicans.
The account they gave is in direct conflict with the eyewitness testimony of the Fox news crew that were there. He committed assault. He's got a known hot temper and it came out at a critically inconvenient time.
originally posted by: redhorse
a reply to: YouSir
*sigh*
I'm a girl.
I'm pretty sure you don't know what a real man is though, so I'm about as close as you're going to get in your lifetime. So I guess I'll forgive the mistake.
originally posted by: YouSir
originally posted by: redhorse
a reply to: YouSir
*sigh*
I'm a girl.
I'm pretty sure you don't know what a real man is though, so I'm about as close as you're going to get in your lifetime. So I guess I'll forgive the mistake.
Ummm...that's what all the keyboard warriors say when they get busted using girly avatars...
BTW...I live out in the sticks...I always have...I prefer the country life...and I'm descended from the Tudors...small world huh...
YouSir
originally posted by: UKTruth
a reply to: WeRpeons
More importantly voters ignored this set up and the ever changing reporters story.
Great win for Gianforte.
originally posted by: AuranVector
originally posted by: UKTruth
a reply to: WeRpeons
More importantly voters ignored this set up and the ever changing reporters story.
Great win for Gianforte.
Thank God the Dems' scheme did NOT work. Or it was already too late for it to work.
The Democrats are complaining loudly. Now they're complaining about "early voting" and how it should be abolished.
We've dodged a bullet for the moment.
Eternal vigilance -- the Dems are determined to win "by ANY means necessary."
PS -- it seems I misspelled Gianforte's name in the OP. My bad. How did this happen? It's true I was in a hurry to post.
My apologies to all.
originally posted by: Wayfarer
a reply to: AuranVector
Dem's are determined to win, sure, but not by any means necessary. At some point we have to step back and realize that if we mimic the republicans in every underhanded aspect we become no better than the monsters we are fighting against.
RE: Gianforte Assault Charges
Do you believe assault is appropriate? What part of Gianforte's choke slamming a reporter is appropriate?
originally posted by: Masterjaden
a reply to: olaru12
HE wasn't a bully for Christ's sake. If ANYONE was a bully, it was the reporter shoving the microphone in Gianforte's face never expecting that he would defend himself.
Besides which, Gianforte's description of the events seems MUCH more likely. Having the microphone shoved in your face, going to shove it away, the reporter resisting, then pulling away and them then both going down together.
That seems MUCH more likely than the account that he just got tired of him and grabbed him and threw him to the ground..lol
Jaden
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: Masterjaden
Ah, yes. Let's turn this around to make the reporter look like the bully.
If this was a Leftist congressman, we'd be talking about how they are violent, terrorist fascists, but since it was a dumbass Republican, "he was being bullied".
I've learned a lot over the last few days on this site. The most important lesson being that many of you are dishonest hypocrites.
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: AuranVector
originally posted by: UKTruth
a reply to: WeRpeons
More importantly voters ignored this set up and the ever changing reporters story.
Great win for Gianforte.
Thank God the Dems' scheme did NOT work. Or it was already too late for it to work.
The Democrats are complaining loudly. Now they're complaining about "early voting" and how it should be abolished.
We've dodged a bullet for the moment.
Eternal vigilance -- the Dems are determined to win "by ANY means necessary."
PS -- it seems I misspelled Gianforte's name in the OP. My bad. How did this happen? It's true I was in a hurry to post.
My apologies to all.
They'll try to get rid of early voting in the states where it hurts them and keep it where it's beneficial, similar to how they only wanted recounts in the states they lost.
Vigilance is right, the Dem politicians are the sneakiest, most dishonest people on earth.
originally posted by: 0zzymand0s
a reply to: GraffikPleasure
Wrong. You left off Weiner, and the rest of these.
en.wikipedia.org...
Looks to be a fairly even split.
originally posted by: D8Tee
a reply to: AuranVector
Kicking that Guardian reporters ass will get him elected in Montana, it ain't Cali rules there man.