DNA Analysis Of Paracas Skulls, Shows Interesting Results

Brien Foerster has released preliminary information regarding these skulls.
"Whatever the sample labeled 3A has came from – it had mtDNA with mutations unknown in any human, primate or animal known so far. The data is very sketchy though and a LOT of sequencing still needs to be done to recover the complete mtDNA sequence. But a few fragments I was able to sequence from this sample 3A indicate that if these mutations will hold we are dealing with a new human-like creature, very distant from Homo sapiens, Neanderthals and Denisovans."

undergroundscience.net...

originally posted by: BullwinkleKicksButt
Brien Foerster has released preliminary information regarding these skulls.
"Whatever the sample labeled 3A has came from – it had mtDNA with mutations unknown in any human, primate or animal known so far. The data is very sketchy though and a LOT of sequencing still needs to be done to recover the complete mtDNA sequence. But a few fragments I was able to sequence from this sample 3A indicate that if these mutations will hold we are dealing with a new human-like creature, very distant from Homo sapiens, Neanderthals and Denisovans."

undergroundscience.net...

Very interesting. Is it a funding problem as to why these folks didn't go full bore on the tests?

originally posted by: The3murph

originally posted by: BullwinkleKicksButt
Brien Foerster has released preliminary information regarding these skulls.
"Whatever the sample labeled 3A has came from – it had mtDNA with mutations unknown in any human, primate or animal known so far. The data is very sketchy though and a LOT of sequencing still needs to be done to recover the complete mtDNA sequence. But a few fragments I was able to sequence from this sample 3A indicate that if these mutations will hold we are dealing with a new human-like creature, very distant from Homo sapiens, Neanderthals and Denisovans."

undergroundscience.net...

Very interesting. Is it a funding problem as to why these folks didn't go full bore on the tests?

I have never really dedicated the time on this to know much about it.
It was really just by chance that I discovered this report.
I will start to look at it with greater interest now.

originally posted by: The3murph

originally posted by: BullwinkleKicksButt
Brien Foerster has released preliminary information regarding these skulls.
"Whatever the sample labeled 3A has came from – it had mtDNA with mutations unknown in any human, primate or animal known so far. The data is very sketchy though and a LOT of sequencing still needs to be done to recover the complete mtDNA sequence. But a few fragments I was able to sequence from this sample 3A indicate that if these mutations will hold we are dealing with a new human-like creature, very distant from Homo sapiens, Neanderthals and Denisovans."

undergroundscience.net...

Very interesting. Is it a funding problem as to why these folks didn't go full bore on the tests?

They are trying to reconstruct the mtDNA (mitochondrial DNA that is passed down by mothers). It might be that they
don't have a complete sequence. When DNA degrades due to age, it falls apart into millions of short strands, and so they have to use PCR to duplicate what DNA strands exist, then sort them by length, then try and match up all the millions of different sequences to form a single consistant sequence. That isn't helped due to every individual having different random mutations.

There are humans walking around with elongated skulls:

www.alamy.com...

Is it so hard to believe that there was another race of human like beings that was separated from the other groups for a long time and evolved differently? No, they are just different kinds of people. How long ago did they break off should be the question.

But, unless they can get that DNA fully done, there will always be people who deny these beings as head bound people. People are parrots, monkey see monkey do. These people must have impressed the early people so much that they bound their kids heads to make them appear as these other human like creatures. Maybe they taught us lots of things back many thousands of years ago. I would tend to believe they were good people if people started trying to make their kids look like them.

I think that this group of skulls should be investigated correctly instead of being discounted by so many professionals. What is the difference if there was another group of beings, I still do not think this proves that these beings were Nephilim though. Those giant beings could have just been some people with giantism genetics that worked correctly.

a reply to: BullwinkleKicksButt

What is shocking to me is that a cursory examination of these skulls shows them not to be human given the facts as stated in the article: volume, number of plates, etc.. This has been known for a long time and yet main stream science has never found the need to investigate. Why is that? This is one of those cases that may not be a conspiracy to deny us our true heritage, but they do their best to make it look that way.

a reply to: BullwinkleKicksButt

Imagine if we found out that the mutations were actually modifications - deliberate modifications unable to be repeated in nature. That'd be quite X-filey wouldn't it?

originally posted by: TobyFlenderson
a reply to: BullwinkleKicksButt

What is shocking to me is that a cursory examination of these skulls shows them not to be human given the facts as stated in the article: volume, number of plates, etc.. This has been known for a long time and yet main stream science has never found the need to investigate. Why is that? This is one of those cases that may not be a conspiracy to deny us our true heritage, but they do their best to make it look that way.

