TR-3B Patent!

originally posted by: iTruthSeeker

originally posted by: moebius
a reply to: sled735

Too bad that there is zero evidence that Ben Rich made any statements just 10 days before his death.

But that doesn't stop tinfoil-hatters from making # up I guess.

If it weren't for so called "tinfoil hatters" this site would not exist...

Good one!

originally posted by: BASSPLYR
a reply to: sled735

Second vid the one in france is a known cgi

Thanks. Deleted.

originally posted by: sled735

originally posted by: iTruthSeeker

originally posted by: moebius
a reply to: sled735

Too bad that there is zero evidence that Ben Rich made any statements just 10 days before his death.

But that doesn't stop tinfoil-hatters from making # up I guess.

If it weren't for so called "tinfoil hatters" this site would not exist...

Good one!

It's true! The basis of this site (I thought) was to talk about stuff such as this op (S+F), but some people get weird and bitchy when anything about it is brought up.

originally posted by: iTruthSeeker

originally posted by: sled735

originally posted by: iTruthSeeker

originally posted by: moebius
a reply to: sled735

Too bad that there is zero evidence that Ben Rich made any statements just 10 days before his death.

But that doesn't stop tinfoil-hatters from making # up I guess.

If it weren't for so called "tinfoil hatters" this site would not exist...

Good one!

It's true! The basis of this site (I thought) was to talk about stuff such as this op (S+F), but some people get weird and bitchy when anything about it is brought up.

(For clarification)

That's what I always thought too.

a reply to: sled735

This is from CNN which many would consider not very reliable about anything unless it is pushing it's socialist communist agenda or attacking anyone but the Clinton/Obama machine.
ireport.cnn.com...

The TR-3B is Code named Astra. The tactical reconnaissance TR-3B first operational flight was in the early 90s. The triangular shaped nuclear powered aerospace platform was developed under the Top Secret, Aurora Program with SDI and black budget monies. At least 3 of the billion dollar plus TR-3Bs were flying by 1994. The Aurora is the most classified aerospace development program in existence. The TR-3B is the most exotic vehicle created by the Aurora Program. It is funded and operationally tasked by the National Reconnaissance Office, the NSA, and the CIA. The TR-3B flying triangle is not fiction and was built with technology available in the mid 80s. Not every UFO spotted is one of theirs.

Supposedly it has a nuclear reactor that powers its' subsystems. Hummm hope one does not crash..collateral damage for national security anyone?

The article is long but for those who "WANT TO BELIEVE" it has everything you might want to know about the TR3B.

With the vehicle mass reduced by 89%, the craft can travel at Mach 9, vertically or horizontally. My sources say the performance is limited only the stresses that the human pilots can endure. Which is a lot, really, considering along with the 89% reduction in mass, the G forces are also reduced by 89%.

First, it's not CNN, it's ireport. Like Before It's News anyone can post anything there.

Second, ASTRA is Airborne Surveillance and TRAcking. It's not an aircraft type, it was a program, reportedly run by Boeing.

Third, Aurora was classified funding for the B-2 program. Ben Rich confirmed this several times.

a reply to: 727Sky

Thank you 727Sky.

I appreciate any new information, even if it is from CNN.

Well, as I see it, there's no telling for sure what "we" have up there in the sky. After all, the B-2 and F-117 were both revealed to the masses in 1988, almost 30 years ago. So, what exactly have all those thousands of Black Program airplane making folks been doing for the past three decades?

a reply to: SonofaSkunk

That's what drives me nuts. We know of a number of black programs through word of mouth. Not more than a vague hint of one or two have made it on to the net. And those are conventional aircraft. But now, we have this triangle, that laughs at the laws of physics, that we supposedly know almost everything about. What, did the DIA fall asleep, let the information out and just go "eh, forget it, it's already out there"?

originally posted by: TheScale

[post]to Violator1: if you happen to come to this thread please repost what u had in your thread that was closed by the mods for whatever reason. i feel like u had plenty of information not in this thread for it to warrant standing on its own and it would be nice to see that info here.

