It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: dreamingawake
originally posted by: rickymouse
I got thistles in my yard, they grow wild out back. They are an excellent medicine. so are dandelions. If the other farmers around there are using roundup, what is the problem? I chop my thistle down before it goes to seed, but always let a few survive, it never hurts to have a little thistle around the house for an emergency, a little yarrow is good too..
I agree with the thistle comments. However, spaying the Roundup there poses to contaminate their crops. With that they will loose their organic certification.
originally posted by: aliensanonymous
a reply to: rickymouse
Vinegar neat and or non bio-hazardous detergant as surfactant, with salt or essential oil added extra is effective on topical and broad leaf weeds. But deep rooting vines ivy, morning glory or ribosomal spreading weeds are a diffrent story.
I have used Glyphosate commercially opon clients request, but loath it, I would avoid using it own my own land. I have witnessed it stripping all life from soil for extended peroids not even a sign of ants, even causing erosion to sandy banks with prolounged application.
National Pestcides Research Centre
Has some intreasting points on soil-half life, mammalian toxicity, even suicide via Glyphosate poisoning.
No point in mentioning how corrupt Bayer/Monsatan is, and all the listed adverse effects stated online!
No.
I have used roundup a couple of times. It actually rejuvinates when you add fertilizer containing phosphate. I heard that years ago already from someone who owned a farm and had went to a seminar on it. I checked it out and it appears to be true, but that information was hard to find. Exact wording was required.
originally posted by: D8Tee
a reply to: rickymouse
No.
I have used roundup a couple of times. It actually rejuvinates when you add fertilizer containing phosphate. I heard that years ago already from someone who owned a farm and had went to a seminar on it. I checked it out and it appears to be true, but that information was hard to find. Exact wording was required.
- Morning glory weeds in the garden can be viewed as a nemesis due to the rapid spread and ability to take over garden areas. ... Morning glory weed control in the cultivated landscape, however, is essential to prevent the plant from taking over. ... The bindweed plants grow from rhizomes ...
We used it for 20 years to burn off weeds in the fall and spring before seeding, thats why.
So why do you say no?
originally posted by: markosity1973
a reply to: aliensanonymous
I do agree with you though that the market garden practise of using it in low concentrations via irrigation with gmo 'round up resistant' plants is over the line though.
originally posted by: D8Tee
a reply to: rickymouse
We used it for 20 years to burn off weeds in the fall and spring before seeding, thats why.
So why do you say no?
We had 1920 acres that were rotated between wheat, lentils, barley, oats, canola fall rye and field peas.
btw, we also had a very large garden for home use, and we never used any herbicides for that, we use a hoe.
Source please, as I see evidence to the contrary from Canadian guv.
With potatoes, they often add phosphate fertilizer in the field mid summer. That reactivates the roundup for a period of time and negatively effects the potato plant and lowers the amount of potatoes produced. The Department of agriculture does not recommend using roundup for potatoes anymore, there are a couple of other ones they recommend, one which isn't very good for male fertility.
I'm totally against this practice and think it should be taken off label.
The preharvest treatments of grains happening now required the government to raise the level of glyphosate residue in grains.
Nope. Not true.
All the grains now are recommended to have preharvest treatment to be sold to many of these big graineries.
originally posted by: D8Tee
a reply to: rickymouse
I'm totally against this practice and think it should be taken off label.
The preharvest treatments of grains happening now required the government to raise the level of glyphosate residue in grains.
I made a thread a few weeks back.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
Nope. Not true.
All the grains now are recommended to have preharvest treatment to be sold to many of these big graineries.
There is certainly no such mandate for this in Canada. I am hesitant to believe that any grain handling company would require this. It sounds like disinformation if you ask me. Yes we owned our own combine.
I did not say all the graineries. In North Dakota, they have a state run program and the commercial graineries there supposedly are required to have this treatment. Some in Minnesota require this too. I just checked those two states because they are big producers.
“Glyphosate is a systemic product, which means that once it enters the plant it will get into the circulation system and move through the plant to the same places that the sugars are going, which are called sinks,” says Brenzil. “The sink at the pre-harvest timing is the seed. So basically what you are doing by applying early is taking what is applied to the surface of the leaf and putting it right into the seed.”