To me, it would be great if the scientific group that investigates this science would actually take one of these and have it properly tested and have the DNA checked out to see if it is a regular mutated population or a separate hominiod. Instead, they look at them with a closed mind saying they are banded skulls and discount them as fakes without even investigating them. Then they try to discredit anyone who begs to differ in their beliefs. Now they would lose face if they were found out wrong I suppose so they will keep denying them even if they are proved to be a real different race of beings. What is wrong with our Science today, it is discounting anything that does not follow concensus of the time.

Maybe they are mutations caused by eating too much avacado which tears apart DNA and could lead to some problems with mutations. Or maybe their water supply contained a lot of arsenic which is a strong mutagen.

originally posted by: TobyFlenderson
a reply to: BullwinkleKicksButt

What is shocking to me is that a cursory examination of these skulls shows them not to be human given the facts as stated in the article: volume, number of plates, etc.. This has been known for a long time and yet main stream science has never found the need to investigate. Why is that? This is one of those cases that may not be a conspiracy to deny us our true heritage, but they do their best to make it look that way.

And if that trail of scientific-backed evidence points to the early tales of UFOs and Oannes, etc., being true?
There is every reason in the world for authorities across several disciplines to deny, deny, and deny that we have been or are being visited by ETs.

a reply to: Sublimecraft

That would certainly get people's attention.

The question is.. would we even know how to translate the data if alien...
We only have earth stuff to compare with..
And what if these aliens are made of the same stuff as us, we would just think it was a earthling

a reply to: BullwinkleKicksButt


Not considered scientific but the Maya have it in there history of the earth that there were at least 3 other types of "men" on the earth at different times. The earth today has the "Adam" man who unlike the others was given a god nature, made after the image which means much more that simply "image". Refers to intellect and spirituality ect unlike the earlier 3 attempts. Phrase used to describe the early three as "could not recognize the Creator".....apparently until with "Adam" God made a man with God nature.

Nothing to see here, Now leave...
we have seized all the evidence and destroyer it.
um I mean they are fake and dont Have any evidence.

originally posted by: Sublimecraft
a reply to: BullwinkleKicksButt

Imagine if we found out that the mutations were actually modifications - deliberate modifications unable to be repeated in nature. That'd be quite X-filey wouldn't it?

They get to the end of the genetic sequence and find patent number...

I've been hearing for years about this, the Starchild skull, etc. Would be nice for adequate testing to settle it once and for all.

originally posted by: TobyFlenderson
a reply to: BullwinkleKicksButt

What is shocking to me is that a cursory examination of these skulls shows them not to be human given the facts as stated in the article: volume, number of plates, etc.. This has been known for a long time and yet main stream science has never found the need to investigate. Why is that?

Several reasons.

First, the cranial volume is well inside the range of human crania.

Second, the plates are fused, which is not an uncommon occurrence.

Third, the skulls weren't found by themselves. The skeletons are perfectly human too.

What then should mainstream science address?

Harte

originally posted by: Aliensun

originally posted by: TobyFlenderson
a reply to: BullwinkleKicksButt

What is shocking to me is that a cursory examination of these skulls shows them not to be human given the facts as stated in the article: volume, number of plates, etc.. This has been known for a long time and yet main stream science has never found the need to investigate. Why is that? This is one of those cases that may not be a conspiracy to deny us our true heritage, but they do their best to make it look that way.

And if that trail of scientific-backed evidence points to the early tales of UFOs and Oannes, etc., being true?
There is every reason in the world for authorities across several disciplines to deny, deny, and deny that we have been or are being visited by ETs.

Oannes was Adapa, and was a human being, not some mutated Sumerian, nor was he a hybrid.
That's straight from the ancient text.

Harte

originally posted by: Harte

originally posted by: TobyFlenderson
a reply to: BullwinkleKicksButt

What is shocking to me is that a cursory examination of these skulls shows them not to be human given the facts as stated in the article: volume, number of plates, etc.. This has been known for a long time and yet main stream science has never found the need to investigate. Why is that?

Several reasons.

First, the cranial volume is well inside the range of human crania.

Second, the plates are fused, which is not an uncommon occurrence.

Third, the skulls weren't found by themselves. The skeletons are perfectly human too.

What then should mainstream science address?

Harte

The tricorder found at the dig site. Or was it a phazer?

a reply to: BullwinkleKicksButt

Can you please link the article written by the scientists, where we can actually see their names, where they conducted their research and their findings?

Your link is to an unreliable site that has on its first page an article saying Marilyn Monroe was killed because she knew about aliens...... lol

originally posted by: Agartha
a reply to: BullwinkleKicksButt

Your link is to an unreliable site that has on its first page an article saying Marilyn Monroe was killed because she knew about aliens...... lol

Would it have been more reliable if it was msm? Cause even msm covered that story.
Lol back at ya.
Hahhaha