Trump Supporters Party on Maxine Waters Lawn!

originally posted by: seagull
a reply to: buster2010

What law did they break?

Peaceably protesting on a sidewalk isn't against any law I'm aware of...do enlighten me.

They were not on the sidewalk they were on her property. Watch the video and pay attention to the beginning of the video. You can clearly see they are off the sidewalk and on her walkway. That makes it trespassing.

a reply to: LadyGreenEyes

Sure they can, it just takes cognitive dissonance.

a reply to: burdman30ott6

Yep. I said it with a straight face, from my home, not from a FEMA camp where the Kenyan possibly bisexual secret Muslim didn't send me after inacting martial law so that he could stay in office for a third term while violent communist Alinskyites joined forces with #BLM to wipe out white men and impose sharia law on everyone else.

I know that a lot of Trump supporters have problems with their memories. For example, it seems like AG Sessions and Jared Kushner suffer from an identical ailment that results in an inability to remember meetings with Russian spy masters.

But some of us remember the 8 years of histrionics and hysterical whining from the Right under the last administration. We remember right-wing medpa and right-wingers bitching about his smoking, his chewing of gum, his selfie with that blonde, the "apology tour," how he let "political correctness" keep him from saying radical Islamic "evil losers." The bitching about his vacation expenses when flying to Hawaii — where he didn't hold court in his country club. The bitching about his golfing, talking smack about his children, incessantly demeaning the First Lady, etc etc etc.

Sharia law. Muslim Brotherhood takeover. FEMA camps. They're coming for the children. It's a gun grab. War on Christmas, open season on whites, open season on Christians, open season on men...OMG HOW CAN SHE USE THE FORCE SO GOOD BRO? FEMINAZI PROPAGANDA! (and she kissed a black guy!)

Can you imagine if Obama had gone to have some meeting with 50 Muslim leaders? Holy s#. It would have been the armed revolt wingnuts yammered about for 8 years.

Let's not pretend that the left is disproportionately peopled with petty drama queens by comparison.

originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
a reply to: LadyGreenEyes

But boy are they taking up a lot of sidewalk space, other people need to walk too you know!

Nitpicking about someone else's decision to leave their own graduation ceremony is about on par with my argument about sidewalk space.

Where in the video do you see anyone unable to pass? These people were very peaceful, and would certainly have allowed anyone to pass who came along.

No, not the same at all. A ceremony for graduation isn't a protest on a public sidewalk.

a reply to: theantediluvian

You summed up the politics, my entire time on ATS thus far.

LOL

originally posted by: daskakik
a reply to: LadyGreenEyes

Sure they can, it just takes cognitive dissonance.

You mean like claims that one can disagree, then can't disagree??

Oh, the irony!!!

a reply to: theantediluvian

Good thing enough people spoke up to stop all that !!

originally posted by: LadyGreenEyes
You mean like claims that one can disagree, then can't disagree??

Oh, the irony!!!

Actually I have been saying the same thing over and over, you can disagree but if you do you can't also claim that you support a persons right to do whatever it is they are doing.

a reply to: theantediluvian

Well, Obama just embraced Taqiya to go against his nature while in the White House, allowing most of those plans of his to not come to pass. It's a clever ruse to lull America into a trustful sleep... in 30 years when Sasha or Malia run, watch out! Then we'll see why his presidency didn't fulfill the FEMA camps and sharia law. We must remain vigilant.

a reply to: LadyGreenEyes

So what exactly will this protest accomplish? Absolutely nothing, they are wasting their time. Wasn't that one of the main issues Trump supporters had with the protests against him? That they were wasting their time? And weren't Trump supporters questioning what they were trying to accomplish?

Now that the shoe is on the other foot Trump supporters seem to have completely forgotten their own logic when it comes to what is worth protesting.

To quote you:

Oh, the irony!!!

The hypocrisy goes both ways and Trump supporters are just as big of hypocrites as die-hard liberals.

a reply to: 3NL1GHT3N3D1

I like how you said "die-hard" liberals to try and exclude the people in this thread.

So what, regular liberals aren't hypocrites?

Ha... Ha.. ha..

a reply to: Granite

He'd be a good candidate for 2020.

1. Anti-establishment - check.
2. Calls out dodgy republicans - check.
3. Calls out dodgy democrats - check.
4. Wants peace and a happy community - check.

Pretty much anyone who runs on those platforms would be a preferred candidate to current choices who are establishment hacks obsessed with keeping communities divided.

a reply to: knowledgehunter0986

Excuse me, die-hard Trump supporters are just as hypocritical as die-hard liberals. I know there are people who support Trump yet don't make excuses for him just as I know there are Trump haters who will make every excuse not to recognize what he's done that is good.

Is that a little more fair for your liking?

Also, didn't you say you were a liberal in another thread recently? Self-hate is never a good thing you know.

a reply to: 3NL1GHT3N3D1

Yes I'm liberal. The point I was trying to make is that to be truly fair, you don't categorize hypocrites.

Anyone can exhibit hypocrisy, it's not only die-hard libs or Trump supporters.

Who was hating on anyone?

a reply to: knowledgehunter0986

Yet categorizing hypocrites is all that ever happens around here nowadays.

And yes, I do agree all walks of life have their hypocrites but the topic is Trump supporters protesting in front of a liberal politician's house.

a reply to: burdman30ott6

Taqiya is only for legal proceedings and only in defense of ones life.

a reply to: 3NL1GHT3N3D1

I don't see the hypocrisy or the double standard you keep mentioning.

2 totally different scenarios.

We all agreed that everyone was well within their rights, and that's where the similarities end.

originally posted by: Sublimecraft
a reply to: Granite

He'd be a good candidate for 2020.

1. Anti-establishment - check.
2. Calls out dodgy republicans - check.
3. Calls out dodgy democrats - check.
4. Wants peace and a happy community - check.

Pretty much anyone who runs on those platforms would be a preferred candidate to current choices who are establishment hacks obsessed with keeping communities divided.

Precisely...

That same thought came up to me also, but didn't won't any hiper attention on him before his is ready to run.
Eliminating the deep state as much as possible prior to 2020 would help him immencely.

a reply to: Granite

I am all for getting rid of Maxine Waters but Omar Navarro does not seem to be that intelligent

originally posted by: Ripper777
a reply to: Granite

I am all for getting rid of Maxine Waters but Omar Navarro does not seem to be that intelligent

Worked for Trump. He can't pour piss out of a boot without reading the instructions on the heel but he became president.