OK.
Well apparently, disclosure maybe leaking out of the barrel in drips. However when you Google publication number US 20060145019 A1, you will find a deluge of information. First off, the publication reveals that our space craft have had artificial gravity since 1972, US Patent US3675879. A spacecraft having a triangular hull with vertical electrostatic line charges on each corner that produce a horizontal electric field parallel to the sides of the hull. This field, interacting with a plane wave emitted by antennas on the side of the hull, generates a force per volume combining both lift and propulsion.
Then in 1993, US Patent US5269482. This one is titled Protective enclosure apparatus for magnetic propulsion space vehicle. Here is the “fuel”: US Patent US6974110: Method and apparatus for converting electrostatic potential energy. And now the motor: US Patent US20030209635 and US20030209637: Electric dipole moment propulsion system and Rotating electrostatic propulsion system. And now for the craft, US20060038081: Electric dipole spacecraft.
Here are some of the diagrams.


1. A spacecraft comprised of the following components:

(a) a triangular hull in the form of an equilateral triangle;
(b) two copper plates attached on opposite vertical sides at each of the three corners of the hull (1 a) such that a sharp vertical edge is formed where they come together;
(c) an electrostatic generator used to charge the back two copper-cladded corners (1 b) to a high positive voltage, and the third forward copper-cladded corner to a high negative voltage;
(d) a horizontal slot antenna array mounted-on the sides of the hull; and
(e) a frequency generator, antenna and coaxial cables to drive the antenna array (1 d).
2. To create, by claims (1 a, 1 b, 1 c), an intense vertical line charge at the corners (1 b) and a horizontal electric field that that is parallel to the sides of the hull (1 a);
3. To create, by claims (1 d,1 e), an electromagnetic wave with a vertically polarized electric field traveling outward from the side of the hull (1 a); and
4. To create, by claims (2,3), an interaction of the electrostatic field (2) with the electromagnetic wave (3) such that a combined spacetime curvature pressure is generated on the hull in the upward and forward direction to produce lift and propulsion respectively.

www.google.com...
www.google.com...
www.google.com...
www.google.com...
I don't know if this is a hi-jacked google site or not, but some of you mathematicians, take a look at their equations.
This invention is a rotating spacecraft that utilizes four spherical conducting domes perturbing a uniform electric field in order to create a lift force by means of a magnetic moment times the gradient of a magnetic field.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
0002
An electric dipole p is two electrical charges of opposite sign [q, −q] separated by a distance a. p=qa=coulomb·meter
0003
If this dipole is moving with a velocity v, it produces a magnetic moment μ. μ = pv = qav = coulomb ⁢   ⁢ meter ⁢ meter sec = coulomb sec ⁢ meter 2 = IArea
0004
The magnetic moment is equal to a current I circulating around an area. The magnetic field B has units of kilogram per second per charge coulomb. B = kg sec ⁢   ⁢ coul
0005
The gradient of the magnetic field in the vertical direction z has units of dB dz = kg sec ⁢   ⁢ coul ⁢   ⁢ meter
0006
This gradient interacting with a magnetic moment creates a force F measured in newtons. F z = μ ⁢ dB dz = coul ⁢   ⁢ m 2 sec ⁢ kg sec ⁢   ⁢ coul ⁢   ⁢ m = kg ⁢   ⁢ m sec 2 = newton
0007
In terms of vectors, the force is equal to
F=∇(μ·B)
which is the gradient ∇ of the dot product (·) of the magnetic moment with the magnetic field. This means that the magnetic moment has to be aligned with the field. The lift force on the spacecraft would then be the magnetic moment in the vertical z-direction μz times the magnetic field in the z-direction Bz. For constant magnetic moment, the gradient affects the magnetic field only, resulting in the same force equation
F z=∇(μz ·B z)=μz ∇B z
In my sense of awe, I may have gotten some of the patents confused, but it's still there.

I'm looking at one now....in Dallas

They won't overfly the city........I know right where to look even....they route over Blue Ridge Texas....how easy

I have a lazy boy recliner in the backyard......I'll sit for two hours easily every night while my London Open trades work through.

With a pvs14.........and an Armasight Zeus 2....
So don't you see, if a wild hog shows up while I'm out there, it's his azz....

originally posted by: GBP/JPY
I'm looking at one now....in Dallas

They won't overfly the city........I know right where to look even....they route over Blue Ridge Texas....how easy

I have a lazy boy recliner in the backyard......I'll sit for two hours easily every night while my London Open trades work through.

With a pvs14.........and an Armasight Zeus 2....
So don't you see, if a wild hog shows up while I'm out there, it's his azz....

Dude, u have some nice gear!
Does your Zeus have the built in option DVR? Then try to take a movie.

a reply to: GBP/JPY

Pinky swear?

originally posted by: Violater1
I don't know if this is a hi-jacked google site or not, but some of you mathematicians, take a look at their equations.

The John St. Clair patent applications fall under the category "How big of an idiot are you?". Apparently if you believe his applications, the answer is, you're a pretty big idiot. The patent examiner, was apparently not such a big idiot, since in the upper right area of the google patents you can see they still say "application" after 11 years. If they had been granted, they would say "grant". However I've seen some pretty ridiculous patents granted so even if a patent is granted that doesn't necessarily mean it will work or do what is claimed. They only require working models for perpetual motion machine patents in the US patent office, nothing else afaik.

Here's one of his patent applications where hopefully you don't need as much math to understand it's bunk:

www.google.com...

Walking through walls training system

This invention is a training system which enables a human being to acquire sufficient hyperspace energy in order to pull the body out of dimension so that the person can walk through solid objects such as wooden doors.

Here's an article abut what the patent examiner had to say:
You file a patent application on a method of walking through walls like a ghost

The gist of the application seems to be that if you walk at the right pace and with the appropriate concentration you can walk right through the wall. Apparently crossing your arms over each other and walking forward will “creates a rotational energy channel around [the] body.” Yeah, I’m not buying it either!

Fortunately, neither did the patent examiner buy this ridiculous cry for public attention. Among other things, the First Office Action issued by the examiner explained:

"Applicant’s specification asserts that the claimed methods are for teaching a user to walk through walls. However, the principle of walking through walls is generally considered within the scientific community to be unattainable or speculative at best. Their is a lack of substantial evidence that a human is capable of breaking the well accepted laws of nature to shirt their energy out of phase with their environment and thus move through seemingly solid objects. Though there may be substantial speculation regarding the currently accepted laws of nature, such speculation remains only as theory, not accepted practice. As the practice of walking through walls is not and would not be considered a credible act by one of ordinary skill in the art, the practice of teaching a person to do such would likewise not be considered credible."

As for the flying saucer and propulsion methods, he starts with some real Maxwell equations but then the way he applies them is the equivalent of saying you can levitate yourself a foot off the ground by lifting up on your own boots. You can try pulling on your boots all you want but that won't levitate you, so he's got silly notions like that in his misapplication of the math.

It might be interesting to see what the patent examiner said about his other patent applications that were also apparently rejected, but I don't know how to look those comments up, does anybody know how to find them?

Starred yas up there......Yep, I took video two days ago posted about trying it on another thread about tr3b......

The thermal has mini DVD and records to sd cards at the touch of the switch or at a shot.....it holds 20 seconds before the shot. And I had to have the Armasight battery pack....it eats cr123's, switched to 18650's

Trouble is, I might as well say....the first ten seconds I tried it I got deltas going the same way in groups and threes......after dark....I didn't think they were birds

Little deltas like a bat kite.......showing no wing flapping..I haven't even downloaded it yet off the Armasight..but on the playback on the laptop, the scene is better, clearer and seems closer than through the thermal viewer, they call it....but it has crosshairs and is BMG authorized.

Naw it's not great tech, just what keeps me sane in this burning oven, so I can go exploring outback behind my fenceline into the govt. land at night

editby]edit on 18-5-2017 by GBP/JPY because: (no reason given)